Re: My Hensoldt 4-16x56 FFP Review
Ask and you shall (kinda) receive - this is a 3-12X56 FFP. Took these yesterday in the late afternoon on a HOT day. The mirage was pretty intense and the wind was low. These pics are not perfect, I still get some aberration on the edges (all my fault, NOT the scope) but gives you an idea of just how clear and unobstructed a target is at 100, 600 and 1,000yds with a FFP and regular Mil-Dot even on very hot and bright day.
This is the range. The range goes to 600yds but the rock face (white patch in the hills almost dead center of the picture) is 1,000yds. Note the dust going straight up from a bullet impact. There was little to no wind.
Target at 100yds at 8x. In the center of the target is a black diamond that you can see. This diamon has 1" sides. It's possible to quarter the diamond with the reticle at 12X - my picture taking skills don't quite show this. I tried to take some at 12x but I kept getting major issues with the field of view on the camera - again, my lack of skill not the fault of the scope. Usually I can use the 12x to see the bullet holes in the orange (it's not a shoot'n'see target).
This red steel target is just over 600yds away. This is at 3x. The field of view, and the ability to see the target clearly is what I find impressive.
This is the same target at 12x
Here's the 1,000yd shot. The range only goes to 600 but I asked a guy there to range the rock face and he said it's 1,000. This is it at 12x
The key learning from my perspective is what Nathan told me when I asked whether he recommended the 3-12 or 4-16 for a .308. I wanted something that was the smallest and lightest scope but one that would never have me compromise on clarity, field of view and eye relief. On maximum magnification, on a 3-12 I feel I can do all that my rifle and cartridge are designed for, the rest will be down to me.