I’ve had my eye on one of Area 419’s custom CZ457’s, they look super nice but not sure if it’s worth it to pay a bit more for a Vudoo rig instead. My thoughts with the XTR III 3.3-18 are for my 10/22 eventually.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Rifle Scopes Burris XTR3!!!
- Thread starter D_TROS
- Start date
It's a tough call Bill. I think if a guy has the disposable cash and wants the very best, that's the Voodoo.
If you are content with a really good 22RF, either because you aren't terribly serious about it (that's me) or you dont want to shell out the cash, the CZ is a fantastic choice.
I ran about 6 different ammo choices through my CZ 457 Pro Varmint. All the usual suspects. And with SK Long Range Match, right out of the box with the wooden Boyd's stock, I averaged .647 moa at 100 yards on a 5x5 group test.
I've since dropped it in an XLR Industries chassis, but I'm still less than $1000 invested into the rifle (minus optic) And that level of performance is plenty good for my needs.
If you are content with a really good 22RF, either because you aren't terribly serious about it (that's me) or you dont want to shell out the cash, the CZ is a fantastic choice.
I ran about 6 different ammo choices through my CZ 457 Pro Varmint. All the usual suspects. And with SK Long Range Match, right out of the box with the wooden Boyd's stock, I averaged .647 moa at 100 yards on a 5x5 group test.
I've since dropped it in an XLR Industries chassis, but I'm still less than $1000 invested into the rifle (minus optic) And that level of performance is plenty good for my needs.
You may have saved me a boatload of money
That performance would be plenty good for my needs as well, this is the one I was looking at - https://www.area419.com/product/cz-457-manners-elite-package/, but you're right, if I'm not going to compete with it then is it really necessary, but then I just saw CZ offers a 457 with a Manners stock from factory in the CZ 457 Varmint Precision Trainer Camo - https://cz-usa.com/product/cz-457-varmint-precision-trainer-camo/Well you may have saved me money in the long run but now I'm really liking the precision trainer... I have a Savage 93R 17HMR for "training" now, but have been wanting a nice 22LR bolt action for a while.
Either way, the XTR III would be a nice scope for them I would think.
You may have saved me a boatload of money
Well you may have saved me money in the long run but now I'm really liking the precision trainer... I have a Savage 93R 17HMR for "training" now, but have been wanting a nice 22LR bolt action for a while.
Either way, the XTR III would be a nice scope for them I would think.
I think the Precision trainer in the Manners is a fantastic rifle. And I have to admit, I leaned really hard that direction for a bit.
The only thing that talked me out of going with that rifle is my affiliation with the fellas at XLR Industries. I run a lot of their stuff and they treat me great on pricing. And they make a fantastic chassis for the 457, so it's a win all the way around. But in different circumstances. The trainer is absolutely the route I would go. The stock adjustability and ability to tinker with the torque settings on the action screws really helps dial these rifles in..
With the right ammo, the CZ is an awfully accurate little 22. And I agree, the 18x XTR3 should top it off very nicely.
That makes perfect sense since you are already familiar with XLR, most of my LR rifles have Manners which is why I'm leaning in that direction. Sorry to be off topic somewhat with the CZ conversation, now back to the XTR III...
Tyler from MK Machining said my XTR III is shipping today! Also, for those who may not know, the Hide's own @Tyler Kemp with MK Machining is now an Optics dealer as well. Tyler has a throw lever designed specifically for XTR III that he's shipping with my scope so I'll be sure to include that in my review. Also, Tyler has what's becoming one of my favorite scope bubble levels with the small footprint low-profile billet level so check out his 3D printer gear and also his billet accessories.
Okay, I know, shameless plug, but I do like to support Hide dealers. By the way, Tyler has one more XTR III 3.3-18x50 with SCR2 reticle in stock, give him a call for a great deal...
Okay, I know, shameless plug, but I do like to support Hide dealers. By the way, Tyler has one more XTR III 3.3-18x50 with SCR2 reticle in stock, give him a call for a great deal...
I have not, I do like it is Rem 700 compatible, but CZ has had years to refine their .22 and the 457 has some nice features, I'll have to look into it, thanks
Looks like you will get yours before me. Greeley is emptied out of them, they are all out in the retailers hands. So I'll have to wait on the next production run.
Also love supporting those who support us. Mainly prize table sponsors which are also hide vendors...
Let me know when we can meet Bill. Have my TT, M7, March, and both XTR3's to bring along. Even tho I am prob more busy than you next couple weeks. Jakes PRS match then the RTC Championship then thanksgiving. lol.
Regards,
DT
I did tested XTR II 5-25x50 last winter, not bad for the buck, but this US made XTR III might be a totally different tube.
That 3-18x50 would be nice to test.
That 3-18x50 would be nice to test.
It was a very strange issue! I bought the 5.5-30 SCR2 model, sealed and correct box, but the scope inside had a SCR reticle.You broke one already?
You're grounded...
Burris did a stand up job of taking care of it though. I made a claim that night, by the next morning they had sent me a 2 day air shipping label to return it.
At 11:00AM that morning I dropped it off at UPS and at 11:40AM they emailed me 2 day air tracking for a new scope on its way to me.
It came in today and I couldn't be more pleased with it. I really wanted a tree style reticle for wind holds but was afraid of it being too obstructive. Well you don't need to worry about that with the SCR2, it's almost translucent.
The etching is so fine that when you don't need the hash marks they almost dissappear, but when you do they are there.
Over all very very pleased with it, coming from an XTRII, they definitely improved on the glass and then some.
That's great to see they got you taken care of so quickly. Glad you like it!
I think as more people get these in hand it will begin making it's way into more scope comparison posts. It really stacks up great against its competition.
Not everyone will like it, human nature and this is the Hide. But I think all in all, it's a good optic. If anyone is thinking GII Razor, MK5 HD, NX8, or G2 XRS, the XTR3 is well worth looking at.
I think as more people get these in hand it will begin making it's way into more scope comparison posts. It really stacks up great against its competition.
Not everyone will like it, human nature and this is the Hide. But I think all in all, it's a good optic. If anyone is thinking GII Razor, MK5 HD, NX8, or G2 XRS, the XTR3 is well worth looking at.
i once got a Minox with MR4 that had wrong retc. bnib. the man didnt believe me and asked to send em a pic. was funny.
glad turned out good tho. this scope is pretty amazing so far.
DT
glad turned out good tho. this scope is pretty amazing so far.
DT
Some more gun porn from last weekend. AR had 3-18. My bolt had 5-30. Man i cant say enough about this FOV and eye box and finding targets.
Regards,
DT
Regards,
DT
Glad to hear Burris took care of the issue. I took the plunge on a 3.3-18 today. I ordered my scope from Tyler @MK Machining and got the chance to talk to him over the phone, which seems like is an exceedingly rare thing these days. He called me right back after I left a message and was really informative and helpful when I ordered the scope. Great person to deal with and made it really easy to utilize his company for my optics needs. Can't wait to get it and try it out.
Glad you worked with @Tyler Kemp, he is a great guy and I like their innovative accessories for scopes. I got my XTR III 3.3-18x50 yesterday from him, we are having a snow storm so limited on what I can test right now, but will be sharing more thoughts as I dig more into this scope.
khuber, stick with the mil reticle, it is perfectly capable of being a great hunting reticle. I came from the SFP MOA world myself and it took a bit to learn, but once I did I would not go back (especially as a backup ranging tool). Nice buck. I am curious as well how the thickness of the SCR2 reticle compares between the 5.5-30 and the 3.3-18, similar to the SCR reticle I find the etching to be very thin and will probably opt for illumination once it's available to help, but need to spend more time behind it for a fair evaluation.
Yeah I have less than a minute behind mine, but at 5.5 I can barely see my SCR2 reticle. It is more fine than the SCR.
Totally diff is almost an understatement. American made to Phillip made... Call me a xenophobe but even IF the image/build/etc etc quality wasn't better on the 3 than the 2 (it is far better), I would still choose the USA made one. People are going to like it.
Something I noticed as well is the usability at lower magnification. Very cool. 10x is no prob for engaging targets for sure. It is very erie tho shooting at lower powers due to the larger FOV makes it almost seem its at a lower power still but its not. Hard to explain unless you experience it on the clock.
Not sure if retc is diff thickness. My gut says no but not sure.
Regards,
DT
I'm not surprised to hear the SCR2 is thin at lower magnification. So is the SCR. I have a 4-20 and a 5-25 XTR2 on hunting rifles. On 4x the SCR is just a thin crosshair. As Bill mentioned, the illuminated version may be the best option for folks who will need those lower magnification.
I live in big country, I cant recall the last time I shot at anything under 7x. That's pretty much my setting as I hunt and I turn it up from there.
I live in big country, I cant recall the last time I shot at anything under 7x. That's pretty much my setting as I hunt and I turn it up from there.
I have two 5.5-30x with the SCR reticle, the SCR2 is indeed much more thin. If you're going to be hunting at all with it, I'd recommend the SCR.
Another 3.3-18x out today, and a 5.5-30x with an SCR2 going out tomorrow!
Another 3.3-18x out today, and a 5.5-30x with an SCR2 going out tomorrow!
MK Machining is making XTR III specific throw levers which fit perfectly without play
Throw Levers -- Available for Over 70 Different Scopes
Upgrade your optic with one of our throw levers, speeding up magnification changes and target engagements without breaking the bank. Our levers are proudly printed in the USA from durable PETG polymer. They install in a minute or less, and come with a lifetime warranty. Available for over 70...
mkmachining.com
The owner, @Tyler Kemp is a Hide member and great guy
Yep, I make em. Has notches to fit the knurling of the mag ring. Nylon construction, will take more abuse than an aluminum lever, and won't mark your scope either. An XTRII lever will "work" but the mag ring is not the same, so we've made one to exactly fit the XTRIII.
Burris XTRIII Throw Lever
Burris XTRIII Throw Lever Speeding Up Magnification Changes Without Breaking The Bank. Includes Lifetime Warranty!
mkmachining.com
I bought one of your first designed models for my XTRII and it fits great between the knurlingmy XTRIII.Yep, I make em. Has notches to fit the knurling of the mag ring. Nylon construction, will take more abuse than an aluminum lever, and won't mark your scope either. An XTRII lever will "work" but the mag ring is not the same, so we've made one to exactly fit the XTRIII.
Burris XTRIII Throw Lever
Burris XTRIII Throw Lever Speeding Up Magnification Changes Without Breaking The Bank. Includes Lifetime Warranty!
No doubt of that, Philippines made is Philippines made, XTR III made in US must be the best Burris ever done.
I wonder when these are in Finland, and what the price is.
Normally price in US you can add 24% on the price in Finland.
And the new lever is even better, fits the groove in between the knurling AND the knurling
Our CAD has improved.
DAAAANG.
Let us know what they say. Did it group good just what you saw? or did it group like crap also? just curious...
havnt shot mine on anything bigger than a 6.5x47 myself...still surprising.
GL
DT
Usually as soon as they meet demand, fill all the back orders etc.
It could take a while...
Please report back on how easy, efficient and fast the warranty service is on the XTR III
Got some trigger time today with my XTRIII. Went out to Tripple C here in Texas and made my farthest shots, out to 1100 yards on my 6.5, and what was even more impressive was that I could see not only my impacts, but the impact marks!!
Also got to compare the glass side by side at 700 yards to an ATACR and they are very close. The ATACR had a tad more clarity, but the XTR has much better sight picture and fov.
Also got to compare the glass side by side at 700 yards to an ATACR and they are very close. The ATACR had a tad more clarity, but the XTR has much better sight picture and fov.
FYI: Depending on your sales tax, it might be cheaper to buy from mk machining with their current 10% off sale (Code: SCOPEVEMBER). For me (~10% tax) it's both cheaper, and they include a throw lever and scope level.
There is a definite difference. The XTR3 was designed with the goal of keeping the durability and reliability of the XTR2, while improving on its weaknesses. They nailed that.
The largest XTR2 weakness was quality of the glass, the XTR3 has very good glass. Also the eyebox and parallax are dramatically improved. And the FOV in the XTR3 is the best in the industry.
I just got back from the Blue Ridge Ranch PRS match in NE Washington where I had Scott Satterlee in my squad. Scott is a Nighforce team shooter and quite simply one of the best guys you will ever meet anywhere. He was showing us his lightweight PRC build with an NX8 20x. He mentioned he hasnt seen anything that beats it in FOV, so I cracked out my XTR3. On 20x the NF showed 10.1 mils edge to edge, the XTR3 was at 10.3.
In defense of the NX8, that's the only optic I've seen come close to matching the XTR3 FOV. The 20x is pretty close. 30x vs 32x NF both on 30x isnt quite so close, but still a great FOV in both of them.
Preliminary testing of the XTR III 3.3-18x50 shows it to be much more forgiving with eyebox, DOF/Parallax. Edge to edge sharpness was superb below 15x making it a better choice over the NX8 for that edge clarity alone, the DOF/Parallax is much more fitting to my style of shooting as well, I prefer scopes that have a more forgiving "set it and forget it mode" I'll get a full review out soon similar to what I did with the NX8 but need more time with it
I am supposed to get my 3.3-18 delivered today. Hopefully be able to get it out this week to get sighted in, would like to use it on a few upcoming jaunts afield. Have some high hopes for this scope and Burris in general. Seems like they have always had some great ideas, but the final execution was just a hair off. Really hoping this one checks all the boxes.
I still have my XTR 4-20 and will prob nvr sell it. It is a solid scope and I know I can trust it. Glass is a step down for sure but its still a legitimate option. I would have no prob running my 4-20 esp if short on $$, which is exactly why I got caught up in this to start with.
There was a website selling the 4-20 awhile back for like $550. Nothing touches it in that price range...obviously that was a sale but if I had the $$ I would have got a couple.
Every match Ive shot this scope at Ive set the parallax at 500 and nvr touched. It is very refreshing to look through a scope and see clarity and not fiddle with it. The DOF is phenominal now that you mention it.
Looking forward to your review.
Same. Honestly tho I don't care as its made right here in UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!! If there are growing pains figuring this thing out, then I am totally fine forgiving them to figure it out as long as production stays here in USA by Americans. I cant stress the importance of this enough...
THIS is the reason I agreed to help out with this scope and represent them in the field shooting/testing their gear. God Bless America.
That being said I think they have a good thing going and as WJM mentioned, the glass has great edge to edge clarity but the bigger picture is this scope isn't just great glass (which oddly is all SH members care about) its the WHOLE package
in no particular order-
-capped or open turrets (yes the capped turret will be harder to spin. its physics. if you want the uncapped turret (larger dia ie larger lever arm) to not spin too easy, the smaller one HAS to be tougher to spin.
-oscillating tics on the elevation turret for quick acquisition and dialing
-large numbers for you blind folk
-large spacing on the ticks (only 10 mil knobs) - y a company would go over is beyond me...
-large FOV for finding targets/game
-my fav feature, the allen holes for re-zeroing the turret are on the back where you can SEE them and also markes on top of turret for fast finding
-20 yd paralax
-freaking awesome new tree retic that has everything you need and nothing you don't. ha. really like the tiny center cross
-MADE IN USA
-compact and light
-my game changing contribution, the target turret. just write down your targets and forget the time wasting arm band.
-MADE IN USA - if you don't like this, then go back to ARFCOM and buy ur chicom crap and complain about OUR president and shitty economy...lol
this post is worthless without pics...
Regards,
DT
^^ This..
I do expect bugs along the way. Not everyone is going to like it or love it. But Burris is incredibly committed to making this scope line successful.
I just got my 18x mounted last night. Headed out tonight to shoot it. I LOVE the size of it. It's very compact. In talking to Bill (wjm308) about it, both his 18x and mine appear to have the same turret feel. It's different than my 30x. It's less stiff, less clicky than my 30x. A little more similar to the XTR2 but a little more tactile. But it isnt nearly so stiff right out of the box as my 30x.
It's very compact and looks very small on the rifle. To a guy who is unused to these more compact scopes it looks pretty cool!
I started off last year in prs in production class. I had had 4 different scopes fail through the year and Burris decided to lend me an xtr2 to see if I could break. I finished the year with the scope still working and won the production series. This year I stepped onto open but couldn't get a rifle running right with various issues on various rifles. That same xtr2 is still going great even after dropping a 26 lb rifle on it from a hight. Now with the xtr3 I'm happy as a pig in shit. The field of view is amazing. The race dial is the best thing since iron sights were invented and to my huge surprise the scr2 reticle is really easy to see and use even back at 12 power. I have quiet bad eyesight and usually have issues with reticles on low power. For this reason I wasn't happy when they changed from .5 to .2 mil marks but I wanted wind dots. Now that I have it I wouldn't go back. I've used other .2 mil reticles and had trouble. This one seems to be easier to see and I'm loving it.
Anyway my training for the 2020 season started yesterday and hopefully my new rifle will be ready for next year
These are the things that stood out to me, and it really is mind boggling why the other scopes out there don't have some/all of these features. So are you just adding a new layer of tape for every stage you shoot with some type of letter or number for each target, or are you simply adding yardage marks that match your dope?
I simply put yardage marks that match my dope. I number targets usually close to far and in that stage we had to shoot them in a certain order from different positions so I just wrote the order on my data card and the target number on the turret. That way there was no way I could get confused by the process
Similar threads
