Re: Wind effects at 100yds?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: boudin</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">What you are doing is overlaying the effect of light as seen on Iron Sights and acting like it is effecting a scoped rifle... I have thousands of rounds in every kind of light condition and I have never see an impact change because of it.
On a 3D object light will change the angle of attack, on a 2D object like a reticle in a scope which is not being adversing effected by light as it is covered. Parallax would be a better explanation for shifts, before light would.
Mirage, been there done that got the t shirt, shooting in over 100 degrees in South Texas teaches you a thing or two about mirage and light... light is a non-issue with a scope. Irons, different animal, yes. </div></div>
Frank, this is something I have been trying to wrap my head around.
The range officer at my local spot has made mention several times of horizontal shift from the morning to the afternoon occurring due to the position of the sun in the sky. He often stands a cartridge up on the bench and says that POI will follow the direction of the shadow cast from the cartridge (left in the mornings, right in the afternoons). He also quotes the adage "lights up, sights up" fairly often.
Is this what you're talking about in saying light's effect on iron sights being improperly applied to a scope? I always thought he was suggesting that it was due to the angle of the light on the target, but now, after hearing it related to the front post of an iron sight, it makes a more sense. </div></div>
exactly ...
Lights Up, Sights Up is for Iron Sights... not scopes.
A reticle can be considered 2D as opposed to his 3D cartridge in the sun... You can't have the sun moving around the reticle changing the look. 1., it's covered by the scope tube, and 2, it's essentially flat.
This is the hold over from by gone days of Iron Sights, unless you are an Iron Sight shooter.
If what he is saying is to hold true, an Aimpoint red dot wouldn't work, it's essentially a parallax free system and where ever the dot is, if the scope is zeroed the bullet goes. When you remove the parallax from a Day Optic with a reticle, same thing... only if the user is just "focusing" the image picture and not removing the parallax will you see a shift and mistakenly then will probably say, "the image is in focus" which is not the same as removing the parallax.
3D objects in the sun will change perspective in the light, move the light change the perspective to the object... Lights Up Sights Up... take a scope and it is not the same.
The only way it will change your image is if the sun is pointing into the scope and causing you to magnify the problem 10x, 15, 20x times which will then effect your eyes... I just drape my now famous Shemagh over my head and most of my scope and sun / light problem is gone. If your getting what looks like lens flare in your scope chances are you looking into the sun... add a sunshade of use a ARD to cut the light down because your magnifying it into your eye ball, but you are not changing the perspective of the reticle.
How does ink on a piece of paper change perspective in the sun ? Especially with a magnified optic ?