Indeed. Modacam doesn’t have a specific name for the chamber but its chamber “E”.Did you get the eley chamber? I’m waiting on Randy Rachel to build a modx for me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed. Modacam doesn’t have a specific name for the chamber but its chamber “E”.Did you get the eley chamber? I’m waiting on Randy Rachel to build a modx for me.
Mid Jan.@021411, How long did Jonathan Have it? He has mine right now, and I am eagerly awaiting its return. IIRC he has had for two months now. Could be off by a few days.
Per Ray, "..we've changed the geometry on the leading edge of the affected area to drastically increase the amount of surface area that will interact with the receiver at the initial contact point." Increasing surface area in contact during the high stress bolt close distributes the force over more material, reducing the wear on the bolt during operation. It sounds like the material & state originally used for the bolt did not have issues with the peak forces experienced, but the new bolt had issues with gouging when experiencing the same forces during operation. There are lots of reasons to change materials, from cost of production to raw material sourcing, so if changing the geometry of the bolt fixes the gouging issue, that's a better change than going back to the other material for Zermatt.Those more privy than myself, please correct me.
There are reports that a material change occurred somewhere around S/N 3000.
Zermatt has said a geometry change addresses the issue. Does that mean the material change will stay? Why would a material change necessitate altered geometry? I haven’t followed as closely as I would like.
Some have gotten new bolts; among that group, some had no issues, while others still experienced galling.
Who knows?
I placed an order a couple weeks ago and was quoted 18 weeks. That’s fine with me. Quality over expediency.
I replaced 5 of them and all is good with all 5.It doesn’t appear to have completely fixed it. Some are still having issues.
I agree, why would you make a change to a solid product and secondly, if you have created a problem why would you not go back to the original? I have the non problem edition, but would not buy another until I was convinced that they have not down graded the material, And it sounds like they are trying to still use the softer metal.The whole thing was handled very poorly by the manufacturer. The cover up is always worse than the crime.
Not sure if it’s true but I heard they could no longer source the original material….I agree, why would you make a change to a solid product and secondly, if you have created a problem why would you not go back to the original? I have the non problem edition, but would not buy another until I was convinced that they have not down graded the material, And it sounds like they are trying to still use the softer metal.
Like 7 PRC and RL26. Maybe a cost savings too.Not sure if it’s true but I heard they could no longer source the original material….
Man, that sucks. May I ask if your serial number is 3000 or higher? How many rounds before you noticed lug galling/wear? How many round do you have on it now?I still have not received my replacement. My flats on the lugs are nearly gone. Ray informed me they’re still working thru issues, and have halted sending out replacements.
I’m bummed.. not sure how much longer this bolt will go before losing closed tolerances. Nonetheless, it shoots amazing, and will continue to wait for the end all solution.
Man, that sucks. May I ask if your serial number is 3000 or higher? How many rounds before you noticed lug galling/wear? How many round do you have on it now?
Thanks for the info and feedback. Glad you had documented the progression over round count.Serial #35XX
Noticed issues at 100 rounds.
Photos below as follows:
200 rounds
600 rounds
2000 rounds
(Round counts are approximate)
The flats are at they’re end…
When it cams over and the firing pin leaves the ramp, the bolt jumps back much more than as new. Maybe I got unlucky and mine is worse than others. But like I said, it shoots and cycles great…
View attachment 8658052View attachment 8658053View attachment 8658054
There are a lot of non-malicious reasons to change the material and processes used in manufacturing. If the source of the old material suddenly raised prices or stopped being an option, they may have been forced with a decision between angering people by raising prices, ending the product line, or just switching to a new material they felt confident would do the job instead. It sounds to me like the new material has no performance or safety concerns except for one place that is having accelerated wear due to higher local stresses, and Zermatt is openly working on correcting this. I agree it's unfortunate for us consumers that this happened, but do we want to contribute to a culture of zero tolerance for mistakes with companies that try to innovate with 22lr? I'm glad rimfire is getting attention and interested manufacturers, and I can deal with hiccups when I see a manufacturer trying to fix things.I agree, why would you make a change to a solid product and secondly, if you have created a problem why would you not go back to the original? I have the non problem edition, but would not buy another until I was convinced that they have not down graded the material, And it sounds like they are trying to still use the softer metal.
Thanks for the info and feedback. Glad you had documented the progression over round count.
My serial is 32xx, I have 175 rounds with no wear signs to date. Still black coating, very little wear indication. I guess I have yet to get enough cycling through. I occasionally cycle the bolt and still smooth with no wear. Lucky or just not there yet?
For most of us, a custom action, especially in 22LR, is very expensive luxury. The market is also quite small, compared to other shooting markets. When it works poorly, that has a huge negative impact on possible sales. I get the “just be patient” vibes, but once they take the $$$, it’s past a friendship situation.There are a lot of non-malicious reasons to change the material and processes used in manufacturing. If the source of the old material suddenly raised prices or stopped being an option, they may have been forced with a decision between angering people by raising prices, ending the product line, or just switching to a new material they felt confident would do the job instead. It sounds to me like the new material has no performance or safety concerns except for one place that is having accelerated wear due to higher local stresses, and Zermatt is openly working on correcting this. I agree it's unfortunate for us consumers that this happened, but do we want to contribute to a culture of zero tolerance for mistakes with companies that try to innovate with 22lr? I'm glad rimfire is getting attention and interested manufacturers, and I can deal with hiccups when I see a manufacturer trying to fix things.
The RimX for the longest was the underdog. It was Vudoo or bust. When the RimX started to get “modded” recently I noticed an increase in interest from folks who otherwise would have never given the RimX a chance. Just be glad you weren’t around when they first came out and had extractor issues. You’d probably cry. Folks need to calm the fuck down. Zermatt isn’t trying to pull a fast one on anyone or trying to hide anything. Yeah it sucks and shit takes time. I don’t work for them or even begin to know why things changed with production to begin with. Just throwing my two pesos in because I’m on the shitter trying to push out a turd.
Glad to hear that your rifles are working great. That’s little benefit to the ones who bought theirs impacted , and especially after the changes were made but Zermatt decided to suppress that info.Top is #152, and below #2737, Bartlien barrels spun up by TS Customs. #152 has 18,000+ rounds fired, finishing up that 4th case. #2737, 3000+ (the ATX Anschutz 1727F has been a distraction) Never experienced the "extractor" issue. If you close the bolt with a round ahead of the bolt, you broke the extractor and you have a problem. You have to beat the bolt down over the round.........Early on jake-leg gunsmiths were causing quite a few problems, seems they could not work to the barrel print specs. Buddy of mine is getting his TS Custom Bartlien barrel next week for action #3011 he's done some dry firing with the trigger installed no visible issues. I'm confidant Zermatt will get this sorted out.
Shot #2737 at Cavalier in Virgina last weekend, bunch of RimX rifles running hard no issues. Good Shootin! See you at the range!
View attachment 8658311View attachment 8658312
Top is #152, and below #2737, Bartlien barrels spun up by TS Customs. #152 has 18,000+ rounds fired, finishing up that 4th case. #2737, 3000+ (the ATX Anschutz 1727F has been a distraction) Never experienced the "extractor" issue. If you close the bolt with a round ahead of the bolt, you broke the extractor and you have a problem. You have to beat the bolt down over the round.........Early on jake-leg gunsmiths were causing quite a few problems, seems they could not work to the barrel print specs. Buddy of mine is getting his TS Custom Bartlien barrel next week for action #3011 he's done some dry firing with the trigger installed no visible issues. I'm confidant Zermatt will get this sorted out.
Shot #2737 at Cavalier in Virgina last weekend, bunch of RimX rifles running hard no issues. Good Shootin! See you at the range!
View attachment 8658311View attachment 8658312
There are 10's of 1,000's of bolt action rifles with 10's of 1,000's of rounds thru them that don't have bolt wear like this. So if they were forced to switched materials, why not something that everyone else uses? I have 4,000+ rounds thru my PRS centerfire, no bolt lug wear. 2,000's of rounds thru my Vudoo, no bolt wear.There are a lot of non-malicious reasons to change the material and processes used in manufacturing. If the source of the old material suddenly raised prices or stopped being an option, they may have been forced with a decision between angering people by raising prices, ending the product line, or just switching to a new material they felt confident would do the job instead. It sounds to me like the new material has no performance or safety concerns except for one place that is having accelerated wear due to higher local stresses, and Zermatt is openly working on correcting this. I agree it's unfortunate for us consumers that this happened, but do we want to contribute to a culture of zero tolerance for mistakes with companies that try to innovate with 22lr? I'm glad rimfire is getting attention and interested manufacturers, and I can deal with hiccups when I see a manufacturer trying to fix things.
Murphy Precision 8"Who makes that extended super rail?
Preesh. Ordered one earlier today to compare against the TT in my other actions while I wait on the RimX.Bix & Andy Tacsport Pro 2 stage
I have had 2 TTs, now have 4 BnA and no bolt action TTs. FWIWPreesh. Ordered one earlier today to compare against the TT in my other actions while I wait on the RimX.
I am worried I’ll be in the same boat. 6 TT Specials currently.I have had 2 TTs, now have 4 BnA and no bolt action TTs. FWIW