Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Little dog that barks“Joseph rossenbaum wasn’t going to hurt anyone, he’s a mouthy little guy, he’s a little dog that barks”
Hmm tell that to the kids he raped
Can't. Forbidden by the Judge in the early proceedings.I'd hope the defense states his (Rosebud) past as a convicted felon with "mental" issues shows enough cause for the SD actions.
That’s why they got a faggot for a prosecutor he’s the only one that could say that with a straight face.......“Joseph rossenbaum wasn’t going to hurt anyone, he’s a mouthy little guy, he’s a little dog that barks”
Hmm tell that to the kids he raped
Yep. Catch-22.Alternate timeline: "The defendant purposely chose to load the most lethal possible ammunition .....called JA-CK-ET-ED Hollowpoints. These are DESIGNED.....to cause massive damage to the human body by exploding on contact with internal orangs. He could have chosen the less lethal bullets, BUT NO. He chose the most dangerous type of bullets to inflict the maximum amount of damage on his victims"
that's nuts as past behavior is a pretty good indicator of future behavior and that wreckless behavior led to him being aggressive and getting shot thankfullyCan't. Forbidden by the Judge in the early proceedings.
Pedos Previous actions have no bearing on what Kyle knew about pedo, so it is irrelevant in this case when he shot him.that's nuts as past behavior is a pretty good indicator of future behavior and that wreckless behavior led to him being aggressive and getting shot thankfully
Binger has been doxxed and one his email address has “fluffer” in the name.That’s why they got a faggot for a prosecutor he’s the only one that could say that with a straight face.......
If it were the other way around and pedo killed Kyle it most definitely would have been brought up for those reasons, and would have been admissiblethat's nuts as past behavior is a pretty good indicator of future behavior and that wreckless behavior led to him being aggressive and getting shot thankfully
He would get in more trouble if he told the truth.
No, I think legally it was the correct decision, based on discussions I've seen, else reversible error. However, the prosecution brought in his girlfriend as their own witness, and I believe she even stated that Rosenbaum did not spend that previous night at her place. Some lawyer discussion about that mentioned that a skilled defense could have used that to further probe, because the door was opened, about why that was, which would have uncovered that he had a restraining order due to violence against her, and that was the reason. That could have been followed up further, to demonstrate he was also on meds, then possibly the psyche hospitization the night before, etc., and that would have been the proper path to uncover all that. It was a mistake for the prosecution to bring her in for trial and it could have been skillfully exploited by a good defense, but that didn't happen.that's nuts as past behavior is a pretty good indicator of future behavior and that wreckless behavior led to him being aggressive and getting shot thankfully
missed opportunity for sureNo, I think legally it was the correct decision, based on discussions I've seen, else reversible error. However, the prosecution brought in his girlfriend as their own witness, and I believe she even stated that Rosenbaum did not spend that previous night at her place. Some lawyer discussion about that mentioned that a skilled defense could have used that to further probe, because the door was opened, about why that was, which would have uncovered that he had a restraining order due to violence against her, and that was the reason. That could have been followed up further, to demonstrate he was also on meds, then possibly the psyche hospitization the night before, etc., and that would have been the proper path to uncover all that. It was a mistake for the prosecution to bring her in for trial and it could have been skillfully exploited by a good defense, but that didn't happen.
That sort of evidence basically never comes in. It is basically the reason we have the rule of evidence that is the most litigated area of criminal trial evidence, and convictions are routinely reversed when that kind of evidence comes in. Go back about 20 pages and I discuss Rule 404(b). Propensity evidence is classic prohibited 404(b) evidence. Even if offered for a particular purpose, it is never permissible to argue that a person has a certain character trait and so he must be guilty, peaceful, etc., now.that's nuts as past behavior is a pretty good indicator of future behavior and that wreckless behavior led to him being aggressive and getting shot thankfully
Yep. Needs to keep that booger picker off the trigger. Basic firearms safety....typical.Charge Binger with reckless behavior.
![]()
Going down the character evidence rabbit hole would probably have been dangerous for both sides, no reason to go there. It'd just distract from what happened, and let's face it, this is a case where how to apply the rules to what happened means everything.No, I think legally it was the correct decision, based on discussions I've seen, else reversible error. However, the prosecution brought in his girlfriend as their own witness, and I believe she even stated that Rosenbaum did not spend that previous night at her place. Some lawyer discussion about that mentioned that a skilled defense could have used that to further probe, because the door was opened, about why that was, which would have uncovered that he had a restraining order due to violence against her, and that was the reason. That could have been followed up further, to demonstrate he was also on meds, then possibly the psyche hospitization the night before, etc., and that would have been the proper path to uncover all that. It was a mistake for the prosecution to bring her in for trial and it could have been skillfully exploited by a good defense, but that didn't happen.
gotcha, makes sense from a legal standpoint but what about it leading to decision making? I'm not a lawyer obviouslyPedos Previous actions have no bearing on what Kyle knew about pedo, so it is irrelevant in this case when he shot him.
Pedos actions that night alone though earned him a permanent dirt nap and good riddance.
New graduate of the Alec Baldwin School of Gun Safety!Charge Binger with reckless behavior.
![]()
How about a;On a tangent, since we've recently gotten "Let's Go Brandon" lowers to hit the market, when can we see the "4DOORSMOREWHORES" lowers, as a nod to Kyle?
unbelievable, they ought to throw out the whole mess given the stupidity on displayRichards just called the gun an AR-14.![]()
Perfect. I was also thinking Friendly for a switch marker, but couldn't think of the other two...well done!How about a;
Friendly
Mostly Peaceful
Find Out
He was reading prosecutors opening statement.Richards just called the gun an AR-14.![]()
Oh boy....We switched to Gatorade....Shit's getting serious....LOL