Trump is back…the “Now What” thread

KUj7wYh4m6rr.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: Dawhit and WeR0206
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis

Luckily, this defendant seems to have had competent attorneys who filed a motion to exclude this video. The defendant’s lawyers argued that this video montage is highly prejudicial because it shows a jury a 22 minute video where all they see are the most extreme parts of the whole day, but the defendant in question is only on that videotape for six seconds and is seen walking around peacefully.

Further, attorneys for the defendant argued that the majority of the jury in Washington DC is made of a federal employees. This video is meant to inflame a jury, it has no probative value, and therefore is a violation of federal rule of evidence 401 (which by the way they teach like on the first day of criminal procedure in law school).

District Court Judge Bates declined the motion and allowed the prosecutor to include the video montage.
 
I hear all this talk and read about executive orders for deportation. That's all good.

What I want to know is if Trump and the rest of the GOP are going to stop giving free stuff and money to the illegals?

Every farmer knows that if you don't leave food out for stray cats and dogs, they won't come around. Keep the chickens in the coop so the coyotes and foxes won't get to them.