So apparently, the Russians, using conscripted criminals, and untrained imbeciles, with no armor, tattered clothing, plummeting morale, starving, equipped with WWII rifles and flintlocks, with no ammo, rusted hulks of cold-war equipment, and outdated systems, are defeating Western super-tech of HIMARS, AWACS, Javelins, Patriots, Leopard and Abrams tanks, mercenary armies of true "operators" and have ground through a couple hundred thousand of Ukraine soldiers and wiped out the entire Ukraine air force...or, all this talk of "outdated" is a lie, misinformed, speculative assumption, or all this "advanced" MIC tech is just a massive cash-grab scam that offers little-to-nothing in the form of actual military superiority. Which is it?
I think your assessment is very surface level.
And what outdated tech is defeating the more advanced tech to what degree and significance? Everything has a failure rate or chance of intercept. Some of those success or failure rates being higher or lower depending on the system it is engaging.
Javelins: have wrecked havoc on Russian tanks and T-14s haven’t even showed face on the front.
Stingers: have downed cruise missiles, helos, and jets
HIMARS: have forced cause Russians to move certain equipment/depots away from the front.
M777: you can fire a few volleys from those, shoot and scoot, and hit a target precisely and move before counter battery fire starts. Using artillery as a precision guided munition vs a barrage attack. Depending on the munition you don’t need accuracy by volume. Lol
AWACS: not tracking AWACS in Ukraine, just Russian AWACS in Belarus and Russia. A NATO RC-135 River Joints in the Black Sea.
Probably flying sorties on the borders too, but I have no confirmation on that.
Abrams/Challengers/Leopards: don’t have enough data on those in Ukraine to give an intelligent response.
Old tech can defeat new if the user of the new tech just doesn’t utilize the capability correctly, by chance. I’m sure you could probably get a T-70 to defeat a modern Abrams if the the user of the Abrams employed it like an idiot.
Example: using a hypersonic practically like a ballistic missile. If you use a hypersonic like that then there isn’t much of a benefit to it other than the added speed.
Old tech can also be modified to be newer-ish. Example being the Soviet drones the Ukrainians retrofitted.
Newer tech also in some cases adds counter measures to a newer threat or to counter, counter measures for a target.It’s a constant race.