I've only done it twice now, but on top of the "plug" left from the first time around, I only need to add a small spoonful or two to get up to proper depth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeStill way cheaper than the next cheapest annealing machine. I'd hazard a guess that it's much more consistent than said machines too...
The reason it is cheaper, is because it lack automation. Its the equivalent of buying a simple propane torch and electric screw driver to anneal. I would hazard a guess, it is no more consistent than any of the machines. I am sure its more consistent than a screwdriver and touch. It may be more dummy proof, as far as nor ruining your brass goes, but it greatly slows work doing one process for five seconds per case. I run lots of 1k pieces of brass with 223, and 3-500 in bigger calibers. Not having to dedicate all that time to one process has saved me more time than the money was worth.
I checked the customs/import paperwork and found that it's a mix of potassium nitrate and sodium nitrate. Doing a little more research into molten salt annealing, I found commercial sources in the U.S., pulled up an MSDS for the same combo and found it to be roughly a 2 to 1 ratio with potassium nitrate the major component. I ordered pharmacy grade through Amazon, 2# PN and 1# SN for my additional mix. Should be enough to keep my pot going for many years.Where's the best deal on replacement salts?
But the AMP in its original configuration also lacks automation? Yes, with it you're paying for the tech and that's the best anneal you can get, but those guys are doing it by hand too. If I was running that much brass, I'd probably get something automated too, but I'm loading for one precision rifle and another varmint rifle. My annealing sessions will be 2-300 cases max and it doesn't take that long when you do two cases at a time and get in a rhythm. I don't mind extra time at the bench to cut a little cost, but I'm also a college student with not a lot to do in my free time (in the summer) besides shoot.
For doing large quantities like a thousand .223 it might be a bit slow but still not as slow as the torch method. Once the salt bath setup is temperature stabilized, I could easily process 300 rounds per hour with my salt bath system without setting off the CO detector.The reason it is cheaper, is because it lack automation. Its the equivalent of buying a simple propane torch and electric screw driver to anneal. I would hazard a guess, it is no more consistent than any of the machines. I am sure its more consistent than a screwdriver and touch. It may be more dummy proof, as far as nor ruining your brass goes, but it greatly slows work doing one process for five seconds per case. I run lots of 1k pieces of brass with 223, and 3-500 in bigger calibers. Not having to dedicate all that time to one process has saved me more time than the money was worth.
For doing large quantities like a thousand .223 it might be a bit slow but still not as slow as the torch method. Once the salt bath setup is temperature stabilized, I could easily process 300 rounds per hour with my salt bath system without setting off the CO detector.![]()
Someone needs to feed them into the hopper and dump the tray before it overflows and brass rolls off the bench onto the floor. Besides the Giraud instructions explicitly warn to not run it unattended.Its way slower than doing something else while my Giruad does them all.![]()
Someone needs to feed them into the hopper and dump the tray before it overflows and brass rolls off the bench onto the floor. Besides the Giraud instructions explicitly warn to not run it unattended.![]()
Guys who paid out the ass for an automated torch annealer are going to say their system is better, more consistent, faster, whatever adjective they like. Those of us who bought the salt bath system and have used it know what a good, and economical system it is.
Glad you clarified what you were trying to get across!OMG Some has to fill the machine, and collect the brass that it processed. Is that not what we are doing? I am not sure what you are getting at?
Leaving a machine "unattended" and doing something else while it does your work are not the same thing.
Glad you clarified what you were trying to get across!
Guys who paid out the ass for an automated torch annealer are going to say their system is better, more consistent, faster, whatever adjective they like. Those of us who bought the salt bath system and have used it know what a good, and economical system it is.
It is faster. You can't anneal a case as fast in salt bath, its simple physics. A flame is hotter.
Not as simple as you might think. Liquids transfer heat 25x better then air. I would estimate very similar times based on the propane annealing machines I’ve seen.
Everyone is saying 5 seconds on their salt bath system. My Giruad is generally around 3 seconds per cases. And I don't have to grab the next one. Or move the first one out of the way.
Water transfers heat 25x faster than air. Not all liquids have the same heat transfer rates.
I've only used my twice now, so maybe this will change, but so far, the salt shrinks away from the sides into a "puck" that I just dump out once its cooled.Biggest issue I have is getting the salt out after it has cooled. Best method I have found was letting it cool and reheating it on low just enough to loosen up. This method sucks so mostly stays in the melter and placed in a plastic bin once cooled. Anyone find a simpler way?
I've only used my twice now, so maybe this will change, but so far, the salt shrinks away from the sides into a "puck" that I just dump out once its cooled.
That’s correct not all liquids are the same.
But your ignorant statement about it’s faster because it’s hotter is simply your opinion.
I think there are certain benefits to both methods. Quantity being the main one..... automated process vs hand dipping. Never took sides, just correcting statement that would have to be proven by an engineer or chemist.
First it was ignorant, then it was an opinion. Can't be both. Then you claim to have corrected something that could only someone else would know. LOL. You just keep being special.
I've had the same experience - I just let it cool about an hour then cover with foil over night then dump the big puck out in the morning and store in a old coolwhip container.I've only used my twice now, so maybe this will change, but so far, the salt shrinks away from the sides into a "puck" that I just dump out once its cooled.
Do you need to use one for 308?I tried my salt bath Annealing kit today. It was easy to set up and use. I’m looking farward to swing if there is a noticeable benefit when shooting.
2x fires Lapua 308 brass and virgin 338 RCM brass for the test run. 5 seconds @ 500 C°
I used a cut down 30/30 brass to adjust the placement of annealing.
Figured I would share my experience with Salt Bath Annealing as annealing is something I wanted to do for a long time but the fire way seemed crude going the low cost way and a little expensive with me only needed to anneal a few hundred cases per year.
I saw the system you can buy online, but I like to do things myself so I bought the Lee melter on Amazon as well as a relay, temperature controller, and thermonuclear so that I could dial the temperature exactly where I wanted it and the controller would keep it there. I also bought the Sodium Nitrate and Potassium Nitrate salt online rather cheap and I use a 60 Sodium/40 Potassium mix based on some reading I did other places. Below is some pictures of my setup.
View attachment 7030377
View attachment 7030378
I typically set the temperature controller to 550 C and even with my processing brass it doesn't go below 510 C. The thermal couple is rated to 800 C.
For the jig or shell holder, I'm on my second design. I use a 4" diameter SS plate with one hole drilled to work with .223 based cases and drilled another hole to work with .308 based cases. I tried running a jig that allowed you to anneal two cases at once like some of the videos, but I found it harder to keep the correct dwell times. My top plate differs from others as it rests on the top of the melter with space cut out for the screws on the melter. I then have a sub-plate that is a stop for the cases that is attached with three SS screws. I added a screw and some nuts to reduce the depth on the .223 hole as you can see. I also drilled a hole for the thermal couple. I used a floor jack to make an indention in the middle so that the liquid salt would run back into the bath (first one I built ran over the side).
View attachment 7030384
View attachment 7030385
View attachment 7030386
For dwell time I use an app on my phone which will tick every 5 seconds (Metronome).
There are some changes I still want to make to the jig but overall the system works great and less then $100 into it. Below are some of the things I noticed about using the system.
Getting a splash of salt is similar to cooking bacon. Stings but I'll get over it.
I suggest de-priming before dipping it into the salt. I've had powder residue left in the shells that will burn do to the heat. The good news is with the shell plate covering all of the salt, it stays contained. I think the primers were also causing a vacuum and holding additional salt before I put it in the water which would cause a little splashing of hot liquid.
I use a cookie sheet to put the salt system in so that if any of the "lava" spills it is contained.
If the salt gets a little low on the case, I just weight out a few grams of the mixed salt and add it to the bath to bring the level up. I can do around 200 cases before needing to add 10 grams of more salt.
I know everyone says to take the salt puck out of the melter, but I just leave it in. Maybe it makes more cracking noises when I heat it again due to moisture, but otherwise no problem. I've left in in there for 4 months without issues. In fact, most of the times I leave my jig in the melter with the solid salt puck and don't worry about it. I consider the jig, melter, and salts to all be consumables that will need replacement sooner or later.
Like everyone else, after I dip the case in the salt I throw them in a bucket of water. After I'm done, the cases go into my SS wet tumbler for a quick rinse. Yes it is more steps, but doing things right typically is more steps.
Hopefully this helps other that want to start annealing. Yes automatic machines are great, but even if I had one I don't think I would set it up just to do 50 cases. This way I can process 50 cases in a few minutes when I come back from the range.
That sounds like an option I would like to try. Seeing how those kits are not in stock at the moment, I'll look into sourcing the glass bead blasting media. I have a Lee melter, just need to fab the stand for the shells which should not be too hard and buy the thermometer.I get the same result using fine glass bead blasting media in a Lee melter. 800 degree liquid scares me for some reason.
That sounds like an option I would like to try. Seeing how those kits are not in stock at the moment, I'll look into sourcing the glass bead blasting media. I have a Lee melter, just need to fab the stand for the shells which should not be too hard and buy the thermometer.
Any idea how many seconds at 800 degrees?
You guys are really over thinking this simple, safe, and proven process. The problems begin when you start experimenting. Take a look at the Lee melter, you would have to work to upset it. It's covered with a stainless plate so no dropping and splashing. you wear gloves and set a case in for 4 to 5 seconds and lift it out dropping into a bucket of water on the floor or in my case sitting in a desk drawer about a foot below the surface where the melter sits. And no wasted test brass.
Figured I would share my experience with Salt Bath Annealing as annealing is something I wanted to do for a long time but the fire way seemed crude going the low cost way and a little expensive with me only needed to anneal a few hundred cases per year.
I saw the system you can buy online, but I like to do things myself so I bought the Lee melter on Amazon as well as a relay, temperature controller, and thermonuclear so that I could dial the temperature exactly where I wanted it and the controller would keep it there. I also bought the Sodium Nitrate and Potassium Nitrate salt online rather cheap and I use a 60 Sodium/40 Potassium mix based on some reading I did other places. Below is some pictures of my setup.
View attachment 7030377
View attachment 7030378
I typically set the temperature controller to 550 C and even with my processing brass it doesn't go below 510 C. The thermal couple is rated to 800 C.
For the jig or shell holder, I'm on my second design. I use a 4" diameter SS plate with one hole drilled to work with .223 based cases and drilled another hole to work with .308 based cases. I tried running a jig that allowed you to anneal two cases at once like some of the videos, but I found it harder to keep the correct dwell times. My top plate differs from others as it rests on the top of the melter with space cut out for the screws on the melter. I then have a sub-plate that is a stop for the cases that is attached with three SS screws. I added a screw and some nuts to reduce the depth on the .223 hole as you can see. I also drilled a hole for the thermal couple. I used a floor jack to make an indention in the middle so that the liquid salt would run back into the bath (first one I built ran over the side).
View attachment 7030384
View attachment 7030385
View attachment 7030386
For dwell time I use an app on my phone which will tick every 5 seconds (Metronome).
There are some changes I still want to make to the jig but overall the system works great and less then $100 into it. Below are some of the things I noticed about using the system.
Getting a splash of salt is similar to cooking bacon. Stings but I'll get over it.
I suggest de-priming before dipping it into the salt. I've had powder residue left in the shells that will burn do to the heat. The good news is with the shell plate covering all of the salt, it stays contained. I think the primers were also causing a vacuum and holding additional salt before I put it in the water which would cause a little splashing of hot liquid.
I use a cookie sheet to put the salt system in so that if any of the "lava" spills it is contained.
If the salt gets a little low on the case, I just weight out a few grams of the mixed salt and add it to the bath to bring the level up. I can do around 200 cases before needing to add 10 grams of more salt.
I know everyone says to take the salt puck out of the melter, but I just leave it in. Maybe it makes more cracking noises when I heat it again due to moisture, but otherwise no problem. I've left in in there for 4 months without issues. In fact, most of the times I leave my jig in the melter with the solid salt puck and don't worry about it. I consider the jig, melter, and salts to all be consumables that will need replacement sooner or later.
Like everyone else, after I dip the case in the salt I throw them in a bucket of water. After I'm done, the cases go into my SS wet tumbler for a quick rinse. Yes it is more steps, but doing things right typically is more steps.
Hopefully this helps other that want to start annealing. Yes automatic machines are great, but even if I had one I don't think I would set it up just to do 50 cases. This way I can process 50 cases in a few minutes when I come back from the range.
I'll keep everyone updated on how long my system lasts. It actually seems like the more I use it the less corrosion forms. When I first tried it I didn't use it again for a couple of months and it formed some surface rust. In the last month I've been using it every weekend and it seems to have less corrosion on it.It would be interesting to track how long these things last. If the jig and melter are more or less consumable in this process. How long they last would be critical to how economical this is as system.