Don't dismiss them so easily. People tend to change their politics when things get real and it's no longer all theoretical. If they're foundering and scared then they're easy to recruit and easily led. More foot soldiers for the regiment of irregulars. We're going to need latrine diggers too.
When the rule of law becomes moot, politics is only a few moments' worth of reflection away from the same destination.
When people arrive there, another essential resource is leadership skill, exercised by someone who knows how to make decisions for others, solidly based on having already done so in circumstances where lives are at stake. Maybe you like that, maybe you don't, but your liking is not an essential here; any dreams of democracy will have become nightmares by then.
The rule of law is the offshoot of the Constitution, and when one goes, they both go. Do not expect anyone to take the Constitution seriously then. Of all the things we lose, that is the most costly loss. We will probably be trying to reestablish it then, but first, it would pay to reflect that the Constitution also underlies all of the conditions and behaviors that got us to where we'd be at that moment.
I don't say we can do better.
I say we must do better.
So be cautious whenever making conjecture about the SHTF situation.
I live in the High Desert, about 1/2 a tank's distance from any major population center, and about 45 minute's drive from any smaller municipalities. I literally look left and up from the end of my driveway at Cochise's Stronghold, and the first lesson I take from its presence is the fact that the land just barely supported his small band of experts in the field of survival.
All of us need to recognize that when you get to the 'more desirable' locations, if you didn't bring it, you won't be having any of it. The water in the taps arrives by means of electrical pumps, not a reliable infrastructure when vast numbers of vagrants roam the vicinity and looting is their first priority. The first thing worth killing folks over will be that water.
Then, starve yourself for a week and see what that does to your ethical mindset; especially if your kids are starving alongside you.
I have already learned that the hunger goes away and the real price is in the physical wasting. It was a lesson subsequent to Cancer treatment (twice), when nothing would stay down, and hunger was only one of several 'inconveniences'. If I had died, it would have been in no small way due to malnutrition.
We can quip witty and conjecture wisely, but Ma Nature has the last laugh on all of us.
At my age, it does not make any sense whatsoever to have expectations of survival, I am already twice the life expectancy of 18th century civilized humans. ...At least...
Regardless, I can still leave a legacy to mine and theirs.
That's where I am making my contribution, and honestly folks, that's not something I'm going to lay out on any forum.
Greg
PS
Forstchen
...Not being armed is a failure to understand the nature of people when forced to survive. Being able to defend what you have is an essential article of preparedness. One that seems to escape many.
I have a good friend who is both entering Dementia, and has long been leaning Liberal. He forgets he's told stories, and that they are not only dumb, but have been countered logically many times. I don't think he's going to remain outside an institution for much longer; but being a friend, we all tolerate and cherish him. There but for God...
I will gently impress him with the last quote here, and keep it handy for repetition when he forgets it all yet again.