@LRBuck: That is great news that your rig is giving you good early results with factory ammo. Looking forward to hearing more.
@SBRSarge: I want to be careful and only relate my experience. I have 3 Ballistic Advantage barrels. The first was a SR25 6.5 Creedmoor barrel. It shoots in the .4s and .5s and has been a pleasure to own and shoot. I bought a 6.5 Grendel barrel from them and after some but not extensive load development I gave up. I couldn't get it to shoot under an MOA and lost interest in the project. So, we can't count that one as anything other than undetermined. I bought a 20" Ballistic Advantage DMR 6mm ARC barrel from Brownells in early June of this year. I tried as hard as I could to get the barrel to shoot under an MOA. Some groups would but there was no consistency. I contacted the Ballistic Advantage support line and they sent me an RMA for the barrel after several back and forth conversations. So, I would rate their customer service highly. I did not send the barrel in as I built a new barrel. In all fairness, there are other parts to an AR that have a big bearing on accuracy and it wouldn't be right of me to pass negative judgement on Ballistic Advantage barrels. I realize this isn't terribly helpful but they do have a sub-MOA guarantee and seem prepared to stand behind that.
@ormandj: I think we use a lot of tools in assembling and testing loads, some more accurate than others. Many of your thoughts resonate with me in that for most common cartridges there is a lot of experience and wisdom available about which powders to use and what muzzle velocities, in general, work for that cartridge. Initially, back in June, there was no info for the 6mm ARC. If one is a 6mm AR or FatRat shooter then you probably would have had a good idea of powder and where to start. I didn't. I don't think of QuickLoad as the source of truth but I do see it as another tool that can help narrow down powder choices and projectiles given the proper inputs gained from testing. I am not arguing and recognize that you are right but I wouldn't call QuickLoad flawed, I'd just say it needs to be tuned for your barrel and components and once that is done, it can offer some useful guidance. Or, maybe I am full of crap and just like to tinker with shooting stuff when not on the range
Hope you all have a great week!
Henry
@SBRSarge: I want to be careful and only relate my experience. I have 3 Ballistic Advantage barrels. The first was a SR25 6.5 Creedmoor barrel. It shoots in the .4s and .5s and has been a pleasure to own and shoot. I bought a 6.5 Grendel barrel from them and after some but not extensive load development I gave up. I couldn't get it to shoot under an MOA and lost interest in the project. So, we can't count that one as anything other than undetermined. I bought a 20" Ballistic Advantage DMR 6mm ARC barrel from Brownells in early June of this year. I tried as hard as I could to get the barrel to shoot under an MOA. Some groups would but there was no consistency. I contacted the Ballistic Advantage support line and they sent me an RMA for the barrel after several back and forth conversations. So, I would rate their customer service highly. I did not send the barrel in as I built a new barrel. In all fairness, there are other parts to an AR that have a big bearing on accuracy and it wouldn't be right of me to pass negative judgement on Ballistic Advantage barrels. I realize this isn't terribly helpful but they do have a sub-MOA guarantee and seem prepared to stand behind that.
@ormandj: I think we use a lot of tools in assembling and testing loads, some more accurate than others. Many of your thoughts resonate with me in that for most common cartridges there is a lot of experience and wisdom available about which powders to use and what muzzle velocities, in general, work for that cartridge. Initially, back in June, there was no info for the 6mm ARC. If one is a 6mm AR or FatRat shooter then you probably would have had a good idea of powder and where to start. I didn't. I don't think of QuickLoad as the source of truth but I do see it as another tool that can help narrow down powder choices and projectiles given the proper inputs gained from testing. I am not arguing and recognize that you are right but I wouldn't call QuickLoad flawed, I'd just say it needs to be tuned for your barrel and components and once that is done, it can offer some useful guidance. Or, maybe I am full of crap and just like to tinker with shooting stuff when not on the range
Hope you all have a great week!
Henry