I got pulled over.

[Xander3Zero]

Idk where you guys live, but where I live its definitely not "suspicious" to have two people in their 20s-30s and a 17 year old in the same car, even if it was late at night. Especially considering that the 17 year old was accompanied by an older family member. You guys must live in some nasty places where the immediate thought goes to kidnapping or prostitution/pimping...

Also to all the tough guy hero-dads out there saying that they would bash the OP's face in for giving their 17 year old daughter a ride... you need to check in with reality. Recall back to when you were 15, 16, 17, etc. and the things you did. You were never hanging out with friends and ended up getting in a car with a friend's friend (aka a stranger to you)? Please don't go around beating up innocent people for your child's own decisions, civilization will crumble.

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

Or a bunch of people who actually use a bit of logic.

Sometimes you get a ticket, sometimes you don't. Next time, use your blinker like you agreed to when you signed for your driver's license.

Oh look it's officer superior intellect. Who has yet to comprehend the issue is not the ticket for the seat belt or the turn signal. The issue is joe citizen being removed from his vehicle, frisked and questioned like he is jack the ripper.

I forgot. I am on ignore because officer thomas's authority was questioned. Too bad he could have learned something.

 

[Dthomas3523]

Idk where you guys live, but where I live its definitely not "suspicious" to have two people in their 20s-30s and a 17 year old in the same car, even if it was late at night. Especially considering that the 17 year old was accompanied by an older family member. You guys must live in some nasty places where the immediate thought goes to kidnapping or prostitution/pimping...

Also to all the tough guy hero-dads out there saying that they would bash the OP's face in for giving their 17 year old daughter a ride... you need to check in with reality. Recall back to when you were 15, 16, 17, etc. and the things you did. You were never hanging out with friends and ended up getting in a car with a friend's friend (aka a stranger to you)? Please don't go around beating up innocent people for your child's own decisions, civilization will crumble.

While I likely agree that someone riding around with someone in that situation is probably in and of itself not "suspicious," there were probably quite a few other reasons for the brief detention extending past the traffic infraction/s.

Alcohol had likely been consumed by one or more of the occupants.....therefore it's likely the OP or one of the women displayed some nervous behavior (a lot of people get nervous in general when they are pulled over). The officer has no clue if its alcohol, drugs, weapons, etc etc, making someone nervous, or just plain nerves. That's why he separated the two parties and asked some questions. He then satisfied his "reasonable suspicion" that a crime may have or was about to occur and released the occupants and vehicle.

Obviously I wasn't there, and we are only getting the OP's side of the story. Even with just his side, I can almost assuredly tell you from my experience he and/or the women and/or the time/place of the occurrence gave the cop more than enough reason to ask a few questions (OP and occupants can always exercise their Constitutional Right to remain silent).

People need to remember to look at things from the cop's point of view. Its a different world.

I do agree with you.....teenager's do stupid shit. However, the OP is 32, and if he was just being neighborly and giving them a ride, totally fine. But in other situations, even where a teenager is being stupid, someone in their 20's and up has a responsibility to remove themselves from the situation where someone else is being stupid.

 

[CrazyHorse_mk14]

Again it’s the asshole buddy reference that I’m reminded of..

On one hand people are like fuck the police he wouldn’t have done me like that .. yet when they’re pulled over it’s “yes sir officer thanks have a nice day”

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

While I likely agree that someone riding around with someone in that situation is probably in and of itself not "suspicious," there were probably quite a few other reasons for the brief detention extending past the traffic infraction/s.

Alcohol had likely been consumed by one or more of the occupants.....therefore it's likely the OP or one of the women displayed some nervous behavior (a lot of people get nervous in general when they are pulled over). The officer has no clue if its alcohol, drugs, weapons, etc etc, making someone nervous, or just plain nerves. That's why he separated the two parties and asked some questions. He then satisfied his "reasonable suspicion" that a crime may have or was about to occur and released the occupants and vehicle.

Obviously I wasn't there, and we are only getting the OP's side of the story. Even with just his side, I can almost assuredly tell you from my experience he and/or the women and/or the time/place of the occurrence gave the cop more than enough reason to ask a few questions (OP and occupants can always exercise their Constitutional Right to remain silent).

People need to remember to look at things from the cop's point of view. Its a different world.

I do agree with you.....teenager's do stupid shit. However, the OP is 32, and if he was just being neighborly and giving them a ride, totally fine. But in other situations, even where a teenager is being stupid, someone in their 20's and up has a responsibility to remove themselves from the situation where someone else is being stupid.

Officer Knowitall put someone on ignore so he does not have facts and is inserting fiction to support his argument. The OP stated he picked up the girls across the street from the bar. So "Alcohol had likely been consumed" is an invalid excuse. Then he goes on to say someone being nervous is cause to separate and question them. But he adds a lot of people get nervous in general when pulled over. Just all excuses for proactive policing. Try policing for profit in your search engine and see what that turns up.

None of your excuses for this are valid just quit trying to justify it.

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

Again it’s the asshole buddy reference that I’m reminded of..

On one hand people are like fuck the police he wouldn’t have done me like that .. yet when they’re pulled over it’s “yes sir officer thanks have a nice day”

You like that little joke don't you? An authority of the state with a badge and a gun gets to bully the populace. How about the cop puts the tazer, gun, stick and whatever other self protection down and then pull his stunt? Not likely.

 

[deersniper]

Again it’s the asshole buddy reference that I’m reminded of..

On one hand people are like fuck the police he wouldn’t have done me like that .. yet when they’re pulled over it’s “yes sir officer thanks have a nice day”

Fear of the state /= respect.

Most of the people that are nice to you really don't like you.

 

[CrazyHorse_mk14]

You like that little joke don't you? An authority of the state with a badge and a gun gets to bully the populace. How about the cop puts the tazer, gun, stick and whatever other self protection down and then pull his stunt? Not likely.

Yea it cracks me up every time

You do too! Why would anyone one want to ignore ya, you pretty much just say the same thing over and over again. You haven’t satisfied my interest in how’s the serviceman’s job different than the police.

Replace cop with Marine each time you repeat yourself.

“Tell the Marine to put his gun down and see if he try’s that shit” gimme a fucking break!

Y’all could’ve picked 900 different stops to criticize the police state and actually may have had something.. but this one ain’t getting it

 

[Dthomas3523]

Yea it cracks me up every time

You do too! Why would anyone one want to ignore ya, you pretty much just say the same thing over and over again. You haven’t satisfied my interest in how’s the serviceman’s job different than the police.

Replace cop with Marine each time you repeat yourself.

“Tell the Marine to put his gun down and see if he try’s that shit” gimme a fucking break!

Y’all could’ve picked 900 different stops to criticize the police state and actually may have had something.. but this one ain’t getting it

Probably over 90% of the physical altercations I get into never involve me using a weapon. Everyone keeps insisting they'd do something if the cop didn't have his tools on him.........yet most almost never use anything more than their hands to subdue someone.

But hey.....statistics are for dummies........

 

[1J04]

Now this is more like it. Two, yep, two pissing matches going at the same time. But the other one has lost it's momentum and pretty much ran it's full course. But this special contest? We'll see page 5 today, maybe.

That's all I got. You guys are so rowdy.

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

Yea it cracks me up every time

You do too! Why would anyone one want to ignore ya, you pretty much just say the same thing over and over again. You haven’t satisfied my interest in how’s the serviceman’s job different than the police.

Replace cop with Marine each time you repeat yourself.

“Tell the Marine to put his gun down and see if he try’s that shit” gimme a fucking break!

Y’all could’ve picked 900 different stops to criticize the police state and actually may have had something.. but this one ain’t getting it

You are a special kind of stoopid aren't you?

 

[Xander3Zero]

While I likely agree that someone riding around with someone in that situation is probably in and of itself not "suspicious," there were probably quite a few other reasons for the brief detention extending past the traffic infraction/s.

Alcohol had likely been consumed by one or more of the occupants.....therefore it's likely the OP or one of the women displayed some nervous behavior (a lot of people get nervous in general when they are pulled over). The officer has no clue if its alcohol, drugs, weapons, etc etc, making someone nervous, or just plain nerves. That's why he separated the two parties and asked some questions. He then satisfied his "reasonable suspicion" that a crime may have or was about to occur and released the occupants and vehicle.

Obviously I wasn't there, and we are only getting the OP's side of the story. Even with just his side, I can almost assuredly tell you from my experience he and/or the women and/or the time/place of the occurrence gave the cop more than enough reason to ask a few questions (OP and occupants can always exercise their Constitutional Right to remain silent).

People need to remember to look at things from the cop's point of view. Its a different world.

I do agree with you.....teenager's do stupid shit. However, the OP is 32, and if he was just being neighborly and giving them a ride, totally fine. But in other situations, even where a teenager is being stupid, someone in their 20's and up has a responsibility to remove themselves from the situation where someone else is being stupid.

OP said he doesn't drink, the underage person was 17 so let's assume they weren't drinking, and if the legal-aged passenger had been drinking -- who gives a fuck?!

Again I'll mention that in my area, getting pulled over for a blinker violation and having 3 various aged/mixed gender people in the car definitely isn't suspicious in any way. Sure pull them over for the violation, even ask them a few direct questions if your overly concerned and ensure everyone's coherent, but then issue the ticket and be on your way... Thinking that he needed to separate them and interrogate them based on the remote chance that this sober driver with a sparkly-clean record may be involved in some kind of human sex trafficking?!?! Silly. Maybe if you live in some shit hole in South America...

Your right, we only have the OP's story, but who are we to question what he said was true or not? If I base my opinion on the idea that the OP didn't leave any important details out, then I would side with him and say that what the officer did was completely unnecessary and ridiculous. I too would be upset about how the events played out and would feel as if I had been unfairly treated.

If we even begin to assume that the OP is lying or leaving out important information, then this whole thread is shit and no one should post in it anymore because it would all be based on hearsay.

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

Probably over 90% of the physical altercations I get into never involve me using a weapon. Everyone keeps insisting they'd do something if the cop didn't have his tools on him.........yet most almost never use anything more than their hands to subdue someone.

But hey.....statistics are for dummies........

Wait, Really? No way. You put internet bullies on ignore. No fucking way you don't resort to weapon use.

 

[Dthomas3523]

OP said he doesn't drink, the underage person was 17 so let's assume they weren't drinking, and if the legal-aged passenger had been drinking -- who gives a fuck?!

Again I'll mention that in my area, getting pulled over for a blinker violation and having 3 various aged/mixed gender people in the car definitely isn't suspicious in any way. Sure pull them over for the violation, even ask them a few direct questions if your overly concerned and ensure everyone's coherent, but then issue the ticket and be on your way... Thinking that he needed to separate them and interrogate them based on the remote chance that this sober driver with a sparkly-clean record may be involved in some kind of human sex trafficking?!?! Silly. Maybe if you live in some shit hole in South America...

Your right, we only have the OP's story, but who are we to question what he said was true or not? If I base my opinion on the idea that the OP didn't leave any important details out, then I would side with him and say that what the officer did was completely unnecessary and ridiculous. I too would be upset about how the events played out and would feel as if I had been unfairly treated.

If we even begin to assume that the OP is lying or leaving out important information, then this whole thread is shit and no one should post in it anymore because it would all be based on hearsay.

You obviously have no experience on what "suspicion" is. I'd recommend doing some research.

I'm not sure who brought up the "sex trafficking" suspicion. I agree that's a bit of a stretch. But, the cop doesn't have to be able to pinpoint his suspicion to something that exact. There are quite a few things that he could have been concerned about.

Also, even if its 1%, I'd rather piss off (legally) 99 people like the OP and help out 1 person who was actually in trouble.

Hell, even if its 1/1000, as long as its legal and reasonable, I'll take having 999 people like the OP to save that one person.

"Most" LEOs don't get into LE to piss people off, but if that's what it takes to save a few people.......

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

Suspicion= Gestapo for I am the fucking law and you will comply or I will make your life hell. I will investigate for a crime. By chance I may just find one.
If you don't like it don't drive. Driving is not a right. Oh yeah if I think you are suspicious I can stop and frisk you walking down the street.

 

[CrazyHorse_mk14]

You are a special kind of stoopid aren't you?

Don’t let this retarded look fool you!

My momma said I’m extra special and don’t have to listen to any police cause I have my rights ..

The reason I keep drawing the comparison to the armed services is simple. We managed to learn that being disrespectful to the troops is fucked up. It’s the policy makers fault not the enforcers. Took destroying the minds of our Vietnam vets to learn that (my pops included).

Don’t hate the cop, hate the politician!

 

[Deleted member 10043]

t

Dthomas, how is me being in the back of a cruiser for my "safety"? What am I going to do, throw myself into traffic or beat my head off the hood? And im sure that during the long history of people driving vehicles, this wasnt the first time a guy gave 2 girls a ride. Just saying. I must be a trail blazer if not!

Darwin was right.

 

[W54/XM-388]

Probably over 90% of the physical altercations I get into never involve me using a weapon. Everyone keeps insisting they'd do something if the cop didn't have his tools on him.........yet most almost never use anything more than their hands to subdue someone.
But hey.....statistics are for dummies........

My guess as an outsider, not in the profession my thinking on why that is would be something like this:

Most people who are your average law abiding trouble avoiding citizen, will comply even if you didn't have "tools" on you visible because logic tells them it's just going to be a matter of some inconvenience for them, possibly a bit of money and being an ass in a major way will change that outcome to something they really don't want & mess up their life for a bit, so behave and do as told & then get on with life, with minimal interruption.

Then there are some fools or possibly drunk or on drugs and probably have no idea how to actually fight with their bare hands and how quickly they will find themselves on the ground when somebody knows what they are doing.

Then you run into the guys with actual weapons or skills who actually want to fight and then as the saying goes, if someone starts a gun/knife fight with you, you need to bring all your guns and all your friends with guns to the party.

 

[Sean the Nailer]

There is SO MUCH going sideways on this alleged 'conversation'. All-ya'll, needs to look at this whole discussion from a step back. (only my opinion) But seriously, there are so many touting "all the way right" and then so many touting " all the way wrong"....

Anybody getting anywhere? I think not.

And yes, I'm old enough to remember "To Serve And Protect" was both a motto and written on the cars. (painted, stickered, whatever) Back then things were more proactive:
To Serve (present/future tense)
Protect (present/future tense)

That has been removed years ago, and replaced with "Community Policing"
Policing (present tense)

And for the interactions of 'citizens', they can only do something once a law has been broken. An example would be the lady in B.C. whom caught/stopped an adult in her home, whom was there to 'be with' her 14 year old daughter. She caught him, tied him up, filmed it all, and called the cops. Again. She had a number of times, because of this guys interest in her daughter. They did nothing (allegedly) until she tied him up in her home. Then she was arrested, for 'unlawful confinement' or something like that. Because he hadn't broke the law, YET.

That's my take of the situation, others may have more 'professional insight' into it,,, but that's the gist of things today.

I ain't saying it's good, I ain't saying it's bad,,,, I'm just saying it is the way it is. What does this add to the conversation? Nothing much.

What has anyone really added to the conversation in 'some pages'..... nothing much. All better now? I doubt it.

I will continue to go my merry way, with my daily mantra of "be the better man" and 'be better than I was yesterday'. Now go ahead, show me where I'm wrong, there. I can handle it, I've got broad shoulders.

 

[Dthomas3523]

There is SO MUCH going sideways on this alleged 'conversation'. All-ya'll, needs to look at this whole discussion from a step back. (only my opinion) But seriously, there are so many touting "all the way right" and then so many touting " all the way wrong"....

Anybody getting anywhere? I think not.

And yes, I'm old enough to remember "To Serve And Protect" was both a motto and written on the cars. (painted, stickered, whatever) Back then things were more proactive:
To Serve (present/future tense)
Protect (present/future tense)

That has been removed years ago, and replaced with "Community Policing"
Policing (present tense)

And for the interactions of 'citizens', they can only do something once a law has been broken. An example would be the lady in B.C. whom caught/stopped an adult in her home, whom was there to 'be with' her 14 year old daughter. She caught him, tied him up, filmed it all, and called the cops. Again. She had a number of times, because of this guys interest in her daughter. They did nothing (allegedly) until she tied him up in her home. Then she was arrested, for 'unlawful confinement' or something like that. Because he hadn't broke the law, YET.

That's my take of the situation, others may have more 'professional insight' into it,,, but that's the gist of things today.

I ain't saying it's good, I ain't saying it's bad,,,, I'm just saying it is the way it is. What does this add to the conversation? Nothing much.

What has anyone really added to the conversation in 'some pages'..... nothing much. All better now? I doubt it.

I will continue to go my merry way, with my daily mantra of "be the better man" and 'be better than I was yesterday'. Now go ahead, show me where I'm wrong, there. I can handle it, I've got broad shoulders.

I don't think you're wrong.

Sometimes things can definitely go sideways with the law. Depending on the situation, you can do preemptive policing, but it's quite a bit tougher than once a crime has been committed.

I'd have to see the actual facts of the case you stated above to make any comments about it. I will say however, sometimes discretion in charging people with crimes isn't utilized properly.

 

[Threadcutter308]

There is SO MUCH going sideways on this alleged 'conversation'. All-ya'll, needs to look at this whole discussion from a step back. (only my opinion) But seriously, there are so many touting "all the way right" and then so many touting " all the way wrong"....

Anybody getting anywhere? I think not.

And yes, I'm old enough to remember "To Serve And Protect" was both a motto and written on the cars. (painted, stickered, whatever) Back then things were more proactive:
To Serve (present/future tense)
Protect (present/future tense)

That has been removed years ago, and replaced with "Community Policing"
Policing (present tense)

And for the interactions of 'citizens', they can only do something once a law has been broken. An example would be the lady in B.C. whom caught/stopped an adult in her home, whom was there to 'be with' her 14 year old daughter. She caught him, tied him up, filmed it all, and called the cops. Again. She had a number of times, because of this guys interest in her daughter. They did nothing (allegedly) until she tied him up in her home. Then she was arrested, for 'unlawful confinement' or something like that. Because he hadn't broke the law, YET.

That's my take of the situation, others may have more 'professional insight' into it,,, but that's the gist of things today.

I ain't saying it's good, I ain't saying it's bad,,,, I'm just saying it is the way it is. What does this add to the conversation? Nothing much.

What has anyone really added to the conversation in 'some pages'..... nothing much. All better now? I doubt it.

I will continue to go my merry way, with my daily mantra of "be the better man" and 'be better than I was yesterday'. Now go ahead, show me where I'm wrong, there. I can handle it, I've got broad shoulders.

You're Canadian........

Can't fool me...I know the Cops up there say "Sorry" to you....Right ?

When I was working in B.C., I was down in Delta (Vancouver industrial suburb) between sales calls. Was/am a WA state residence, so my car had WA plates. Was sitting in my car, parked on a side street. A Cop car pulls up behind me, Cop gets out, comes up and essentially wants to know what I'm doing. Depending on who I was, it could have looked a little suspicious. I was in a Lexus, in business attire, so, no biggie. I was very polite and SHE (the Cop) figured it out quick. SHE was a HOTTIE ! Man, if I wasn't married and the opportunity "arose".......well, fat kid on a Smartie scenario.

 

[Xander3Zero]

You obviously have no experience on what "suspicion" is. I'd recommend doing some research.

I'm not sure who brought up the "sex trafficking" suspicion. I agree that's a bit of a stretch. But, the cop doesn't have to be able to pinpoint his suspicion to something that exact. There are quite a few things that he could have been concerned about.

Also, even if its 1%, I'd rather piss off (legally) 99 people like the OP and help out 1 person who was actually in trouble.

Hell, even if its 1/1000, as long as its legal and reasonable, I'll take having 999 people like the OP to save that one person.

"Most" LEOs don't get into LE to piss people off, but if that's what it takes to save a few people.......

The term that we should be talking about is "reasonable suspicion". Not sure what about the OP's situation gave the officer legal, reasonable suspicion.

And that's fine that you think its okay to unfairly treat 99 or 999 people to get that 1 person, but that's not how the law works. The term is innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. Imagine if our courts decided that it was okay to throw 999 innocent people into jail in order to get that 1 actual criminal. Imagine if 99% of our politicians were under investigation for corruption in order to get to that 1 real criminal. What if we decided to organize missile strikes on 99% of the world in order to get to those foreign countries that are actually conducting illegal arms research/manufacturing.

There is due diligence, and then there is complete utter bullshit. Having to walk through a metal detector every time at the airport is due diligence. Having some guy put his fingers in my asshole every time I travel is complete utter bullshit.

Edited to add that I'm just trying to have a civil debate here. I'm not taking offense to anyone's comments here, and nor should you take offense to mine!

 

[Dthomas3523]

The term that we should be talking about is "reasonable suspicion". Not sure what about the OP's situation gave the officer legal, reasonable suspicion.

And that's fine that you think its okay to unfairly treat 99 or 999 people to get that 1 person, but that's not how the law works. The term is innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. Imagine if our courts decided that it was okay to throw 999 innocent people into jail in order to get that 1 actual criminal. Imagine if 99% of our politicians were under investigation for corruption in order to get to that 1 real criminal. What if we decided to organize missile strikes on 99% of the world in order to get to those foreign countries that are actually conducting illegal arms research/manufacturing.

There is due diligence, and then there is complete utter bullshit. Having to walk through a metal detector every time at the airport is due diligence. Having some guy put his fingers in my asshole every time I travel is complete utter bullshit.

Edited to add that I'm just trying to have a civil debate here. I'm not taking offense to anyone's comments here, and nor should you take offense to mine!

Innocent until proven guilty is for court.

No suspicion, mere suspicion, reasonable suspicion, and probable cause are where police are concerned. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt and innocent until proven guilty are not utilized in the field.

My comments about the 1/1000 had the disclaimer "legal" attached to them. I don't care if someone "thinks" what I did wasn't reasonable or legal. As long as I know and a court would uphold my actions, I'm going to do the right thing. That's what I get paid to do, the oath I took, and what the public expects. I am not required (and if we were, nothing would get done) to have proof beyond a reasonable doubt for a detention, arrest, search, etc. That's for the courts. While some may think that's unfair....the SCOTUS disagrees. If they decide to change their ruling/opinions in the future, I will adjust my behavior appropriately and professionally.

Its funny, if a cop were to come on here and start telling someone how to do their job, said person would lose their shit about how its their profession and don't question them. But everyone is a youtube lawyer when it comes to cops (not directing this at you).

Just from the OP's description of what happened, the officer already had reasonable suspicion to separate them and check their stories. Now, did he have that suspicion before the stop and used it to initiate the stop? Absolutely not (unless he saw him pick up the two women). His reason for the stop was the traffic violation. He then made additional observations which led him to question (not interrogate as some have said) the subjects.

I agree there is definitely a difference between reasonable and bullshit. But, I don't think the OP's encounter is the right example to use for a bullshit one.

I appreciate the civil response and I'm also here for the same. I only post in these LE topics to hopefully shed some light on the perspective of the LEO involved, as its often times easy to forget. Many times I have been guilty of this even in my profession. I'll see a youtube video and think "wow, that's bad, that cop is so screwed." Then I hear all the facts and realize it was perfectly reasonable under the circumstances.

Remember, a cop doesn't "have to be right, he only has to be reasonable." Is it right to shoot a kid who has a toy gun? Nope. Is it reasonable if the kid ran up to someone and pointed what looked to be a gun.......absolutely.

Was the cop here right in his suspicion the OP "may" have been involved in criminal activity? Nope.......he turned out to be wrong. Was he reasonable? You bet your ass he was.

 

[CrazyHorse_mk14]

Civil? The fuck is that? If someone hasn’t called you stoopid you ain’t doing it right !

We could very likely steal all the piss out of the op ed if you mofos will quit posting on it

 

[...]

Let me guess another officer of the state.
If your underage daughter is running the streets at night you have a bigger problem. Clue: It's not who she is running with. It's the one who raised her.

BTW How long you been waiting to use our vagisil photo?

Hardly an “officer of the state”..... go due some research on here before you open your whiney bitch mouth again.......it’ll keep you from looking like a moron in the future

You’ll honestly have a hard time finding someone who supports personal liberty more than me......

But you’re just being an obnoxious cunt looking to bitch

Dont wanna get questioned by the cops..... don’t break the law dumbass

 

[QuickNDirty]

don’t break the law dumbass

That'd make a good bumper sticker.

 

[Threadcutter308]

That'd make a good bumper sticker.

I'm afraid it probably wouldn't have much impact though.........

 

[1J04]

I got some clueless Puppies for you guys just to help ya get to page 5 while the 'other' melee is picking up steam and rapidly approaching page 9. Well, thanks to the guest of honor not being able to let it go. Carry on. Fuck I love this place.

 

[Threadcutter308]

I got some clueless Puppies for you guys just to help ya get to page 5 while the 'other' melee is picking up steam and rapidly approaching page 9. Well, thanks to the guest of honor not being able to let it go. Carry on. Fuck I love this place.

You didn't imprison them in the Galag did you ? Cinderblocks and Tan prison paint in the background......sure looks suspicious

 

[CrazyHorse_mk14]

The pup on the back row far left.. def on something ! Pat that mofo down and we’ll make some bread off this deal.

Fuck! We need a Greg if we want any chance at winning

 

[steve123]

It never ends, life's constant BS. They add up and often there is no answer, except to let it go. The letting go part is hard, it's forgiveness, that's for your benefit, not them.

I got stopped by a G&F cop, on a main road, he was 600Y back and saw me go through a red light. I went through the red light because there wasn't any cars around and I was very late, lol. My bad.

I was at a local get together at a place downtown, there was a movie put on a screen and there were no seats left so I sat on a landscape wall. A cop, one with very high and polished boots, lol, came over and with the greatest disrespect I've ever received commanded me to get off the wall. I complied and looking back it was stupid I didn't get his badge and name to turn in to his boss.

That same cop messed up my daughters insurance claim somehow when she got in an accident. I'm in the same town still and don't see him around anymore so maybe his antics caught up to him, or he's the chief of police now, lol.

I was shooting at the locals 1000Y spot out in the FS, a spot where the club had the annual 1000Y match and also where everyone went to shoot long range, we even had insurance for our matches. A FS cop pulls up and gives me a citation for shooting across a road. That one was a bitch!

Shall I go on... I'm almost afraid to leave the house, lol, but I'm sure they'd just show and get me there too. Police magnet out.

 

[Precision Underground]

Something not adding up here as I figured. OP said he picked up the girls as they were walking to Walmart. A few pages later he says the cop stopped him 6 miles from where he picked them up. Were they walking over 6 miles to Walmart after midnight? If so I can think of all kinds of scenarios that make the cop even more correct here...

 

[Precision Underground]

This right here is BS, there’s a fine line between doing your job and harassing people. What is your 26 years relative was with his 17 year old sister and her friend?

What if you were a little older and they are all your kids....this is 100% BS.... no improper dressing, drugs or maybe you picked them up at a bad part of town.. not buying the goodie goodie cop thing.

Was there a minor female in the vehicle with a 33 yr old male she didn’t know? Yep. You are speaking in what ifs when the cop had it pegged for exactly what it was, a minor female in the vehicle with a 33 yr old male she didn’t know. He investigated and checked with the girl’s father and let them on their way. Damn good job.

 

[1J04]

You didn't imprison them in the Galag did you ? Cinderblocks and Tan prison paint in the background......sure looks suspicious

You my friend have a creepy good eye.

 

[1J04]

The pup on the back row far left.. def on something ! Pat that mofo down and we’ll make some bread off this deal.

Fuck! We need a Greg if we want any chance at winning

That's Hilarious. Nice Job !!!! Geezus I love this place.

 

[Mike 556]

https://www.google.com/search?q=breakin+the+law+judas+priest&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari

Hey 1j04, don't got no horse in this cluster fuck, but I figured I'll help get You to Pg.5
Mike

 

[1J04]

https://www.google.com/search?q=breakin+the+law+judas+priest&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari

Hey 1j04, don't got no horse in this cluster fuck, but I figured I'll help get You to Pg.5
Mike

You'd da man Mikey. Brother helping Brothers. That's what we do......

 

[...]

I guess base in this we will all get pulled over very soon...I don’t drive around looking for strangers to pick up but ask yourself. What will chisus do if he saw kids that needs help? I have a good reason for lending another my hand and that should be enough for Leo. The moment I cant help whomever I choose, I am no longer free.

you can help who ever you damn well please.......dont break the law in the process and youll have nothing to worry about


that being said, if some "kids" need my help.....and their life isnt in immediate danger.....im not gonna let them in my car, ill call them a cab.


i find it odd that youd let someone in your car and not even ask their name.......but thats just me.......

 

[Dthomas3523]

I guess base in this we will all get pulled over very soon...I don’t drive around looking for strangers to pick up but ask yourself. What will chisus do if he saw kids that needs help? I have a good reason for lending another my hand and that should be enough for Leo. The moment I cant help whomever I choose, I am no longer free.

It was good enough for the LEO, he checked everything out and let him go. Of course he didn’t just take his word, he double checked.

I will forward you an email of a Nigerian Prince who needs help getting some money out of the bank. I’m sure you’ll take his word for it, like you’d expect a cop to take yours. ?

(Also, yes, based on this story, if you drive past a cop and don’t use your blinker, there’s a decent chance you’ll be stopped)

 

[CrazyHorse_mk14]

We’re not to five yet? Fuckin shit! I’m disappointed! Between the puppies and Judas Priest I was sure a few pages of bullshit would follow.

Guess I’ll leave work and go home! If y’all don’t hear from me it’s because I decided to play sovereign citizen with the law that’s out to get me .

 

[Gunfighter14e2]

Lame ass thread, if it can't make it to 5

 

[Spblademaker]

We’re not to five yet? Fuckin shit! I’m disappointed! Between the puppies and Judas Priest I was sure a few pages of bullshit would follow.

Guess I’ll leave work and go home! If y’all don’t hear from me it’s because I decided to play sovereign citizen with the law that’s out to get me .

You would have gotten a lot farther in life if everyone wasn’t out to get you. ?

 

[Deleted member 10043]

Something not adding up here as I figured. OP said he picked up the girls as they were walking to Walmart. A few pages later he says the cop stopped him 6 miles from where he picked them up. Were they walking over 6 miles to Walmart after midnight? If so I can think of all kinds of scenarios that make the cop even more correct here...

The OP lost all credibility.

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

Hardly an “officer of the state”..... go due some research on here before you open your whiney bitch mouth again.......it’ll keep you from looking like a moron in the future

You’ll honestly have a hard time finding someone who supports personal liberty more than me......

But you’re just being an obnoxious cunt looking to bitch

Dont wanna get questioned by the cops..... don’t break the law dumbass

Damn I bet you got some purdy lips with a mouth like that.
I guess cluing you in on your wayward daughter touched a nerve?
Your reading comprehension is below par. I said it was a guess.
Shit I didn't even get another cool internet MEME. I am sorely disappointed in that.

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

I am back, Bitches. This thing will go beyond 5 iffin ya got a set.

 

[...]

Damn I bet you got some purdy lips with a mouth like that.
I guess cluing you in on your wayward daughter touched a nerve?
Your reading comprehension is below par. I said it was a guess.
Shit I didn't even get another cool internet MEME. I am sorely disappointed in that.

well i dont have kids yet....so no nerves touched here...

im not really sure why you seem to eager to touch other mens "nerves"......probably for the same reason you like fantasizing about their lips.

 

[...]

random tit post

 

[...]

aaaaand page 5

 

[Threadcutter308]

You my friend have a creepy good eye.

Puppies ?.........fuk, it had to be puppies.......

 

[DarnYankeeUSMC]

You'll probably have to get the good officer Thomas to take me off ignore. I am sure some good banter with his kick ass take names attitude will blow this to at least 6 pages.