'The Hogg' gets one right.

Sorry, a broken clock is right twice a day.
Fuck both of these beta males.
In fact they could do each other.
SOP, include some "truth" in narrative to look credible.

R

While I agree with your opening salvo, Truth is truth no matter who speaks it. The shooters names should not be mentioned. Ever.
 
What are you gona do with your five minutes? Tactical baptism? Make him eat Tide Pods and condoms?
giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basher
He, and Anderson Cooper, are calling for the media not to publicize the names of the asswipes who do these mass shootings. No publicity for them, only swift justice. With that can agree.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/david-hogg-calls-media-stop-222047926.html

Whoopee dooo.....

One of my former jobs had me monitoring electronic media.....

So, it sounds real good calling on media to "be responsible".
And if they did, it would be but one small drop in the bucket.... and almost useless....

So, a case study.
X, a mildly bullied, introvert, challenged (c student), less than handsome, and sexually confused......
Starts electronic media communications, has a website, does Twitter, tweets.... does commentary, and......
(Heard saying, "I've got 400 followers and 1500 responses" l
And it was noted, his confidence grew, and his parents were proud that X was "becoming" something....

Time slipped on, and X was heard saying, "I've got 4,800 followers and 20,000 comments, I've got reviews, and I got to do an editorial for x-bart news"
And it was noted, his confidence grew, parents were proud.....

So, about his senior year, X was heard saying " I've got over 50k followers and 200,000 comments, I've got 500 reviews, and I've done an editorial a week, I'm in three newspapers......"

Sounds like a success story so far.... right ? Parents are almost orgasmic X is super kid, after all, they have heard "his" 50k, 200,000 comments, 500 reviews, success story" (from him) and they "see" him "something"..

Sounds real good, right ? But, remember, introvert, mildly bullied, challenged, less than handsome, and sexually confused....

So, X, all pumped up because of his electronic popularity, his parents orgasmic praise, and his "perceived" importance, asks the head cheerleader to the prom....

She told him no. She told her friends about it. Her stud boyfriend and his buds humiliated X.
X committed suicide.
A couple of X's electronic followers committed suicide because X did, one of them a younger sexually confused male who was involved electronically with X, and who was devastated X asked the girl out, then killed himself because she turned him down....

Parents were devastated. Investigation produced a book sized file of data from electronic communications that detailed the above and "the thought process" of X and his fellow suicides.

The electronic media communications of X and his followers was his world, totally apart from MSM, the cheerleaders world, his parents world, and for damn sure, my world (the investigator). He was not influenced by MSM...

He was a marginalized individual, with marginalized parents, living in a reality not in sync with the rest of us.

If MSN doesn't mention those people, what good is it going to do, if those 50k followers keep the chain going ??

If society's values don't find real places for marginalized people to fit in, they will fit in "in" electronic media that's a lot like video games... and about as real.

MSM, for sure needs to stop sensationalizing those losers, fer sure, but they will have to go much further in promoting positives, values, and good things.

But, that wouldn't be on their agenda, would it ?

David Hogg version is pushing the thought police further on us. Don't mention those killers, get everybody on board, then don't give the nra voice, then the rest of us.
 
Whoopee dooo.....

One of my former jobs had me monitoring electronic media.....

So, it sounds real good calling on media to "be responsible".
And if they did, it would be but one small drop in the bucket.... and almost useless....

So, a case study.
X, a mildly bullied, introvert, challenged (c student), less than handsome, and sexually confused......
Starts electronic media communications, has a website, does Twitter, tweets.... does commentary, and......
(Heard saying, "I've got 400 followers and 1500 responses" l
And it was noted, his confidence grew, and his parents were proud that X was "becoming" something....

Time slipped on, and X was heard saying, "I've got 4,800 followers and 20,000 comments, I've got reviews, and I got to do an editorial for x-bart news"
And it was noted, his confidence grew, parents were proud.....

So, about his senior year, X was heard saying " I've got over 50k followers and 200,000 comments, I've got 500 reviews, and I've done an editorial a week, I'm in three newspapers......"

Sounds like a success story so far.... right ? Parents are almost orgasmic X is super kid, after all, they have heard "his" 50k, 200,000 comments, 500 reviews, success story" (from him) and they "see" him "something"..

Sounds real good, right ? But, remember, introvert, mildly bullied, challenged, less than handsome, and sexually confused....

So, X, all pumped up because of his electronic popularity, his parents orgasmic praise, and his "perceived" importance, asks the head cheerleader to the prom....

She told him no. She told her friends about it. Her stud boyfriend and his buds humiliated X.
X committed suicide.
A couple of X's electronic followers committed suicide because X did, one of them a younger sexually confused male who was involved electronically with X, and who was devastated X asked the girl out, then killed himself because she turned him down....

Parents were devastated. Investigation produced a book sized file of data from electronic communications that detailed the above and "the thought process" of X and his fellow suicides.

The electronic media communications of X and his followers was his world, totally apart from MSM, the cheerleaders world, his parents world, and for damn sure, my world (the investigator). He was not influenced by MSM...

He was a marginalized individual, with marginalized parents, living in a reality not in sync with the rest of us.

If MSN doesn't mention those people, what good is it going to do, if those 50k followers keep the chain going ??

If society's values don't find real places for marginalized people to fit in, they will fit in "in" electronic media that's a lot like video games... and about as real.

MSM, for sure needs to stop sensationalizing those losers, fer sure, but they will have to go much further in promoting positives, values, and good things.

But, that wouldn't be on their agenda, would it ?

David Hogg version is pushing the thought police further on us. Don't mention those killers, get everybody on board, then don't give the nra voice, then the rest of us.
I don't say it should be a law or anything like that, just I'm not watching if they're going to sensationalize these deviant/misfit/looser/malfunctioning people and attack our rights at the same time.

I understand what you're saying, but you can't stop people from freely associating, even if it is unhealthy and they're living in a fantasyland rather than in reality.

My kid goes to horse camp next week. Of course, I wish they were teaching cavalry charges with multiple SA pistols, but I'll take the horsemanship and trail riding. He's doing all sorts of real (and real cool) stuff this Summer, and ZERO of that has to do with online or computers. He gets plenty of that crap during the school year.

When I was a kid I was just loose all summer wearing out bike tires and playing in the creek. My kid has a very scheduled and organized summer (momma is an accountant), and my expectation is that he experiences a lot more than I did, grows a lot more than I did, and hopefully matures a lot faster than I did (but, nature will probably beat nurture on that account).

I simply will not allow my kid to have enough screen time to do any of the crap you mention, period. What you're saying is the parents are encouraging it, which is insane. That kid would probably be with us today if the parents had gotten him a month at Outward Bound rather than some computer.
 
@Fig,
Yes..... you saw (and see) the same real the investigation showed, and you correct in your path to prevent that in you and your kids life.

There were no electronics when I grew up, tv after I was 14....
I had horses, cows, jeep, tractor, job, and a bunch of acres to fix fence on, when I grew up. And got my ass kicked to make good grades on top of horses, cows, jeep, tractor, and fence... and girls, and beer, and staying out of the hands of the deputies who didnt think 14 year olds should drink beer, drive jeeps, with a naked 14 year old girl sitting in his lap...

My world was definitely different.
 
Not publishing the names, might deal with .00001 of the eternity-seeking butt-pirates who are driven to go full-nar-nar with a weapon.

Hogg is a moron.

While I agree that stopping the action of publicizing the names is good... I don't think it will move the needle one bit.

The actions need to be taken LONG before these trenchcoat-wearing retards go into a school with daddy's shotgun....

Ollie has it right. Gun control is dealing with a minor symptom. The real disease runs far deeper. Names are also a minor little thing.

Parenting... needs to be the main part of this problem. Parents. The same Millenial retards who think their kids crap diamonds and are all princesses (guys included) are the problem here. Not names of the retard shooters.

This is a retard problem... not a 2A problem.

Sirhr
 
The problem with the annoying cunts on both the Left and the Right is that they want an instant solution to the problem. Fucking instant Liberal SJW gratification. The Left blames guns so they want them banned. The Right blames violent video games and wants them banned. THERE IS NO QUICK FIX FOR THIS PROBLEM YOU FUCKERS!!! This problem is gonna take another 1 or 2 generations to fix.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geno C.
The problem with the annoying cunts on both the Left and the Right is that they want an instant solution to the problem. Fucking instant Liberal SJW gratification. The Left blames guns so they want them banned. The Right blames violent video games and wants them banned. THERE IS NO QUICK FIX FOR THIS PROBLEM YOU FUCKERS!!! This problem is gonna take another 1 or 2 generations to fix.

You are 100 percent right. This is not video games. It's not guns.

It's a bunch of parents who have had their 1.2 kids... and those 1.2 kids are the center of the known universe... can do no wrong... are not ever a problem... and will be the super-spawn of parents who are probably crack babies themselves.

This is not a gun problem. It's not a video game problem. It's a PARENTING problem.

When are we going to start charging parents for raising retards? When we start doing that... parents will put their defective little 'tard in the drool academy.... not try and mainstream them and feed them lithium and hugs.

We have a retard problem in America. And a parents of retards... problem. Gun control and video game regulation (which is the stupidest idea since the Edsel) aren't going to do a thing.

Cheers,

Sirhr
 
You are 100 percent right. This is not video games. It's not guns.

It's a bunch of parents who have had their 1.2 kids... and those 1.2 kids are the center of the known universe... can do no wrong... are not ever a problem... and will be the super-spawn of parents who are probably crack babies themselves.

This is not a gun problem. It's not a video game problem. It's a PARENTING problem.

When are we going to start charging parents for raising retards? When we start doing that... parents will put their defective little 'tard in the drool academy.... not try and mainstream them and feed them lithium and hugs.

We have a retard problem in America. And a parents of retards... problem. Gun control and video game regulation (which is the stupidest idea since the Edsel) aren't going to do a thing.

Cheers,

Sirhr


Re: parenting, video games, and guns.
@sirhrmechanic @Maser

Parenting that fails to monitor their children , fails to nurture their children, fails to guide their children, and fails to teach their children life skills is 98% the problem.

The gun is merely the tool to accomplish a purpose.

The video game is a little different.
School Uses Video Games To Teach Thinking Skills : NPR
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128081896


Level Up: Using Video Games in the Classroom | Rubicon
https://www.rubicon.com/level-using-video-games-classroom/

The military and other entities use video and video game media to train.

IS and some others use video and video game media to radicalize.

Little johnny, unmonitored by parents, is taught and radicalized by sick angry thoughts, peer rejection, and violent video games that empower him. The repeated iterations of violent video games desensitize lj to violence, ie, stress inoculation-violence inoculation, until lj gets his tool, and acts out.

Back to poor parenting, no parenting....

Now, I can't pull the link, but today, our local channel 12 news published a study.
The gist.
The last 10 mass school shootings were white male, median to upper income, in smaller (9 of 10) less than 60,000 population township entities.
Study went on to touch on how smaller entities can enhance the events, vs gang and other violence of bigger cities.
WSFA: Mass school shootings mostly happening in small-town America
http://m.wsfa.com/wsfa/db/330846/content/tB9FhQd2

But, it all goes back to the home and parent thing....

Video game vs gun.... the video game is a proven interactive teacher, the gun is not, however both should be properly monitored along with little johnny...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rthur
Re: parenting, video games, and guns.
@sirhrmechanic @Maser

Parenting that fails to monitor their children , fails to nurture their children, fails to guide their children, and fails to teach their children life skills is 98% the problem.

The gun is merely the tool to accomplish a purpose.

The video game is a little different.
School Uses Video Games To Teach Thinking Skills : NPR
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128081896


Level Up: Using Video Games in the Classroom | Rubicon
https://www.rubicon.com/level-using-video-games-classroom/

The military and other entities use video and video game media to train.

IS and some others use video and video game media to radicalize.

Little johnny, unmonitored by parents, is taught and radicalized by sick angry thoughts, peer rejection, and violent video games that empower him. The repeated iterations of violent video games desensitize lj to violence, ie, stress inoculation-violence inoculation, until lj gets his tool, and acts out.

Back to poor parenting, no parenting....

Now, I can't pull the link, but today, our local channel 12 news published a study.
The gist.
The last 10 mass school shootings were white male, median to upper income, in smaller (9 of 10) less than 60,000 population township entities.
Study went on to touch on how smaller entities can enhance the events, vs gang and other violence of bigger cities.

But, it all goes back to the home and parent thing....

Video game vs gun.... the video game is a proven interactive teacher, the gun is not, however both should be properly monitored along with little johnny...
Proof of your concept.
Maser is a big gamer.
I rest my case.

R
 
Video games "can" enhance the violence that lurks within us all.
Was said in RVN by somebody I forget, "the deadliest, most violent, ugly thing is a 19 year old American turned loose with a m16". And that I have seen...

“Can” being the zinger. Lots of people “can” do bad things, but having a solid set of morals tells them that is not the right thing to do. When people lack morals there becomes an issue.


I would argue to the person who said that quote you posted.... “the deadliest, most violent, ugly thing is 19 men turned loose with airliners... and that I have seen”. I’m no mathematician, however I’m pretty sure every mass school shooting combined doesn’t even come close to a single day 17 years ago... the amount of school shootings, while higher than is should be, is minuscule in comparison to other causes of death.

This shit stuffer Hogg needs to run down a slip and slide into a wood chipper, do the world a favor and end that line of genetic code.
 
It's all about intentions.

Hogg wants us to not say their names just so they can continue to say it is a guns fault. They have to blame something so we should stop talking about the people that are the problem and instead direct every minute of TV time to hate on guns.

I don't think we need to publicize the names as it gives these losers the 15 minutes of fame they so desperately want.

just remember that even though an idea might be the right one, it is the intentions of the people that are enforcing that idea I am worried about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sean the Nailer
“Can” being the zinger. Lots of people “can” do bad things, but having a solid set of morals tells them that is not the right thing to do. When people lack morals there becomes an issue.QUOTE]


Fact. Everyday I want to throat punch left lane drivers, stupid people, Hillary Clinton, Bambi, and really everyone else that isn't asking me if I want to skip work and go drink beer. BUT..........my "Morals" tell me no and get the fuck back to work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hic28 and j-huskey