Hey all,
Recently replaced a Nikon Prostaff 3-9x40 with a Nikon Buckmasters 4.5-14x40SF Mildot on my 17HMR, and I'm regretting it.
The Buckmasters scope is really clear, but the field of view sucks and it looks like you're looking through a cardboard tube. Like looking down a tunnel almost. Best I can describe it.
I went small game hunting the past two days and I'm missing shots left and right and having a real hard time getting on target. I think the limited FOV and minimum 4.5x is whats screwing me up.
I opted for a higher magnification scope because longer shots on squirrels is kinda hard with 3-9x.
Can anyone tell me about the Monarch 3-12x42? I would love to see a trough the scope picture if you can get me one.
It seems like going back to 3x and a Nikoplex reticle vs. the mildot may help. But being that it's 3-12x, will it have the same tunnel vision issue as the Buckmasters 4.5-14?
Thanks for any help you can offer.
Recently replaced a Nikon Prostaff 3-9x40 with a Nikon Buckmasters 4.5-14x40SF Mildot on my 17HMR, and I'm regretting it.
The Buckmasters scope is really clear, but the field of view sucks and it looks like you're looking through a cardboard tube. Like looking down a tunnel almost. Best I can describe it.
I went small game hunting the past two days and I'm missing shots left and right and having a real hard time getting on target. I think the limited FOV and minimum 4.5x is whats screwing me up.
I opted for a higher magnification scope because longer shots on squirrels is kinda hard with 3-9x.
Can anyone tell me about the Monarch 3-12x42? I would love to see a trough the scope picture if you can get me one.
It seems like going back to 3x and a Nikoplex reticle vs. the mildot may help. But being that it's 3-12x, will it have the same tunnel vision issue as the Buckmasters 4.5-14?
Thanks for any help you can offer.