Re: M40 Build Guide
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: m1sniper</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Well guys,I'm gonna be leaning on you all real heavy soon.My donor rifle arrived at the FFL Fri but I can't get there till Mon.I'm chewing my damn nails off.Gonna need some hard core opinions on her because the SN falls between the 2nd and 3rd known original M40 rifles according to Senichs list.Mine is 168,7xx.The original below mine is 168,346,,and the one above is 168,820.Since 168,346 is shown in Senich book,I'll be using that one as my main reference AND according to that rifle,I can save a fortune as it appears that one had a gloss black accurange scope.So,I guess I'll start with this,,who has used a barrel supplied by GAP,,and just how accurate is their barrel contour? If they parked for you,,was it green or green/gray? I'm hoping to park mine the same color you see on WW2 Remmy 1903A3s....I'm assuming that is the real and correct color???? In the pics the seller sent me,it appears it may have the clip slot cut in it,,but was partially hidden by the rear scope mount base.I'm guessing it's the plain square cut and not the type spec by the MC.Would this be right ? Barrel markings show it was made in Nov 65.Rifle is in .308,,,so I'm guessing that the 1st few original M40 rifles used receivers from about that same date??This sound correct? Please advise as this last question will help me determine what date code to stamp on a new barrel.I'm anal meticulous.
</div></div>
Welcome to the Rabbit Hole! Come'on down!
As far as what color the originals had, might I suggest going to the NRA website and watching the video on Chuck MaWhinney? There are some decent color photos showing the rifle as he had it in Vietnam. From what I could tell, it looked to me as though it was a dark Manganese park, with the bolt and bottom metal blued. The serial number would be in the correct overall range; certainly good enough for a clone IMHO, and being in .308 already will help with the bolt being right. There are some very slight differences in the early receivers compared to the later ones. The most noticeable is the receiver and bolt on the early ones do not have the anti-bind slot. Also check to see if yours comes with the short shroud on the bolt, the split sear trigger, and the correct safety. Any of these that are on it already will make the process that much easier for you. Also, the "Remington" script is slightly different on these than on the later ones. Might I suggest Mike Lau for getting the clip slot work performed? He did mine and I was very pleased with the result. (Enough so that I am planning on sending down my 1962 Winchester Model 70 .30-06 for one of his "Vietnam Sniper" conversions on it, as soon as funds allow) I didn't use the barrel supplied by GAP, so I can't attest to their product either way. Hopefully someone who has can chime in? I might also suggest contacting Stan at Douglas barrel, as mentioned earlier in this thread. In fact, wading through the 8 pages of this thread is a GREAT start to hit the ground running on the project. That, and getting two books by Peter Senich; "The one Round War" and "The Long Range War" are excellent sources of detailed info about these rifles and the context of their use in Vietnam if you don't have them already.