Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Out of the box,
![]()
I've had the 3-24X 42mm scope for over a year and even used on my MRAD 338LM for 6 months and moved it to my DTA SRS A1 with 338LM conversion and have fired over 3000 rounds of 338LM and several hundreds of rounds of 260 Rem and 308 with no issues whatsoever. Tracking is still spot on with great turret clicks and exceptional zero stop. I don't feel the 52mm versions is worth the extra money for me. The glass quality is right up there with the "Big Boys".I'm very much looking at this scope for a well balanced lighter weight tactical competition rifle (.260, 26" #6 GAP contour) to replace my S&B 3-20x50 as I move it over to an upcoming AI. My biggest concern is durability from it being so lightweight. In my mind there's built, over built and under built. I just want to know if it's the latter coming in at half the weight of the new Vortex.
Awesome, thanks bro. I think it will certainly be able to take the .260 I'll have it on! Bonus time is right around the corner and I've set aside a chunk for a top end scope. I'm looking at a non-illuminated x52 version for this one.I've had the 3-24X 42mm scope for over a year and even used on my MRAD 338LM for 6 months and moved it to my DTA SRS A1 with 338LM conversion and have fired over 3000 rounds of 338LM and several hundreds of rounds of 260 Rem and 308 with no issues whatsoever. Tracking is still spot on with great turret clicks and exceptional zero stop. I don't feel the 52mm versions is worth the extra money for me. The glass quality is right up there with the "Big Boys".
I think you'll find you love the floating dot center. Has never obscured anything I have shot at!Awesome, thanks bro. I think it will certainly be able to take the .260 I'll have it on! Bonus time is right around the corner and I've set aside a chunk for a top end scope. I'm looking at a non-illuminated x52 version for this one.
The reticle will be something for me to get used to as it will be my first try at a floating dot center, coming from currently running a H2CMR but still having extensive past with a standard mildot and similar styles. Those little .2 hash marks can spoil you though...
Thanks for the link,While a few of us are waiting on Frank to put this scope through its paces and come back with some more detailed observations, here is a recent review I found on the scope. I don't mean to hijack the thread, but this may whet the appetite of a few people until Frank can provide his thoughts:
The March 3 ? 24 x 52mm FFP Scope by Richard Wild | Target Shooter Magazine
I would love a March scope. But their reticles are horrible.
We may see a review from LL next month on it if he isn't too busy, but it seems he's been on the road for the last couple-few weeks from the sounds of his recent posts. It's well known he doesn't post anything definitive until he has put several hundred rounds under the belt of a new scope. For now I think we will have to be satisfied with his earlier post that he likes it much more than the x42 version.Paging Frank............
R
So did Lowlight ever post a review?
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
I am still working on it, and I am admittedly behind by about a month... with the work prior to the Scout.com move and my travels this summer it slowed me down quite a bit.
I will repeat,
I really like the March 3-24x52mm I know guys are huge fans of the 42mm but in my opinion, this is scope done right. It's much more forgiving and in that small package, it works on a host of smaller rifles we see.
I do have to email Kelby's about the question regarding the mils .. is it 6400 or 6283 ?
But overall, my experience has been good. Once the move is finished, I am gonna jump back on these, and unveil them on the new site, so my apologies for the delays