Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who says they are cooking them fully? If they’re under 160 it doesn’t kill it all.
Hey, fair's fair. Elon just had to write an essay about how his Spaceships would NOT be hitting Sharks..............This is smear factor news. Nothing more.
I wish Elon was working on a way to murder the bastards wholesale. And dolphins too. My last fishing trip, no one could land a fish because of the damn dolphins.Hey, fair's fair. Elon just had to write an essay about how his Spaceships would NOT be hitting Sharks..............
Shooting an AR at a target that's only 5 yards away? I bet they taught him that in the USMC.Democrat accidentally SHOOTS reporter with an AR-15 at campaign event
Wannabe Senator Lucas Kunce was firing the weapon during an appearance at a private range in Holt, Missouri when a bullet fragment struck television reporter Ryan Gamboa in the arm.www.dailymail.co.uk
Democrat accidentally SHOOTS reporter with an AR-15 at campaign event
Wannabe Senator Lucas Kunce was firing the weapon during an appearance at a private range in Holt, Missouri when a bullet fragment struck television reporter Ryan Gamboa in the arm.www.dailymail.co.uk
I beg forgiveness for sounding like a grammar nazi. Regardless of that, my pet peeve is when people use the term "shrapnel" in a haphazard manner.Shooting an AR at a target that's only 5 yards away? I bet they taught him that in the USMC.
A scoped AR for the win.
WTF is dat!Holy fuk check out that pic...
And look at the "eye relief extender" on that scope too...
........I beg forgiveness for sounding like a grammar nazi. Regardless of that, my pet peeve is when people use the term "shrapnel" in a haphazard manner.
He was shooting a rifle, not an artillery piece.
I won't get into the debate on whether the term "shell fragment" or "shrapnel" should be used with respect to modern artillery.
Ever notice when someone is being interviewed about being near a tornado or in a high wind condition that destroys buildings with debris flying everywhere?
Instead of using the term "debris" they use the term "shrapnel!"
The same goes for explosions caused by natural gas or other chemicals. Someone always has to use the term "shrapnel!"
Do these people think they are in combat or are they wanting to sensationalize their experience by using the term "shrapnel" instead of a more appropriate term? Or are they just stupid?
Rant over. Carry on.
This is exactly what that is.They need time to determine has many votes they need to "find"................
you can't despise them enough