Anyone got any inside info on what’s coming? I’m personally hopeful for something in the FFP 2.5-15 crossover market.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why FFP for that mag range? It’s nice to have SFP for that low mag to be able to see a reticle, and 15 is the sweet spot for shooting long range so you’d just run it at that if shooting farAnyone got any inside info on what’s coming? I’m personally hopeful for something in the FFP 2.5-15 crossover market.
The RS 1.2 is doing well so far in durability testing: https://rokslide.com/forums/threads/maven-rs1-2-2-5-15x44mm-field-eval.338756/2.5 vs 3 is knit picking a bit, just a personal thing, 15x on the top is plenty imo. I wouldn’t want something more than a 6x erector. And I don’t really want more than 3x on the low end. 2.5/3x with a good reticle is for hunting in timber, not shooting at 100+ yards, that’s where the 15x comes in. 3-18 would be fine though. That’s why it’s a crossover scope. But there isn’t anything in that space I like. Burris XTR 3 sucks on 3.3x. Yeah it’s usable but just barely in the right conditions. I guess maven has the rs 1.2, I’m not crazy about the reticle but that’s about it in that space.
Oh I can’t wait to see how badly they Leupold this.Supposedly a new competition orientated optic from Leupold is getting announced.
Oh I can’t wait to see how badly they Leupold this.
Oohhhh I forgot about that aftermarket turret. If I ever get back in a MK5, that’s a given add-on.If its a Mk5 with a non-tree PR2 and a DI Precision windage turret, I'll be happy.
Anyone got any inside info on what’s coming? I’m personally hopeful for something in the FFP 2.5-15 crossover market.
SAC confirmed it’s a handle… press maybe?
I think its at least part of that, I think that scopes cleans up nicely with a non-tree reticle. Some great guys at Leupold too.If its a Mk5 with a non-tree PR2 and a DI Precision windage turret, I'll be happy.
I think he was referring to the Eotech that leaked earlier this week or was that SFP?Steve Fisher (Sentinel Concepts) announced a new 2-12x24 FFP scope via his instagram but wouldn't tell who was manufacturing it. Presuming it's getting announced at Shot Show.
I think he was referring to the Eotech that leaked earlier this week or was that SFP?
SAC press for 2k...
It's kinda sarcasm, but given Area419 and SAC seem to be in the "I can make it more expensive" camp.... I wouldn't be surprised.Did they raised prices already?
If we bought a booth…fucker is still stealing my moneyScott will be at the HOPLITE booth.
TBAC braked suppressor...
Leupold new spotting scope...
SAC press for 2k...
I really really…really want ski feet for my LRA. It’s a crime that they’ve never provided availability before.The LRA bipod guy told me that they’re going to release ski feet this month for their bigger bipod line. Lite-Tactical or whatever they confusingly call it. Not sure if this qualifies for Shot Show intel, but there you have it.
They might make ski feet for their small bipods if people ask for it (hint, hint).
Ah, you corrected it. And I agree. In that mag range for hunting, why is FFP needed?Why FFP for that mag range? It’s nice to have SFP for that low mag to be able to see a reticle, and 15 is the sweet spot for shooting long range so you’d just run it at that if shooting far
Obviously, this is 2nd hand info... But looks like a wider range of magnification, attachment points (LRF, RDS, etc), and possible reticle change.What’s the details on spotting scope? Never felt my mark 4 needed anything else unless they’re just putting some pic rails on it?
Obviously, this is 2nd hand info... But looks like a wider range of magnification, attachment points (LRF, RDS, etc), and possible reticle change.
I don’t know, but everyone here seems set on FFP for everything. I’m yet to meet a scenario I’m holding over on game. If I’m not shooting on 15x, I’m probably not shooting far enough to have to hold wind to .1 milI really really…really want ski feet for my LRA. It’s a crime that they’ve never provided availability before.
Ah, you corrected it. And I agree. In that mag range for hunting, why is FFP needed?
But I already bought a ZeroIt's kinda sarcasm, but given Area419 and SAC seem to be in the "I can make it more expensive" camp.... I wouldn't be surprised.
(I use and buy both brands. But at some point, it seems crazy to have those prices...)
I think a fair number of people like to shoot at 10-12x magnification to preserve FOV for spotting their shots, even for shots long enough to hold wind for. Especially since hunting rifles tend to be on the lighter side.I don’t know, but everyone here seems set on FFP for everything. I’m yet to meet a scenario I’m holding over on game. If I’m not shooting on 15x, I’m probably not shooting far enough to have to hold wind to .1 mil
I watch impacts frequently on 18x with my 300 wsm that’s 11 pounds. I also do the same with my 11 pound 6.5 creed NRL build with a 16x scopeI think a fair number of people like to shoot at 10-12x magnification to preserve FOV for spotting their shots. Especially since hunting rifles tend to be on the lighter side.
I'm not that passionate about it, just giving you some reasoning. Plus 11 pounds may be common for hunting rigs here but a lot of people like their hunting rifles to be 6-9 pounds. Again, just saying that's what most hunters go for. My hunting rifles happen to be heavy as hell.I watch impacts frequently on 18x with my 300 wsm that’s 11 pounds. I also do the same with my 11 pound 6.5 creed NRL build with a 16x scope
Everyone prefers slightly different things. If the reticle is done right and is usable throughout the entire mag range then FFP is superior imo. If SFP is your thing then have at it you’ve got a ton of options. There is definitely an untapped market for a FFP crossover design though. And I agree with @NateVA im one of those who will run below max at 10-12 on a 15-18x scope.I watch impacts frequently on 18x with my 300 wsm that’s 11 pounds. I also do the same with my 11 pound 6.5 creed NRL build with a 16x scope
Just as soon as the dustups in Uke and Gaza wind down a bit..........I had seen seen mentions/rumors late last year... Lapua officially announced they'll be making brass for 300WSM & 6GT
![]()
Lapua Announces Two Cartridge Cases: 300 WSM and 6mm GT
We are proud to announce the addition of .300 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) and 6mm GT cartridge cases to our product offering in 2024. Lapua cartridge cases are known to exceed the quality and…www.lapua.com
Bout damn time for the 300wsm. Shame that all brass makers want to kill it off.I had seen seen mentions/rumors late last year... Lapua officially announced they'll be making brass for 300WSM & 6GT
![]()
Lapua Announces Two Cartridge Cases: 300 WSM and 6mm GT
We are proud to announce the addition of .300 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM) and 6mm GT cartridge cases to our product offering in 2024. Lapua cartridge cases are known to exceed the quality and…www.lapua.com
What exactly are you looking for, there are a plethora of options in the 2.5/3.5 - 15/21 mag range.Anyone got any inside info on what’s coming? I’m personally hopeful for something in the FFP 2.5-15 crossover market.
I’d prefer below 3x or lower. While I’ve never owned a mark5hd I’ve read the reticle is too thin for hunting on 3.5x, I had a 4-16atacr and to me it wasn’t a good crossover option because you couldn’t use it until you hit 7x.What exactly are you looking for, there are a plethora of options in the 2.5/3.5 - 15/21 mag range.
The Apex hunter 3-15, Maven RS1.2 2.5-15x44, Delta 3.5-21x44, Mark5h 3.6-18x44 all fill these niche in slightly different ways.
I can't realistically see what more options you might want.
I’d prefer below 3x or lower. While I’ve never owned a mark5hd I’ve read the reticle is too thin for hunting on 3.5x, I had a 4-16atacr and to me it wasn’t a good crossover option because you couldn’t use it until you hit 7x.
I don’t like the reticle in the delta when on 3.5x. I’ve never heard of apex but it looks interesting. The maven also looks promising, while I don’t love the reticle, I don’t hate it either it looks usable. I wish they’d put a donut or something similar in it. It’d be nice to have more reticle choices. Heck if Burris just designed a new reticle and put it in the xtr3i with that fov I think they’d dominate that market.
Edit: here’s what’s I’d like in a reticle: thinner floating center cross for precision maybe .5 or so space around the cross before you start the rest of the reticle, either .2 or .5 mil wind hashes (most hunters probably prefer .5 I like .2 for targets but either is fine). Put a donut around the 2mil mark make it bolt enough easily see on low power. Illuminate the donut and inside the donut, not the entire reticle. Could go either way on a tree reticle, I would not illuminate the tree and maybe make the tree thinner so it disappears on low mag but is there on high mag.
4.5-18 at 27.5oz pr2 reticle looks pretty good to me.These are new and pretty cool.
Mark 4HD Riflescopes | Leupold
We’ve been making world-class optics that bear our family name for over 100 years. We honor that legacy every day as we design, machine and assemble…www.leupold.com
Leupold is off to a bad start lol. They have the objective size wrong on the 2.5-10x42 they have it showing 24 but on the spec sheet it is 42. No big few just pointing it out.
The TMR is almost as good as your gonna get for FFP and low mag visibility.I’d prefer below 3x or lower. While I’ve never owned a mark5hd I’ve read the reticle is too thin for hunting on 3.5x, I had a 4-16atacr and to me it wasn’t a good crossover option because you couldn’t use it until you hit 7x.
I don’t like the reticle in the delta when on 3.5x. I’ve never heard of apex but it looks interesting. The maven also looks promising, while I don’t love the reticle, I don’t hate it either it looks usable. I wish they’d put a donut or something similar in it. It’d be nice to have more reticle choices. Heck if Burris just designed a new reticle and put it in the xtr3i with that fov I think they’d dominate that market.
Edit: here’s what’s I’d like in a reticle: thinner floating center cross for precision maybe .5 or so space around the cross before you start the rest of the reticle, either .2 or .5 mil wind hashes (most hunters probably prefer .5 I like .2 for targets but either is fine). Put a donut around the 2mil mark make it bolt enough easily see on low power. Illuminate the donut and inside the donut, not the entire reticle. Could go either way on a tree reticle, I would not illuminate the tree and maybe make the tree thinner so it disappears on low mag but is there on high mag.
I think it’s doable in a FFP. Bushnell LRHS G2H almost nailed it. If they just added illumination to the 3-12, better fov it’d be about perfect.Why do you think a 2.5-15 FFP will be any different? Unless they make the reticle like .2mil thick you’re not going to pick it up easily on 2.5x.
If you want that mag range and want to use it well on the bottom end then buy a SFP optic.
I think it’s doable in a FFP. Bushnell LRHS G2H almost nailed it. If they just added illumination to the 3-12, better fov it’d be about perfect.