Good article Savage Sniper
- Thread starter boottrac
- Start date
Re: Good article Savage Sniper
I am surprised that they used a good scope this time, not some 3-9 or aimpoint like I have seen them do a few years ago and they had to use a lead sled of course. that is why i do not buy those magazines anymore, most of those guys can't shoot.
I am surprised that they used a good scope this time, not some 3-9 or aimpoint like I have seen them do a few years ago and they had to use a lead sled of course. that is why i do not buy those magazines anymore, most of those guys can't shoot.
Re: Good article Savage Sniper
Weak groups.
"Most rounds generally stayed inside an 1.5" circle at 100 yards"?
If I were Savage, I'd be pissed at this review.
Sucks when someone that can't shoot reviews the accuracy of your rifle.
Amusing the author thought that performance was good.
Weak groups.
"Most rounds generally stayed inside an 1.5" circle at 100 yards"?
If I were Savage, I'd be pissed at this review.
Sucks when someone that can't shoot reviews the accuracy of your rifle.
Amusing the author thought that performance was good.
Re: Good article Savage Sniper
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: turbo54</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Weak groups.
"Most rounds generally stayed inside an 1.5" circle at 100 yards"?
If I were Savage, I'd be pissed at this review.
Sucks when someone that can't shoot reviews the accuracy of your rifle.
Amusing the author thought that performance was good. </div></div>
I had the same reaction when I read the article. 1.5" groups from a Savage? Laughable.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: turbo54</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Weak groups.
"Most rounds generally stayed inside an 1.5" circle at 100 yards"?
If I were Savage, I'd be pissed at this review.
Sucks when someone that can't shoot reviews the accuracy of your rifle.
Amusing the author thought that performance was good. </div></div>
I had the same reaction when I read the article. 1.5" groups from a Savage? Laughable.
Re: Good article Savage Sniper
i dont shoot a savage (yet) and cringed at 1.5 inches. i did better flinching on my 300 RUM...
i dont shoot a savage (yet) and cringed at 1.5 inches. i did better flinching on my 300 RUM...
Re: Good article Savage Sniper
Well if you are a terrible shooter, 1.5 inches is pretty damn good. My savage was capable of shooting sub-moa out of the box. Right now, its shooting at right around .6moa, which is what I am capable of atm.
Well if you are a terrible shooter, 1.5 inches is pretty damn good. My savage was capable of shooting sub-moa out of the box. Right now, its shooting at right around .6moa, which is what I am capable of atm.
Re: Good article Savage Sniper
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: attherange</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am surprised that they used a good scope this time, not some 3-9 or aimpoint like I have seen them do a few years ago and they had to use a lead sled of course. that is why i do not buy those magazines anymore, most of those guys can't shoot. </div></div>
an aimpoint? that IS laughable.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: attherange</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I am surprised that they used a good scope this time, not some 3-9 or aimpoint like I have seen them do a few years ago and they had to use a lead sled of course. that is why i do not buy those magazines anymore, most of those guys can't shoot. </div></div>
an aimpoint? that IS laughable.
Re: Good article Savage Sniper
My factory target that came with my savaage was 3 shots in .4 inches.
The 1.5 inch groups is the superformance ammo's fault.
My savage does not like that stuff either.
BMT
My factory target that came with my savaage was 3 shots in .4 inches.
The 1.5 inch groups is the superformance ammo's fault.
My savage does not like that stuff either.
BMT
Similar threads
