Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestIMHO its a good idea to increase in target resulution. Post a 1" pastie to get ~true 2MOA mark. Or re-print out scaled version. Whichever is easiest. In long run shooting diamonds is harder than equivalent-sized circles FWIW.If shooting a 22lr are targets supposed to be at 100 yards or 50% smaller at 50 yards. I've been shooting regular size target at 50 yards.
Good shooting!My very first Kraft. Untimed. Off a homemade barricade. Factory Tikka CTR in 6.5 with a SWFA 10X.
View attachment 7801094
That’s good work.First go at the Kraft challenge
Thinking I need to raise my butt pad slightly to mitigate the “dip” in recoil to avoid the high shot group.
Shot with my 6.5 creedmoor
Any suggestions are welcome! Pick me apart gents.
Zero was about half a tenth left with perfect elevation and was .278” with three shots.View attachment 7745525View attachment 7745526
Check out his podcasts. He said start at 25 then go to 50 yards with 22zI am going out to shoot the Kraft target today is the target on Chris’s website the same for rimfire ? Seems like someone posted a rimfire specific one, but I’m not a 100 percent on that. Or should I just shoot the one that looks like everyone else’s here ? Thanks
IIRC Its to illustrate that your 'general accuracy' as a 'rifleman' or 'precision shooter' should be measured across all disciplines.Did I miss somewhere why this is shot on one single target versus different targets for different positions (standing, kneeling, sitting, prone) where as shooting them on different targets for each position which could give valuable feedback to the shooter that they are doing something different in each position that shows up on paper?
I get the total aggregate of all data in one target of all shots, but the thought crossed my mind about why/shooting them separate. Didn't know if this was discussed somewhere by Chris, or not. Figured I'd ask.
There is a positional target to do exactly as you describeDid I miss somewhere why this is shot on one single target versus different targets for different positions (standing, kneeling, sitting, prone) where as shooting them on different targets for each position which could give valuable feedback to the shooter that they are doing something different in each position that shows up on paper?
I get the total aggregate of all data in one target of all shots, but the thought crossed my mind about why/shooting them separate. Didn't know if this was discussed somewhere by Chris, or not. Figured I'd ask.
I believe then I missed a portion of the information then.There is a positional target to do exactly as you describe
If you go to RifleKraft.com and look at target selection there is an option for the positional target.Did I miss somewhere why this is shot on one single target versus different targets for different positions (standing, kneeling, sitting, prone) where as shooting them on different targets for each position which could give valuable feedback to the shooter that they are doing something different in each position that shows up on paper?
I get the total aggregate of all data in one target of all shots, but the thought crossed my mind about why/shooting them separate. Didn't know if this was discussed somewhere by Chris, or not. Figured I'd ask.
They can be printed off his site.I believe then I missed a portion of the information then.
I asked after wondering that, and then seeing some targets that had that, but didn't know if they were home grown, or part of the Kraft drills that Chris developed.
Reference link to the targets?
The missing link! Thanks!If you go to RifleKraft.com and look at target selection there is an option for the positional target.
Okami,Is the riflekraft.com page closed for non us people??
I no longer se shit when I'm logged in, just a black page with white topo lines... been like this for a good few months now...
Messaged Chris way back and got a reply that the tec people would look in to it, haven't heard anything after that.
Try typing riflekraft.com/logout in and log back in.I'm located in Sweden.
I have tried it on my PC in Chrome, Firefox and Edge. And on my phone and on a Samsung Tab.
I suppose to look at your raw accuracy performance "the shooter" you could do that, but realistically you and the rifle are a system. The Kraft gives you an idea what size target you can expect to reliably hit with a good wind call. That'll include your rifles inherent accuracy/precision. I include it because I like knowing that when I build a position on a target, if it's 2moa I've got almost 100% chance I'll impact it with a good wind call. But the drill also shows what percentage of shots that went into your main "cluster" group. So 80-85% of shot's go into 1moa or less for me regardless of position. The other 15-20% error will fall somewhere still in that 2 minute zone.So with this rifle I’m a 1.8 Moa shooter, granted I have only shot it one time.
With me on it, the rifle shoots .8 moa ish in the prone, Do you look at the the difference and take that in to account or just the overall result?
For example, if You were to average .5 moa with “X” rifle and shoot the Kraft target and average 1.5 moa… to me that means you’re a 1.5moa shooter with that rifle… that’s how we look at this correct?
The kraft score was originally reported as the diamond you shoot, its not MOA. If you are in 2 diamond, you are a '2'. But shooting 2MOA could easily score you a '3'diamond, because the Kraft target's diamonds are smaller than circles with the same max chord length. Btw, a 2 diamond score is very good.So with this rifle I’m a 1.8 Moa shooter, granted I have only shot it one time.