-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
STL McCloskeys served with search warrant
- Thread starter memyselfi
- Start date
Thank you so much SLPD, for taking these dangerous criminals and weapons off our streets. I feel so much safer now...
They took this man's rifle...
And the mobs all over the country knows where they live now...
FUCK... We might need to firemission our fellow members in that area to provide security for this couple's home and persons for the time being... I am not seeing anything good coming from this on the short run.
And the mobs all over the country knows where they live now...
FUCK... We might need to firemission our fellow members in that area to provide security for this couple's home and persons for the time being... I am not seeing anything good coming from this on the short run.
Shit such as this, is really going to open-up the proverbial "can-of-worms". Tic-Toc people. Mac
The police have already said they will not protect the couple. Now they take away their ability to protect themselves. Not good.
And the cunt would have been powerless if those cops had simply refused to carry out the illegal warrant. Tyrants only have power when they have others with guns to enforce their will......
So basically they are saying that they are fully in allegiance with the mobs that are destroying the country...
What the fuck do these idiots recommend as the legal alternative for this couple's supposed crime? Potentially dying inside their burning house as the mob decides to do whatever they want unchallenged? What continuing danger were they causing that justifies having their means of self defense seized?
Fucking down fucking world these days.
Fucking down fucking world these days.
Imagine that... rich leftist lawyers and their chickens coming home to roost.
Even though what this couple had done on their front yard resulted in a potentially violent situation being resolved mostly peacefully with nobody hurt on both sides, it seems like the leftist parasites want the alternative....
Fine. We will give them the alternative...
Set up a fatal funnel inside your house, preferably at the top of a staircase. Let the rioters enter and swarm in, and then light them the fuck up. Everybody who stepped inside dies. Any wounded rioters remaining get a hatchet through the skull. A few of these incidents happen and watch how fast the riots and looting stop...
Fine. We will give them the alternative...
Set up a fatal funnel inside your house, preferably at the top of a staircase. Let the rioters enter and swarm in, and then light them the fuck up. Everybody who stepped inside dies. Any wounded rioters remaining get a hatchet through the skull. A few of these incidents happen and watch how fast the riots and looting stop...
What would be really interesting is to know which political candidates the two attorney contributed Are they died in the wool Dems or did they just support maybe a friend who was one?
Regardless of how they vote and contribute they are still entitled to their rights and by all known knowledge they acted within their rights granted by castle doctrine/stand your ground in Missouri. Complete overreach of prosecutor.
Regardless of how they vote and contribute they are still entitled to their rights and by all known knowledge they acted within their rights granted by castle doctrine/stand your ground in Missouri. Complete overreach of prosecutor.
The idiot DA has probably just poked the wrong bear. I lived in Missouri for 20 years. They have been fairly successful civil rights attorneys in the dog-eat-dog St. Louis area, not some whiskey tango bubba. They may very possibly end up burning that goose-stepping socialist crotch-sniffer to the ground before it's over. And it will get really delicious if they're attacked in their home since they have the right to security. And they have no previous criminal record. You may hear that intruders were shot by private security breaking in the dwelling. If that home is damaged or they are hurt, you'll see St. Louis selling body parts to pay for that lawsuit...
Just following orders confiscating firearms, kids need shoes.
They let a mob ransack their house after all.
I am surprised there has not been an incident somewhere in the country for the left to push even harder against the 2nd Amendment. Whether real or staged.
It won't be long before the energy spent on pulling down statues needs to find another direction for the mob. A long hot summer with new virus lockdowns will spill even more anarchists into the streets.
It won't be long before the energy spent on pulling down statues needs to find another direction for the mob. A long hot summer with new virus lockdowns will spill even more anarchists into the streets.
Exactly! Unless the bad guys are wearing body-cams, they aren't going to get any imagery of the homeowners pouring lead inside their FPL.
The Marxist DA and the cops have just sent a message to the rest of the city and the world that they will use video against legitimate homeowners. Nothing good can happen when the homeowner steps outside their house.
That's why one should wait for the enemy to cross the FPL inside the doorway. Just saying.
Guess they should have been back on the porch, armed again.
There is no justice anymore. Current events proves that over and over again. It seems even the President is powerless to make things right. It is only a matter of time till they do this to someone who is willing to die rather than submit. Sad dangerous times.
A communist DA writes up the warrant. A communist judge signed off on it and the 1% carried it out.
Can anyone find a copy of the warrant? What charges were used to get the warrant?
Can anyone find a copy of the warrant? What charges were used to get the warrant?
Do you have some information about this couple to back up your accusations?
Maybe you could post a link?
Maybe you could post a link?
they are leftist lawyers who supported the undermining of 2nd amendment rights. they also were pointing the weapons at the people.....and in most places, that’s a crime most places that i’ve lived; up until someone starts breaking the law. these fuckwits had no clue what they were doing other than brandishing weapons.
i dont like the protesters, i have about zero doubt the couple were verbally threatened. IF I WERE MAKING THE RULES; if someone threatens you, you’d have the right to take that at face value and the use of force to stop them would be 100% justified. PERIOD.
all that being said....these cocksuckers are leftist scum, and it’s delicious to watch them get what they supported. let them get a good dose of their utopia. maybe if they see the downside of what they’ve wanted, and have to spend everything they have earned to bail their ass out of this mess, they will see the light.
they wont get a dime from me. if it was my ass in the sling, they damn sure would watch me burn.
i dont like the protesters, i have about zero doubt the couple were verbally threatened. IF I WERE MAKING THE RULES; if someone threatens you, you’d have the right to take that at face value and the use of force to stop them would be 100% justified. PERIOD.
all that being said....these cocksuckers are leftist scum, and it’s delicious to watch them get what they supported. let them get a good dose of their utopia. maybe if they see the downside of what they’ve wanted, and have to spend everything they have earned to bail their ass out of this mess, they will see the light.
they wont get a dime from me. if it was my ass in the sling, they damn sure would watch me burn.
You don't need charges to get a search warrant. Just a request to search for evidence in support of a crime there is probable cause to believe happened.
Probable cause means you're about 51% sure a crime occurred.
You are making the assumption that some of the previous gun related incidents were not planned.
Last edited:
Where are you getting the information that they are leftist anti 2A?
These protestors broke down a locked gate on their property and entered without permission.
I don't understand why they would be given a search warrant. There is video and public statements by them. It's clear they had firearms. I'm pretty sure I know why the da wanted a warrant - harassment.
This is a war on a culture. You are their enemy if you like private property rights, free market, and the open exchange of ideas.
So folks saying they want the McCloskeys eaten by they own....
1) What then about rule of law? Does it not apply now? What is the shoe was on the other foot? What if they had the LaRue "Extremely Right Wing" stickers on their car and this happened? Would certain people then be pissed? But not now, even though most believe they were in their right. This double think floors me and truly makes me wonder if people actually understand the concept of "law."
2) I'll grant that Mrs. McCloskey pointed her pistol at multiple people, but Mr. McCloskey was slightly better in this regard. However, I'll ask this. At what point then according to Missouri state law is it legal then to "point" and not just brandish? Some of those people were pretty close and being that it was a mob and mob mentality does the 7 yard "rule" hold muster? These are all questions that will be asked if this goes to trial.
3) Some quick research actually shows Mark McCloskey donated to Trump! How accurate that quick "duck duck" research is remains undetermined.
1) What then about rule of law? Does it not apply now? What is the shoe was on the other foot? What if they had the LaRue "Extremely Right Wing" stickers on their car and this happened? Would certain people then be pissed? But not now, even though most believe they were in their right. This double think floors me and truly makes me wonder if people actually understand the concept of "law."
2) I'll grant that Mrs. McCloskey pointed her pistol at multiple people, but Mr. McCloskey was slightly better in this regard. However, I'll ask this. At what point then according to Missouri state law is it legal then to "point" and not just brandish? Some of those people were pretty close and being that it was a mob and mob mentality does the 7 yard "rule" hold muster? These are all questions that will be asked if this goes to trial.
3) Some quick research actually shows Mark McCloskey donated to Trump! How accurate that quick "duck duck" research is remains undetermined.
I agree they brought this on themselves in a roundabout way but it would be us no doubt if we were in that position it doesn’t matter who they actually are it’s just a fact that anyone defending themselves or the second amendment would be targeted today
Hopefully this will open their eyes and bring them to our side it will be good for us to have such passionate attorneys who personally know what it’s like to join us and those people were committing crimes they were trespassing in a gated community and then entered the gate into the lawyers property but I guess that doesn’t really matter nowadays
The Federal Government’s true role is to protect our rights. The Federal government need to arrest her for felony civil rights violations.
This DA is an ethical and moral disgrace declining to prosecute egregious felonies when the criminal is black, and inventing crimes when the defendant is white.
She is Public Enemy Number One in the state of Missouri.
This DA is an ethical and moral disgrace declining to prosecute egregious felonies when the criminal is black, and inventing crimes when the defendant is white.
She is Public Enemy Number One in the state of Missouri.
That is the way it's supposed to work but that ain't how they roll.
You seem to have the same misunderstanding that I have - that English words have a definition that is commonly understood. In some not too uncommon cases a word will have more than one definition depending on how it is used. Yes, the word probable means more likely than not, i.e., greater than 50%. However if you are one of the robed tyrants, it is just like any other word. It can mean anything you want it to mean to rationalize the desired outcome.
Case in point, many states have DWI roadblocks that routinely detain and search people not "particularly described" in their warrant to yield DWI arrests of usually around 2% of the people detained. They might get another 1% for defaulted traffic or parking tickets. It stands to reason that the detention of 98% innocent people means they never met the probable cause threshold to begin with. Yet they continue. Judges keep issuing the warrants.
You can indict a ham sandwich. You can get a search warrant for any fishing expedition.
Because of the targets, this is one of those rare cases where those affidavits used to apply for the warrant and the reasoning to conclude probable are actually going to be scrutinized.
These wasn't simple trespass or protests. These was the same organized mob that had been rioting, committing arsons, vandalism and assaults and had publicly announced they were going to expand their mayhem to the suburbs with the law enforcement pretty much "giving them room to destroy" no doubt on specific instructions from their political masters. I'll bet those circumstances were omitted from the affidavit(s) and the judge that issued the warrant had no idea that any of this was going on.
Pass the popcorn please.
The 2nd, is the 2nd, period. It does not make one Iota of difference, R or D, you have the right to own/use a firearm to protect yourself and your family. As was mentioned, the protestors, were on their way to the Mayors house, breached the main gate to the gated community, then they broke thru the private gate of the homeowners. That in itself, would make me take a stand, firearm in hand (although I would NOT be pointing it at anyone) and make my presence known. Hopefully that would be enough to deter anyone that would have any other ideas, because I'm old, crippled and I believe I would feel very threatened at that point in the situation. No guarantees or F's given, after the decision has been made. Mac
Last edited:
i am going to reverse my earilier statement. based solely on me disliking district attorneys. dude is a lawyer, sue everyone involved in the shitshow. i still wont donate to the guy based on what is out there now. but yeah, file some lawsuits and i’ll throw my verbal support behind the guy.
there. happy? you cocksmokers finally won an internet arguement with another cocksmoker.
there. happy? you cocksmokers finally won an internet arguement with another cocksmoker.
Sounds like bad cops just protecting their job instead of the community that they swore an oath to protect
They'll get a jury of BLM supporters in addition to white guilt pussies.
They keep up these antics and they will also be the enemy from everyone. Right now we support them. I hope this will continue!
Where the fuck is the NRA in all of this? Shouldn’t they be swooping in to defend these people/funding the lawsuit?
Sounds like part of the plan. Anybody that doesn't cower down to the police violating your rights will be deemed a threat to society. So basically a police state is created without having to actually claim martial law.
Sure would be nice if the police would police their own and remove the bad apples permanently. Truly put the fear God and those that violate people's rights saying "just following orders".
Sure would be nice if the police would police their own and remove the bad apples permanently. Truly put the fear God and those that violate people's rights saying "just following orders".
I don’t live in that kind of shithole but if you try and disarm me on my own property while facing a mob I’m gonna take you out.
do these dem crap cities have any good cops left?
do these dem crap cities have any good cops left?
Again, where are the 2A lobbying groups? This a prime opportunity for them to step up to the plate.
Too busy soliciting funds and stuffing pockets...mostly their own.
Just shoot them all again who’s to say they didn’t die in the fire fight a hatchet would be the execution and then you would be the bad guy
Similar threads
