Rittenhouse Trial
- Thread starter hollowoutadime
- Start date
Looks to me like there's no doubt he tried to retreat from his assailants after he was trying to render aid.
Should never make to the jury. Just should dismiss all charges with prejudice.
Should never make to the jury. Just should dismiss all charges with prejudice.
Wow
Is this on youtube so it could be downloaded from invideous?
I'd really like to see that in slow motion, is that IR or SWIR?
I need to check our NV section here.
I recall seeing that NV section long time ago where somebody threw a molotov cocktail at him, this was before the first shot.
It's a political prosecution because Rittenhouse simply defended himself, but the biggest reason- it was also Patriot Stuff.
Opening statement from the defense was way too fucking long! Only highlight for me was him dropping the hard R N-word even though the hard R wasn't used in the video evidence. 
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
A claim early on from lens flare from a crappy cellphone video. It was quickly debunked.
What IS new is a clear photo showing a chain in the pedo's hand.
It was a brick in a yellow plastic bag. Not flammable, but dangerous.
Can't believe the judge goes out of his way to tell everyone not to talk about the case on social media, but yet allows them to have their phones while the trial is going on.
Anyways, as far as I'm concerned today the prosecutors won the day. As much as I hate to admit it, the opening statement from the prosecutor was really good. Maybe I heard it wrong, but I think the defense said that Kyle was gonna testify. I really hope I heard wrong because that kid needs to keep his fucking mouth shut. He's 18 and stupid like we all were back then. Plus the guy who bought the gun for him has already thrown him under the bus to protect his own ass from the felonies he's charged with for buying the gun for a minor. I still feel this is an open and shut case for self defense and the drone IR footage literally didn't show anything other than Rittenhouse and Rosenbaum just happening to be running in the same direction and neither one looked like they were chasing eachother.
Anyways, as far as I'm concerned today the prosecutors won the day. As much as I hate to admit it, the opening statement from the prosecutor was really good. Maybe I heard it wrong, but I think the defense said that Kyle was gonna testify. I really hope I heard wrong because that kid needs to keep his fucking mouth shut. He's 18 and stupid like we all were back then. Plus the guy who bought the gun for him has already thrown him under the bus to protect his own ass from the felonies he's charged with for buying the gun for a minor. I still feel this is an open and shut case for self defense and the drone IR footage literally didn't show anything other than Rittenhouse and Rosenbaum just happening to be running in the same direction and neither one looked like they were chasing eachother.
You're stoned. Unless you mean the prosecutor did a great job making the defenses case for them.
No, unlike an Iranian whore I'm not stoned. The prosecutor was just plain awful during the motions hearing which is why I was surprised how well he did during opening statements of the trial. Hopefully the judge dismisses the curfew and possession charges so that way Kyle will be acquitted of all charges. Either way it's still not gonna stop the gun grabbers from continuing their frivolous war against the evil blacks rifles. Just remember this trial is only in the media because of the rifle used. Had it been any other type of gun, this thread wouldn't exist.
The FBI video clearly shows that Rittenhouse acted in self defense. He was chased, then he retreated from the rioters. The rioters became a murderous mob and Rittenhouse was forced to defend himself.
That's the way I saw day 1.
Last edited:
The curfew and possession charges aren't the concern and are trivial.
I even jumped to where the prosecutor starts for you, he was laughably bad at this:
I sure hope that the defense team has access to all the footage we saw today, but unedited. I find it very hard to believe that in this day and age where everyone is out vlogging, that no one captured what actually happened. We need to see all available footage unedited.
and the court video is embedded, it's clear you didn't watch the whole thing at either time.Oh yeah because Crowder the troll is such a credible source.
Don't you have some shotgun forums to go troll on?
crowder just lets others out themselves as idiots. kinda like you just did.Oh yeah because Crowder the troll is such a credible source.
and the prosecutor literally told the jury that st. kyle was chasing convicted child molester rosenbaum.
the "lost" fbi surveillance video proves he is a liar. if it wasn't for crowder, i might have missed that.
So in other words you'd rather get editorialized info instead of raw and unedited huh? Why am I not surprised.
no, just saying i wasn't able to watch or listen live, but somebody posted that crowder thing and i lucked out.So in other words you'd rather get editorialized info instead of raw and unedited huh? Why am I not surprised.
i shouldn't pretend to know much about him, but all i have seen is him putting a microphone in front of people and letting them say stupid shit.
It's called a street mace. One plastic bag (or several stuffed inside each other to hold weight) with a brick or two in it. Spin it to create a handle for slinging it into people. It makes a deadly weapon that can be tossed after use without getting much attention. Everyone here should know their tactics, it could save your life one day, or worse you may need to use them yourself.
You're such a tool, the only reason you thought the prosecutor did a good job is because he made your dick twitch with that GQ thing.Oh yeah because Crowder the troll is such a credible source.
God the only thing missing are the tortoise style glasses.
Guys, the bag the pedo threw is a non starter as a weapon, look at the trajectory, it air balled. Yeah it helps with an assault claim but that's it.
However... the pedo WAS armed, there is a very clear picture in the defense portion of the video, he had a chain in his other hand.
However... the pedo WAS armed, there is a very clear picture in the defense portion of the video, he had a chain in his other hand.
Well, I guess we are just gonna be looking at the trial different ways. I mentioned during the Chauvin trial that I have been studying criminal law in my spare time for the past couple years. So yeah, I look at this trial in a legal and professional way and avoid any type of prejudice so I can learn more. Trust me when I say watching this trial through the eyes of someone learning is way more interesting than just a casual viewer. Although jury selection is always boring as hell no matter how you look at it.
Prosecutor looks like a fucking sleazebag. If the jury is mostly women they probably think he's wonderful.
Defense called the aggressors "victims" twice in his opening statement. 
It's best to criticize what you can't have or don't understand and mock those that do!! Makes it easier to live in a penis colony.
Greg Gauthier on Gab: ''
Greg Gauthier on Gab: 'This should be grounds enough for completely dismissing the case. The destruction of exculpatory evidence is proof enough of malicious prosecution, in my book.'
I listened to the entire stream yesterday and have it on again this morning. I had no prior knowledge that the first witness for the prosecution was this blue falcon "brother" that used to date the sister.
The only place I see this going wrong is, he was a minor armed with a rifle he couldn't purchase himself, that makes the former friend a straw buyer at best and he is facing charges. Why that guy thought it was a good idea letting a 17 y/o take that rifle is beyond me.
And I have no idea why you'd go out into a riot to defend property that isn't owned by you nor a family member.
The shooting was self defense IMO, but I'm not sure that's enough. This is not the kind of 2A case I want to represent me. It's always some convoluted BS and now you're relying on a jury to comprehend it all.
The only place I see this going wrong is, he was a minor armed with a rifle he couldn't purchase himself, that makes the former friend a straw buyer at best and he is facing charges. Why that guy thought it was a good idea letting a 17 y/o take that rifle is beyond me.
And I have no idea why you'd go out into a riot to defend property that isn't owned by you nor a family member.
The shooting was self defense IMO, but I'm not sure that's enough. This is not the kind of 2A case I want to represent me. It's always some convoluted BS and now you're relying on a jury to comprehend it all.
In the minds of the overly sensitive and squeamish- virtually ZERO self defense shootings by LEOs and Civilians are "pure enough"- because there's always someone who will find an aspect of it that they'll use to justify condemning the shooter. It's just an emotional reaction by the oversensitive.
The cold hard truth is that our Founders by necessity caused British blood to flow freely and vice versa. Defensive shootings can also be bloody and cringe inducing- because that's the nature of this business. It's time for everyone to put their big boy pants on and stop being so sensitive and critical.
The cold hard truth is that our Founders by necessity caused British blood to flow freely and vice versa. Defensive shootings can also be bloody and cringe inducing- because that's the nature of this business. It's time for everyone to put their big boy pants on and stop being so sensitive and critical.
Last edited:
I completely disagree with your premise. You have Congress members stating they've never heard of a good guy with a gun stopping a bad guy and somehow he never heard of the guy in the Tx church that stopped a shooter with one shot.
These cases aren't going to make national news and that's the problem when you want your narrative to be "gun" violence. As useless as the NRA is these days literally every issue of the American Rifleman has multiple instances of self defense shooting which are clean and no charges are filed.
You cherry picked my reply to take it out of context... I edited my above comment for clarification of my point, which is that we in the gun community are too picky about which self defense shootings we'll support and which we'll condemn. In typical Republican fashion we don't stick together like our domestic enemies do. Please put me on your Ignore list. Thnx
LMAO, another personal sign of solidarity from Republicans. Oh you oversensitive Hide members.
I'd bet that you do not cringe about all the under age kids that lied about their age to fight in the WW's....my wife's grandpa being one.
I also question the basic premise of “why was he even there”
Kid…..KID was 17! If he gets ANY jail time his parents should each get double.
C'mon man! It was a completely different era. Do you even think there'd have been a trial in the 1940's? The entire town probably would've shot every little prick that tried to set anything on fire.
In this litigious society we find ourselves in TODAY, do you want to start off your self defense trial by shooting yourself in the foot?
What is the point of carrying a rifle to a riot if you didn't consider the possibility that you may use it? Or were you just "brandishing" it in the hope it would scare the bad people away? Maybe I'm just ignorant of the ROE in Kenosha and it's a great idea.
He's an American so he had every right to be there... the simple truth is that millions more of us need to start attending these 'protests' because they're domestic terrorists who need to be met in the streets by patriots with resolve.
Almost forgot.
ALL THOSE WHO WERE CALLING RITTENHOUSE A DOE DICK POS SPEAK UP NOW.
"To young for that rifle" ," in the wrong state" ," had no right to help protect businesses"
Spoke up for those in the back.
Saw it in the pit, don't be shy....
R
ALL THOSE WHO WERE CALLING RITTENHOUSE A DOE DICK POS SPEAK UP NOW.
"To young for that rifle" ," in the wrong state" ," had no right to help protect businesses"
Spoke up for those in the back.
Saw it in the pit, don't be shy....
R
You aren't ignorant. You just don't believe in people having the right to protect themselves.
Because those 4 additional months before he turned 18 would've made all the difference. He was old enough to join the military. The DA charged him as an adult as well, so clearly they consider him old enough to be responsible for his own actions. It's crazy that everyone here is unanimously opposed to the constant chipping away of the 2A, but now there's multiple people here acting like your Constitutional rights don't kick it until you turn 18.
OMFG, work for CNN or MSNBC much? I believe in the right of self defense. And the first part of believing that, is protecting my prison purse virginity by not putting myself into a questionable situation and using a gun.
So while I HOPE he isn't convicted I don't like the odds compared to three idiots in OK kick in your backdoor and you smoke them all with your AR, case closed. And the getaway driver gets convicted for murder.
I believe he was there to protect a building, but he stated that he would be their to help anyone who needed medical assistance. You can hear him call out to the masses in the video. He left his "post" to assist anyone who needed help. Probably wasn't the best idea but he had a pure heart. He didn't go looking for a fight, the fight came to him.
From what I've heard in the trial, it was the car lots which neither he nor his family have no interest in. The testimony yesterday is that he got a call from someone saying there's nobody at one of the car lots, he needs to go there with someone else to defend it. Yes, he's obviously carrying more than an IFAK and you've clearly heard him asking if anybody needs aid. But he didn't NEED to be there.
An argumentative prosecutor is going to say he came looking for a fight, with a rifle, and he found one. Your actions look a lot more virtuous with just a med kit. Of course, he might be dead then. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
