Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure on the images above....maybe lr pic is out of focus? The LR and the 12 degree "m" have 640 displays. I have confirmed it. The ELR has a 1280 display but only utilizes 640 of the pixels. I was told that this display config allowed an advantage (cost?) in rear optics. If you look in eyepiece with naked eye you can see the full display. Display config/size can allow for some different Mag/demag. Think about the steiner c35 vs s35. Same lens...same fov but one is 1x and one is 2x..... a lot of that is via the display. 800 vs 1024 Pulsar does that on a bunch of models too by tinkering with display size.Speaking of image and pixelation, did anybody else zoom in tight and notice the difference between the pixel spacing of the LR and the xELR in the images I posted in the other thread?
Way back in this thread there was conversation about how much of the 1280 screens were being utilized. I don't remember what the consensus was, but I believe my ELR is using 640 because I can see static around the margins. Looking at these two pics, I'm guessing the LR is using the full 1280, in effect giving a smoother image.
View attachment 7980205View attachment 7980206
That's weird but I'm not an optical engineer.Not sure on the images above....maybe lr pic is out of focus? The LR and the 12 degree "m" have 640 displays. I have confirmed it. The ELR has a 1280 display but only utilizes 640 of the pixels. I was told that this display config allowed an advantage (cost?) in rear optics.
This was discussed in previous pages and I suspected it might have to do with the pixel size. I suspect the rear half of the units is basically identical, and the stuff that makes them MR/LR/ELR is all on the front side with the microbolometer and the objective assembly. If they have a 1/2" screen in the back and they bump it from 640 to 1280 pixels, the pixels will be a lot smaller on the 1280 screen, which will allow the unit to take more magnification. So maybe for the UK/CANSOF trials they used the same back half design with the same size screen in back but sourced one with higher resolution so it would have half the pixel size.LR and the 12 degree "m" have 640 displays. I have confirmed it. The ELR has a 1280 display but only utilizes 640 of the pixels. I was told that this display config allowed an advantage (cost?) in rear optics.
The new breed of thermal clipons submitted for MIL evaluation seems to run dual mode — big screen for dedicated scope use, reduced size for clipon. Since there is a reticle on the ELR, I would guess is has an optional dedicated mode that uses the full screen size.This was discussed in previous pages and I suspected it might have to do with the pixel size. I suspect the rear half of the units is basically identical, and the stuff that makes them MR/LR/ELR is all on the front side with the microbolometer and the objective assembly. If they have a 1/2" screen in the back and they bump it from 640 to 1280 pixels, the pixels will be a lot smaller on the 1280 screen, which will allow the unit to take more magnification. So maybe for the UK/CANSOF trials they used the same back half design with the same size screen in back but sourced one with higher resolution so it would have half the pixel size.
Dan would know. I was able to visit Theon Sensors in Greece while there back in October 2021. They had the xELR there to play with, but it didn’t have the plastic focus fins, and I swear the eyepiece was bigger/different.That dates back to the CNVD-LR or earlier, doesn't it? IMO there's too much demag on the ELR to use as a stand-alone even if you used the full 1280 screen but maybe not. I can't imagine why they would disable that feature for civilian sales when they have left everything else enabled, and Dan said they told him there is no stand-alone mode...
This is true. Also, sometimes on boot or after a long NUC you can see the extra part of the screen at the bottom that does not get used. Shows up for a few seconds until it fades away.Not sure on the images above....maybe lr pic is out of focus? The LR and the 12 degree "m" have 640 displays. I have confirmed it. The ELR has a 1280 display but only utilizes 640 of the pixels. I was told that this display config allowed an advantage (cost?) in rear optics. If you look in eyepiece with naked eye you can see the full display. Display config/size can allow for some different Mag/demag. Think about the steiner c35 vs s35. Same lens...same fov but one is 1x and one is 2x..... a lot of that is via the display. 800 vs 1024 Pulsar does that on a bunch of models too by tinkering with display size.
Ya, that LR pic was a bad example. Try these two. Why does there appear to be as many pixels per Mil on the reticle with the MR as there are on the ELR? With a wider FOV spread out on the same pixel count, there should be fewer per MIL for the MR.Not sure on the images above....maybe lr pic is out of focus? The LR and the 12 degree "m" have 640 displays. I have confirmed it. The ELR has a 1280 display but only utilizes 640 of the pixels. I was told that this display config allowed an advantage (cost?) in rear optics. If you look in eyepiece with naked eye you can see the full display. Display config/size can allow for some different Mag/demag. Think about the steiner c35 vs s35. Same lens...same fov but one is 1x and one is 2x..... a lot of that is via the display. 800 vs 1024 Pulsar does that on a bunch of models too by tinkering with display size.
Finally another M in the wild! I am really excited to see how they compare.It’s on!
UTC-Xii vs xELR vs Voodoo-M vs UTM-X vs TigIR-6Z+ vs RH25 vs C35.
The smart scopes can be used with the ELR quickly without a spotter with some practice.Yeah thats true but that still requires a spotter and shooter to gather ranges to know how much to spin the turrets on a Steiner IFS, plus that eats up the margin between the ExLR and UTCxii. 2 shooters both with TracIR can simultaneously work through a group of targets at unknown distances ranging and working. Another benefit you can put a buddy on a gun thats unfamiliar with the range data for the rifle and get right to work.
I'm really disappointed Eotech didnt provide some provision for ranging. The Raptar pricing is excessive and it's surprising nothing has come about to challenge it.
As soon as I get it back I'll post some pics. Should be this week.I'd like to see what one of Jay's hot rodded PVS-30's look like.
Awesome, thank you!As soon as I get it back I'll post some pics. Should be this week.
I definitely do as I'm trying to decide between them..We want pics of the Vudoo M and ELR side by side. The people have spoken.@TheHorta I’m looking at you..
How about a video? I'll be doing that next month!I definitely do as I'm trying to decide between them..
Sounds damn goodHow about a video? I'll be doing that next month!
I'm starting to deeply regret not waiting for thr elr, impulse bought the lr. I'm still happy with its performance.
It’s been a topic of discussion in some other groups I’m in. Most don’t leave batteries in their devices, and I usually don’t either, but I left mine in overnight and the ELR was dead the next day.Where are “many others” discussing parasitic drain on the ELRs? This is the first mention of it I’ve seen anywhere on the series of tubes. I haven’t yet marked it as a big issue with mine but I haven’t used it in a few weeks, maybe I’ll go check the battery.
I thought that might be it (and I did leave it in standby overnight the first night). Seems to drain when confirmed off. Even if you insert batteries with the unit turned off.Part of me wonders slightly if anyone is leaving it in standby by accident. I left mine in standby for like 3 hours the day I got it because I didn’t hold the power-off button quite long enough, and unless you look through it at the right time you could miss the standby indication on the screen since it only flashes intermittently.
Ditto.The demo ELR I’ve had my hands on for the last week or so is still on the first set of 4x CR123s and is at like 2/3 power after 3 different hunting outings. I scan with a handheld and leave the ELR off unless I need a closer look or to take a shot. It boots up so fast it’s not a pain shutting it off in between. But definitely no parasitic drain on this one.
I could be in the same boat. I turn 55 next month, so I plead senility.It is possible I accidentally left it on again, I don’t have a crystal clear memory of shutting it down after I took those neighbor pics I posted above.![]()
You probably didn't. Two of my buddies both have drain and only one battery out of the 4 dies. No they are not in standby.It is possible I accidentally left it on again, I don’t have a crystal clear memory of shutting it down after I took those neighbor pics I posted above.![]()
My question is who thought it would be a good idea to leave batteries in their device during storage? LolI mean in SHTF pop the battery pack back in… it’s not rocket science, and this isn’t a self defense close range thermal for your AR lol
Do you have these yet? Would be much appreciated if you did!I've got back to back pics through the MR, LR, ELR and SY-Cii on various magnifications at 400 and 800yds. I just need to get them downloaded and sorted out.
They are posted over on Wig's Night Ops thread. It wasn't a very good night for thermals and I'm a shitty photographer so they aren't "breathtaking".Do you have these yet? Would be much appreciated if you did!
I'll preface all of the following by saying I think the voodoo s is a bad ass little device for it's intended purposes.Of course, the “formerly known as xELR” ELR has a much tighter FoV, and should be able to punch past the Voodoo-M on optics alone, thanks to that gargantuan planetoid of Germanium we call an “objective.” When I look at the ELR, all the Trekkie inside me sees is the planet-killer from the original series episode “Doomsday Machine”.
View attachment 7992177
But… and this is still very preliminary… the Voodoo seems to hang very well with the ELR and both are easily usable to 20x optical magnification. In front of a S&B 3-27, I find the entire zoom range to be usable. Sure, 27x doesn’t get you much, if anything, over 20x but I’m pleasantly surprised at how well they both hold-up at extreme optical magnifications.
Between the two, the Voodoo is the better unit *overall*, but in terms of pure reach the ELR has the edge. The rest of the package pushes the Voodoo ahead of the EOTech/Theon. The most obvious are the size and weight advantages of the Voodoo, which are non-trivial to say the least. I have the TracIR cable for the Voodoo as well, and my preliminary tinkering shows it to work just like it does on the Trij/BAE units, provided you have a Wilcox AB Raptar. I know many don’t care about TracIR, but I’m a big fan because I don’t do this for a living and I’m always swapping guns and optics and rarely have enough time to learn my dope on anything, so TracIR makes a handicapped retard like me look like Carlos Hathcock.
I’ve seen many others mention this, but the ELR has *serious* parasitic drain issues and some weird battery thing that it’ll drain one battery completely and won’t turn on, even if the other 3 batteries are fresh.
Internal mechanical shutter on the ELR rocks. It should be a standard feature on every thermal since 2010.
Whaddup with dat, PoT?!
Gonna run a Red-I on both and see how it looks.
On the topic of rail flex, If you zero your rifle prone then go to clipped into a tripod I have noticed that I get a POI shift. I leave the reticle turned on and "zeroed" to the same position as my day optic. This way when clipped into a tripod I can see if i am inducing any rail flex. Are you saying that rail flex is irrelevant and the POI should be the same from prone with the bipod on the fore end and clipped into a tripod just in front of the magwell?The second bigger issue Ive had with TRACIR is that it always displays a disturbed reticle which you don't generally want on a clip-on. It is very inaccurate because of induced rail flex. Even rock solid chassis like AI will flex when you load them on a bipod or tripod. Challenge....go out and align tracir to your reticle then range at 600 yds. lets say it displays 3 mils elevation correction. Ok that should equate to roughly 3 mils on your primary reticle too. Now lean into your rifle and you'll see that entire image including the disturbed reticle shifts up as your rail flexes over the length of your rifle ( just like an IR laser on a M4). Now that disturbed reticle is at 2.5 mils on your primary reticle...so which do you use? The answer is on a unity optic you'd still be good using your primary reticle (3mils). Disturbed reticles are great in stand alone optics because you're using the thermal optic as an aiming device rather than a "looking" device.
Riley do you get the same zero shift without the thermal when shooting prone/bipod vs tripod only?On the topic of rail flex, If you zero your rifle prone then go to clipped into a tripod I have noticed that I get a POI shift. I leave the reticle turned on and "zeroed" to the same position as my day optic. This way when clipped into a tripod I can see if i am inducing any rail flex. Are you saying that rail flex is irrelevant and the POI should be the same from prone with the bipod on the fore end and clipped into a tripod just in front of the magwell?
If you have rail flex in the day without the clip on installed due to that scenario you described.. and it affects your POI; expect the same with the thermal clip on installed.
No POI shift when prone vs tripod in the day scope. Just when thermal is clipped on.Riley do you get the same zero shift without the thermal when shooting prone/bipod vs tripod only?
ATX and manners CS2 with LRI bridge...I would get a different / more sturdy bridge or rail set depending on what type of rig it is. The thermal’s weight could be causing flex in that situation
So flex in your rail is causing this when bipod loading. With clip on attached. I'm sure your day scope is on receiver rail, no flex there. Perhaps load your tripod less? Use a mlok arca rail on your hand guard that adds more rigidity to the rail to remove flex? Idk just trying to throw some ideas for a quick fix.No POI shift when prone vs tripod in the day scope. Just when thermal is clipped on.