Rob has obviously spent enough time with the Burris and Tract scopes to provide a good overview. I spent about 15 minutes with them.
As a basis of comparison: with the exception of a ZCO 527 with MPCT2 reticle, my 5-year precision rifle journey has been solely with Vortex optics, starting with a couple of Strike Eagles on AR platforms, then a few Viper PSTs and a gen-1 Razor 5-20x50 on factory rifles, and finally three gen-2 4.5-27x56 and two gen-3 6-36x56 Razors on my customs. I did own Redfield and Burris scopes on field rifles back in the '80s and early '90s but they don't really count - different generation, different playing field.
The ZCO sets the bar for clarity (especially in challenging light conditions) and feel. The gen-3 Razor is surprisingly close to the ZCO and a notable improvement clarity-wise over the gen-2 - but both of my gen-3s are early ones with the gummy-feeling but usable turrets. Gen-2 turrets are great, as are the ZCO's.
With that baseline set, my impressions today:
Burris:
- Close to the gen-2 Razor overall. I didn't work with it long enough to really choose which one I would keep and use all else being equal.
- I liked the reticle - would definitely prefer it to the gen-2 and maybe the gen-3 reticle.
- I was "in the rifle" when I first reached for the parallax knob. My left hand went right to it but, when I turned it, the feel was so gritty with varying degrees of resistance that my head came up so I could see if I was actually turning a parallax knob. Ick. As Rob said, maybe it will improve with a little use.
- The magnification ring was fine - no negative impressions.
- Optical clarity on par with the gen-2. It was a very cloudy afternoon with occasional light mist, so not ideal for really digging into a comparison.
Tract:
As Rob said, the over-tight eye box gave me such a feeling of "optical claustrophobia" that nothing else mattered. Game over. The reticle was fine. But I have no memory of anything else because it felt like such a chore to "get into the eye box" that other factors didn't matter. I did play with the magnification ring to see if lower settings would deepen the eye box... no, not really; certainly not enough to matter
to me.
-------
The perceptions, especially first impressions, each of us has of has of different riflescopes are very personal things. I couldn't abide the Tract because of the eye box. Rob noted that other factors were favorable. [shrug] I don't disagree. But the Burris was quite acceptable, based on that first impression. Would be good to see both of them again in much better lighting conditions.
Fwiw. As always, enjoyed the range time with Rob.