-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Trump is back…the “Now What” thread
- Thread starter D̷e̷v̷i̷l̷D̷o̷c̷A̷Z̷
- Start date
Hopefully this turns out better than I expect, but the proof will be in the pudding. She is going to review their positions in litigation, and we will soon see in briefing how the DOJ is addressing forced rest triggers, pistol braces, felons in possession, misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence, and so on.
I will be standing by to see how the DOJ position changes, if at all, in all 2A cases in which the DOJ is a party or filing amicus briefing in both civil and criminal cases.
I hope the rest of you will be as well.
In addition, many rules to review, firearm frame or receiver rule, pistol braces, dealers (not dealers so let's raid their house and shoot them and say they are dealers rule), etc.
Maybe 2(viii) will speed up transfers. It took me 3.5 months to have the ATF approval to have my silencers transferred to me.
Who is the Domestic Policy Advisor?
I will be standing by to see how the DOJ position changes, if at all, in all 2A cases in which the DOJ is a party or filing amicus briefing in both civil and criminal cases.
I hope the rest of you will be as well.
In addition, many rules to review, firearm frame or receiver rule, pistol braces, dealers (not dealers so let's raid their house and shoot them and say they are dealers rule), etc.
Maybe 2(viii) will speed up transfers. It took me 3.5 months to have the ATF approval to have my silencers transferred to me.
Who is the Domestic Policy Advisor?
Last edited:
One of the first cases to see if Bondi will do right will be the one against Matt Hoover and Kristopher Ervin.
Silencers
5th Circuit held Thursday that silencers are not protected by the Second Amendment at all, because they are not bearable arms.
I wonder what the new DOJ policy will be in this criminal prosecution and whether they will change their aggressive enforcement against Peterson after a "Second Amendment review?"
5th Circuit held Thursday that silencers are not protected by the Second Amendment at all, because they are not bearable arms.
I wonder what the new DOJ policy will be in this criminal prosecution and whether they will change their aggressive enforcement against Peterson after a "Second Amendment review?"
Then they shouldnt fall under the NFA and therefor not be regulated. Wouldnt that be awesome!
Yes, it would, but even the timid bill currently introduced places them under a NICS check like a firearm.
Ya why the hell are they regulated "TAXED" at all.
Seriously I would be pissed if someone used a silencer to off me.
Wait? They say you never here the one that gets you..
Subsonic anyone?
Will this effort that's underway deal with Federal park buildings such as visitor centers, restrooms, museums, gift shops, and remove the ban on carrying in those areas?
And what about Post Office Carry?
And what about Army Corps of Engineers land, and self-defense carry there? No more permission letters should be required to conceal carry a pistol, and the open carry ban should be lifted.
congress has the power to remove them. do it.
what an evil cunt. i hope she learns what hell is like.
musk has said that treasury dept staff has already agreed to make some recommended changes, despite the interference from partisan judges.
I'm a data guy, Read_Only is fine with me. I'll use that to extract then load it into another database where I have sys admin privileges. She is obviously not a data guy.
LOL, yeah, that is why I posted. The trend on the internet seems to be that folks think she cut off access, which is not really true. She did cut off the unfettered access, but not all of it.
BTW, Trump pardoned Paulette Harlow.
He is right if it is a legitimate power, but the executive is beholden to federal law.
I am not familiar enough with the legal arguments in the case above to know which is it, but I am sure we all will be soon enough.
I am not familiar enough with the legal arguments in the case above to know which is it, but I am sure we all will be soon enough.
So are there two cases and two judges???
they break it down into the number of taxpayers required to fund a program, based on ~$20k/yr in federal income taxes.
of course, almost half the voters pay no net federal income taxes, so many probably don't give a fuck except they could be getting more.
of course, almost half the voters pay no net federal income taxes, so many probably don't give a fuck except they could be getting more.
Officially the Gulf of America.
Suck it Mexico.
Suck it Mexico.
Feb 9th… its official.
Gulf of America Day, 2025
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION Today, I am very honored to recognize February 9, 2025, as the first ever Gulf of
www.whitehouse.gov
Similar threads
