Re: LE Snipers Using Semi-Auto
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tactical</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
We use only force needed to take them into custody based on There Fng Actions.</div></div>
Is that right?
"Llovera was convicted of a <span style="font-weight: bold">misdemeanor</span> last year of attending a cockfight and has <span style="font-weight: bold">no history of owning weapons</span>."
That warrants armored vehicles and SWAT running all over the place? If that isn't state sponsored thuggery, I don't know what is.
WAKE UP!!
People are getting sick and goddamn tired of the police acting as if they have the "right" to put the ease with which they might do part of their job ahead of the safety of those you fucking serve. Your priority is ALWAYS to defer to the individual rights of citizens (even if it means putting yourself in danger), not just run around like stormtroopers and tell everyone they need to like it.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No one ever signed on to be shot . . .</div></div>
BULLSHIT!! That is EXACTLY what you signed up for. And if the choice is you getting shot or you deferring to the rights of citizens, your DUTY is to choose the former. Every. Fucking. Time.
Per your OATH:
"I WILL PRESERVE THE DIGNITY AND WILL RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS
. . .
I WILL FAITHFULLY OBEY THE ORDERS OF MY SUPERIORS AND WILL BE READY TO CONFRONT DANGER IN THE LINE OF DUTY"
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Now you suggest the cops you treat you like your innnocent until proven guilty?</div></div>
I don't suggest it. THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION DEMANDS IT!!! It is also solidified as such with a very long and edifying history of the idea of innocent until proven guilty over 100 fucking years ago in Coffin v United States.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tactical</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
We use only force needed to take them into custody based on There Fng Actions.</div></div>
Is that right?
"Llovera was convicted of a <span style="font-weight: bold">misdemeanor</span> last year of attending a cockfight and has <span style="font-weight: bold">no history of owning weapons</span>."
That warrants armored vehicles and SWAT running all over the place? If that isn't state sponsored thuggery, I don't know what is.
WAKE UP!!
People are getting sick and goddamn tired of the police acting as if they have the "right" to put the ease with which they might do part of their job ahead of the safety of those you fucking serve. Your priority is ALWAYS to defer to the individual rights of citizens (even if it means putting yourself in danger), not just run around like stormtroopers and tell everyone they need to like it.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">No one ever signed on to be shot . . .</div></div>
BULLSHIT!! That is EXACTLY what you signed up for. And if the choice is you getting shot or you deferring to the rights of citizens, your DUTY is to choose the former. Every. Fucking. Time.
Per your OATH:
"I WILL PRESERVE THE DIGNITY AND WILL RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF ALL INDIVIDUALS
. . .
I WILL FAITHFULLY OBEY THE ORDERS OF MY SUPERIORS AND WILL BE READY TO CONFRONT DANGER IN THE LINE OF DUTY"
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Now you suggest the cops you treat you like your innnocent until proven guilty?</div></div>
I don't suggest it. THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION DEMANDS IT!!! It is also solidified as such with a very long and edifying history of the idea of innocent until proven guilty over 100 fucking years ago in Coffin v United States.