Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
6mm.Doug -
Thanks for the info.
Tried looking over their website to see what the main difference is on the 3-18x50 and 3-18x56 but on my phone it gives me a generic description.
If you have a better link or pdf. I would like to learn more about them
6mm.
More like 0.236”..... this is ’Merica
I had to laugh at myself as I "liked" gnochi's post... but then did the math For groove diameter of a barrel and the bullets we use, he's right, it's .243". But, for actual difference in 6mm diameters the difference is .236"...you guys made me think today?Touché
All 3-18x Optika scopes will have capped windage actuallyHighly interested in a 3-18 ffp to compare to my Zeiss v4
Almost a total lock on a pair of 8x42s at that price
I’ll add I think it would be a really really good option to have locking windage on an exposed turret. I’m simply not going to carry an exposed windage into the field on a hunt.
Optika scopes and binos should start shipping to dealers in about 2-3 weeksAny update on when this reticle will be available? Or what it will be called?
The "MRAD" reticle will be available on: 1-6x24 FFP, 3-18x50 FFP, 3-18x56 FFP, 4.5-27x50 FFP, 5-30x56 FFP (34mm tube)....so it will only be available on the FFP models now, was originally on some of the SFP version also, but they recently made a few tweaks to offerings in production.Soooo, which scope and which tree reticle is going to be available? Can someone post or link the actual reticle and details on scope spec? Didn't see what I was looking for on the Meopta site but I could have missed it.
And parallax down to what distance?
Other than the objective size being different, the 3-18x50 will have about twice as many reticle options available. Both are available in FFP and SFP. 3-18x56 has a lower parallax adjustment range of 10-infinity, 3-18x50 is 25-inf., which should make really no difference in shooting a firearm...although air gun folks prefer the lowest parallax setting possible. The SFP 3-18's will have both capped windage and elevation, FFP models have exposed elevation, capped windage.Doug -
Thanks for the info.
Tried looking over their website to see what the main difference is on the 3-18x50 and 3-18x56 but on my phone it gives me a generic description.
If you have a better link or pdf. I would like to learn more about them
All 3-18x Optika scopes will have capped windage actually
Right, which is why I’m interested in that one. Should have clarified I meant the upper tiers 4.5-27 and 5-30
Do you have ETA to dealers? Assuming definitely this year and maybe June/July target? These will be awesome for 22lr precision market. Sub 800 options with good glass, parallax down to 10-25 yards with a solid reticle!? Take my money.All,
Here is the latest info for turret configurations on each model. This should help clarify a lot...this is the correct info, regardless if the website says something different:
1-6x24 SFP, 2.5-15x44 SFP, 3-18x50 SFP, 3-18x56 SFP will all have capped windage and elevation
4.5-27x50 SFP, 4.5-27x50 FFP, 5-30x56 FFP will have exposed locking elevation with zero stop, and exposed windage
1-6x24 FFP will have exposed locking windage and elevation
3-18x50 FFP, 3-18x56 FFP will have exposed locking zero stop elevation and capped windage
I am trying to get good reticle images from Czech Republic for the new reticles (.223, .308, 6.5, MRAD) so as soon as I have them I will try to post as well.
The original ship target was late May/early June, and I'm told they are still on that timeline. I'm sure there will be a few weeks sliding either way one some of the models. Binos might come first or scopes first, I really don't know.Do you have ETA to dealers? Assuming definitely this year and maybe June/July target? These will be awesome for 22lr precision market. Sub 800 options with good glass, parallax down to 10-25 yards with a solid reticle!? Take my money.
If it's even near the PST Gen 2 or some of the mid/high end Athalons optically, it will be a great option for sure!!!
We often shoot a pair of RWS 460s which are legendary scope destroyers, I have been cycling in shitty Hawkes and other crap scopes that are lying around, and murdering them one by one. Windage will start moving over by multiple feet or the reticles will rotate internally in the scope. It's actually fun to see how long they'll go when you know up front that this will be their last meal. So I've destroyed my last shitty scope and am looking for The One that will not only survive, but handle both the close range gallery type shooting we do off the back porch at the end of a hunting day in failing light (or under spotlights), or the "chili can races" where we lob 22s into them at long range to "race" a couple cans across a hill, always a good time with underlevers in one hand and Mexican lagers in the other. That's where both the 10yd parallax AND the tree and dichro come in. So I'm really hoping for that magical combo of 10yd parallax, 56mm objective, mrad/dichro, and large mag range. The 5-30 is just a bit overkill for the close range shooting and size of the scope. Go 3-18!
Meopta lenses are held inside the scope tube by deep "slots" that are machined out and then fitted tightly in there. Most scopes' lenses are held in my some form or cement/epoxy/glue which is why they can be rattled around so easily. While I would definitely still default to speaking directly with Meopta's customer service people, this method makes this method does make their scopes much more robust tan most.That’s so true. My dad and I have some RWS 34’s, HW97’s, and PCP air guns. The stupid RWS 34’s are scope killers. Mine has killed 3-4 air gun rated scopes. Just killed a hammers “air gun” scope. I would love a great scope that works on a RWS 34.
Side note: I even tried a vortex 2-8 scope and killed it after 30 shots ... called before I used it and they said give it a go and they ended up replacing it but it was a good lesson to me.
What do the reticles look like for the FFP -“3-18x56?
If it goes does to 10 yards that would be beautiful for air guns and rimfires
$699.95 Non Illum: Z-Plex
$749.95 Illuminated: Z-Plus, BDC, MRAD (Mil/Mil)
$749.95 DicroTech: 4D, [MRAD (Mil/Mil)]
Pretty spot on. I think their target is much more Vortex Viper than S&B or even Razor. I think with that being the goal, and the level of glass historically that comes from the Meopro series, this will be successful given the price and feature set. I would love to see your reticle make it over to a side-parallax Meostar model with the feature set of the Optika's, at that point I think it could probably compete with anything south of $3k fairly handily. As for Dichro, if the transparency can be adjusted, I could see the ability to make a scope that acts quickly at low power using only the thicker dichro, with fine solid lines traced inside for precision shooting.Gentlemen, I scanned through the last couple of pages of this thread and figured I should attempt to sorta calm things down a little.
I expect these to be very good, but I do not think anyone here on this thread has seen a production model yet, me included. Only a couple of people posting here have seen dichrotech reticles in the flesh, so to speak, and we really have no idea yet how to use the technology best. I have some ideas that will probably be tried at some point and implementation I like will be tried on the 5-30x56, but it is new.
We have no idea how Optika6 will stack up and I do not want people to have unreasonable expectations that it will compete with S&B for under $1k. I will be overjoyed if it does, but I do not expect it to. I do expect it to punch above its weight class, but we will not know until the scopes are here.
What we do know is that Meopta is serious about being a major player across the entire spectrum of sporting optics. We also know that they have the technical capability to be a major player. And we know that they are listening to market feedback.
The reticle I designed for the 5-30x56 will be likely used in a couple of different designs and that is the reticle that popped up in this thread. Some people will like it and some will not, but I tried to incorporate the features that, in my estimation, most people asked for.
If if it is up your alley, give it a shot, try the scope, use it in the field and tell me how it works for you. If this reticle is a success for Meopta as I hope it will be, this will serve as validation for going to the end users for feedback and coming out with a successful product.
If we show this to be a viable way to influence product design, we will end up getting the products that we want.
ILya
Pretty spot on. I think their target is much more Vortex Viper than S&B or even Razor. I think with that being the goal, and the level of glass historically that comes from the Meopro series, this will be successful given the price and feature set. I would love to see your reticle make it over to a side-parallax Meostar model with the feature set of the Optika's, at that point I think it could probably compete with anything south of $3k fairly handily. As for Dichro, if the transparency can be adjusted, I could see the ability to make a scope that acts quickly at low power using only the thicker dichro, with fine solid lines traced inside for precision shooting.
One of the versions of the reticle I considered had thick dichro bars with thin lines in the middle, but after looking at the 3-12x56 with dichro reticle I scrapped that for now. Transparency can be adjusted in theory, but that would require some experiementation and I do not think they should be doing it yet.
As far as high end scopes go, I would like them to develop the MeoTac line a little more. That has a lot of potential.
ILya
The meotac is very interesting but always seemed way unmarketed. If they can improve it with this reticle tech and maybe expand the erector range I have a few short rifles it would suit very well.
Scanned through the thread but did not see an image of your reticle ILya, are you able to post and share the design? Of if I'm blind and did not see it, which post # is itGentlemen, I scanned through the last couple of pages of this thread and figured I should attempt to sorta calm things down a little.
I expect these to be very good, but I do not think anyone here on this thread has seen a production model yet, me included. Only a couple of people posting here have seen dichrotech reticles in the flesh, so to speak, and we really have no idea yet how to use the technology best. I have some ideas that will probably be tried at some point and implementation I like will be tried on the 5-30x56, but it is new.
We have no idea how Optika6 will stack up and I do not want people to have unreasonable expectations that it will compete with S&B for under $1k. I will be overjoyed if it does, but I do not expect it to. I do expect it to punch above its weight class, but we will not know until the scopes are here.
What we do know is that Meopta is serious about being a major player across the entire spectrum of sporting optics. We also know that they have the technical capability to be a major player. And we know that they are listening to market feedback.
The reticle I designed for the 5-30x56 will be likely used in a couple of different designs and that is the reticle that popped up in this thread. Some people will like it and some will not, but I tried to incorporate the features that, in my estimation, most people asked for.
If if it is up your alley, give it a shot, try the scope, use it in the field and tell me how it works for you. If this reticle is a success for Meopta as I hope it will be, this will serve as validation for going to the end users for feedback and coming out with a successful product.
If we show this to be a viable way to influence product design, we will end up getting the products that we want.
ILya
Scanned through the thread but did not see an image of your reticle ILya, are you able to post and share the design? Of if I'm blind and did not see it, which post # is it
MRAD1Burdy what's the name of that reticle?