Hello
This is my first thread on this forum and I am looking for some ideas and advices.
I have made a number of prototypes for a new sniper scopemount.
The reason for this new mount is certain problems I have seen with current solutions.
The main problem as I have seen here in Europe where the PMll is the most common scope is partly the fact that the "ears" for the screws on the rings covers the vindage and parallax turrets and the lack of tube space for additional assesories.
The PMll has extremely short tube, and that is cousing problems on certain guns when there is a need for an angle cousine indicator.
A big issue for some countries have been that loads of scopes have been damaged during recoil from heavyer calibers, so my intenion is to have a stiff mount supporting the scope.
The first problems with the "screw ears" was solved by turning the split in 45 degrees.
The advantage is that it's now possible to see the low turrets on the PMll, as well as on other models.
Another positive thing is that the shooter gets vertical and horisontal lines, that will work as an small aid for him to not have the gun rotated when shooting.
The problem about the short tube with difficultis for additional assesories was solved by a number of interface surfaces. On those prototypes there is five interface surfaces, but I have planned two more on the front ring, one 12 o'clock and one 3 o'clock.
The rings are made very long to support the scope as much as possible during recoil and handling.
The ideas is to have easy mounting for extra sights, angle cousing indicators, lasers etc. I have yet not made a solution for the Simrad NV device, but it's coming.
Another problem with snipersights is the rotation.
And its always difficult to adjust the scope rotation.
So I have machined a 10 degree slant in the base, and is using a 10 degree gauge to get the rotation right.
The point about this is that a number of manufactures such as S&B, Hensoldt and Nightforce have their flat under the turrets indexed to the reticle and the turrets.
Instead of having a separate level I have so far included the level in the mount. In this one (on a DSR bullpup sniping rifle) the mount is that high that you can see it with your right eye, but in all other height you can easly see it with your left eye.
I have planned to make separate rings as well, as those bases are building height. It doesent matter when it comes to AR rifles and a lot of the seriouse sniping rifles, but when using a Remington or simliar rifle it does matter a lot and the height should be keept down.
But there is not separate rings finniched yet.
So my question to the members are :
What do you think?
Is there any other "whistle and Bells" that is missing?
Is here anything that is considered as unneccesary?
Those mounts have yet not reached production.
When they are in production, I am not going to do any direct civilian sale, and all sales are going through dealers, so this is not any advertisement.
If this thread is violating the rules by any means I donät mind at all to have it corrected or removed.
Håkan Spuhr
This is my first thread on this forum and I am looking for some ideas and advices.
I have made a number of prototypes for a new sniper scopemount.
The reason for this new mount is certain problems I have seen with current solutions.
The main problem as I have seen here in Europe where the PMll is the most common scope is partly the fact that the "ears" for the screws on the rings covers the vindage and parallax turrets and the lack of tube space for additional assesories.
The PMll has extremely short tube, and that is cousing problems on certain guns when there is a need for an angle cousine indicator.
A big issue for some countries have been that loads of scopes have been damaged during recoil from heavyer calibers, so my intenion is to have a stiff mount supporting the scope.
The first problems with the "screw ears" was solved by turning the split in 45 degrees.
The advantage is that it's now possible to see the low turrets on the PMll, as well as on other models.
Another positive thing is that the shooter gets vertical and horisontal lines, that will work as an small aid for him to not have the gun rotated when shooting.
The problem about the short tube with difficultis for additional assesories was solved by a number of interface surfaces. On those prototypes there is five interface surfaces, but I have planned two more on the front ring, one 12 o'clock and one 3 o'clock.
The rings are made very long to support the scope as much as possible during recoil and handling.
The ideas is to have easy mounting for extra sights, angle cousing indicators, lasers etc. I have yet not made a solution for the Simrad NV device, but it's coming.
Another problem with snipersights is the rotation.
And its always difficult to adjust the scope rotation.
So I have machined a 10 degree slant in the base, and is using a 10 degree gauge to get the rotation right.
The point about this is that a number of manufactures such as S&B, Hensoldt and Nightforce have their flat under the turrets indexed to the reticle and the turrets.
Instead of having a separate level I have so far included the level in the mount. In this one (on a DSR bullpup sniping rifle) the mount is that high that you can see it with your right eye, but in all other height you can easly see it with your left eye.
I have planned to make separate rings as well, as those bases are building height. It doesent matter when it comes to AR rifles and a lot of the seriouse sniping rifles, but when using a Remington or simliar rifle it does matter a lot and the height should be keept down.
But there is not separate rings finniched yet.
So my question to the members are :
What do you think?
Is there any other "whistle and Bells" that is missing?
Is here anything that is considered as unneccesary?
Those mounts have yet not reached production.
When they are in production, I am not going to do any direct civilian sale, and all sales are going through dealers, so this is not any advertisement.
If this thread is violating the rules by any means I donät mind at all to have it corrected or removed.
Håkan Spuhr