Can’t wait to see a MS on the barrel, a garmin mounted on one side, and a LX mounted on the other side. Chrono fags are gonna blow a load when they see this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestIs 6 months supposed to be an impressive time frame? Because it’s not. The original has been out how many years and it still sucks so I’m supposed to believe they made an infinitely better product including app in 6 months time? Doubtful.
The parent company of Labradar is a big boy radar company. The tech and such has likely been available for a long time and they could have almost flipped a switch and had this going. But likely chose to wait until regular labradar sales dropped off or a competitor came to market.
They could have also very likely upgraded the Labradar and chose not to due to sales being fine.
That's not going to be a popular take by consumers, but strictly talking money, they chose to spend as little as neccesary.
Which is separate from MV or as LR usually labels it V0. Looks like per the first photo its also showing V10 which signifies 10y or 10m depending on how its setup. So you’re getting V0 and Vx.
Garmin is only MV.
And crush they did.The big mega corporation GARMIN rushed theirs to market before SHOT just to crush the little guy.
![]()
The parent company of Labradar is a big boy radar company.
Who?
I suspect it's to maintain radar alignment in order to more accurately measure downrange velocity.Why the peep sight, why would one need to aim their radar. Garmin figured it out. I don't even try to aim mine. Just point it down range. At least with the LR mounted to the rifle, it will always be aimed at the target. Probably be the only way you might be guaranteed to record all of your shots lol.
any idea how Garmin gets away without needing to aim it?I suspect it's to maintain radar alignment in order to more accurately measure downrange velocity.
If it wasn't included people would be bitching about that as well.I suspect it's to maintain radar alignment in order to more accurately measure downrange velocity.
Garmin can get away with it because it doesn't track nor provide downrange velocity, nor does it need to (for 99% of people's usage).any idea how Garmin gets away without needing to aim it?
Yeah I don’t give a shit about velocity other than at the muzzle and what I true down range with. When the Xero came out all the LR folks were shitting it for not giving info for downrange velocity.just move it 10 yards if that trivial information is that important
This looks like they lined up 10 units and made a shot ... 6 out of 10 units didn't pick it up and 3 out of 4 got different readings!
It’s reading the speed of the boot going up the product managers assThis looks like they lined up 10 units and made a shot ... 6 out of 10 units didn't pick it up and 3 out of 4 got different readings!
They were worth something after Garmin? People on here were giving them away to friends and family. I think one guy just left it at a range on purpose.Thank goodness I sold off my old Labradar when I did, they will be worth next to nothing now.
It's also useful for cast bullets that don't have a stated BC from the manufacturer. There's not a whole lot of people shooting cast bullets far enough to care, but for that small niche something like a Labradar is great. It's the only reason I didn't switch to a Garmin.Personally, the only time I can see downrange velocity (200yd+) being useful is precision rimfire for software truing, but these small consumer grade doppler radars aren't really up to the task to begin with and I suspect this new Labradar LX will be no different.
This looks like they lined up 10 units and made a shot ... 6 out of 10 units didn't pick it up and 3 out of 4 got different readings!
With an accurate muzzle velocity you can use apps to true your BC.What happens on paper matters. Your drop will tell you your BC.It's also useful for cast bullets that don't have a stated BC from the manufacturer. There's not a whole lot of people shooting cast bullets far enough to care, but for that small niche something like a Labradar is great. It's the only reason I didn't switch to a Garmin.
Why the hell is there so many buttons? Not to mention the damn permanent McDonald’s straw.
The ones that picked up the speed were on "bow" mode and the ones that didn't are on rifle mode. Not defending them, just pointing that out.This looks like they lined up 10 units and made a shot ... 6 out of 10 units didn't pick it up and 3 out of 4 got different readings!
It's easier to start with a decently accurate BC and MV then use the automatic MV correction on a Kestrel to true up the model based on the actual drop you see. You'll have to true it up regardless if what you're shooting. With most bullets the manufacturer lists a reasonably close BC. With cast bullets it's easy to calculate something good enough from V0 and V100.With an accurate muzzle velocity you can use apps to true your BC.What happens on paper matters. Your drop will tell you your BC.
I think one guy just left it at a range on purpose.
Legend. I've been thinking about putting a bullet in mine.
Seems like Polaroid/ Kodak moment for Labradar
Garmin can get away with it because it doesn't track nor provide downrange velocity, nor does it need to (for 99% of people's usage).
Personally, the only time I can see downrange velocity (200yd+) being useful is precision rimfire for software truing, but these small consumer grade doppler radars aren't really up to the task to begin with and I suspect this new Labradar LX will be no different.
You are not getting away with it , as folk from Andyscan have explained there are consequences to misalignment as in slight errors in velocity shown, all of these units will suffer the similar due to misalignment.any idea how Garmin gets away without needing to aim it?
your suggesting if I have 5 garmins setup on the bench all slightly angled differently they will all read different MV? id love to see that test.You are not getting away with it , as folk from Andyscan have explained there are consequences to misalignment as in slight errors in velocity shown, all of these units will suffer the similar due to misalignment.
You can smart ass all you want but a dude that is smarter than both of us and made first rifle mounted radar years before Garmin and Labradar, explained in a post how and why both offset and orientation can influence measurements.your suggesting if I have 5 garmins setup on the bench all slightly angled differently they will all read different MV? id love to see that test.
May I ask...where did you see any size information on the LR unit?Same money, larger size, smaller screen, shitty CS.