If you want a real challenge build a 22 hornet. Its a reloaders dream you are constantly searching for load that shoots good and .10 grain increments are huge change in velocity and accuracy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know a guy running 22 saum lolI was kinda trolling because I thought no one would ever do such a thing, but I was wrong: https://loaddata.com/Cartridge/22-06-Easling-PO-Ackley-Data/6311
LOL 70gr solids over 4k fps.
I currently have a 22-250 pretty well on its last leg, I am thinking of getting a fast twist barrel ( 1-8 ) in 22-250 again, I want to shoot 69-75 gr bullets and I have everything I need except a new barrel, a winter project I believe !!!I was recently wondering what to do with a 22-250 VSSF that I bought back about '94. It's so shot out it just sits in the back of the safe waiting for a new barrel.
My question is similar, but, why do I want a .224 caliber bolt rifle other than a 223/5.56?
I use 223/5.56 for service rifle and F/TR, so I too have components. The 22-250 was the first rifle I reloaded for and I still have the dies and plenty of brass. About the only thing I can figure is a fast twist 22-250 to use up the slow powders I have on hand.
If you want a real challenge build a 22 hornet. Its a reloaders dream you are constantly searching for load that shoots good and .10 grain increments are huge change in velocity and accuracy.
I know a guy running 22 saum lol
The easy answer is the wylde chambering with its .062 freebore. Its basically the perfect 223 compromise unless youre trying to shoot the 90-95 sierras which are much better in a much longer throat.This part interests me and from what little I do know I feel like it is important to get correct for the reasons you mention.
I'm not an experienced enough builder / reloader to have dabbled in this too much but I'm assuming you are referring to "Freebore" which as I understand it is the part of the barrel the bullet passes through first when it leaves the case before it engages the rifling?
A longer throat would allow for a larger range of bullets (ie heavier / longer bullets) to be used - are there any downsides to having a longer throat? Ie is it possible to have to much throat?
In my mind the bullet is not supported / being guided by the rifling when in the throat area but I know we are only talking about a fractions of an inch of difference.
I would also imagine that with AICS pattern mags (which are quite big relative to any of the 22 cal cartridges mentioned) it would be pretty hard to exceed magazine lenght and run into issues with that?
Trigger time heavy use - vanilla 223 slinging 80 Berger VLD is hard to beat.
The Birth Of The .220 REDLINE – Coyote Stuff
coyotestuff.com
The easy answer is the wylde chambering with its .062 freebore. Its basically the perfect 223 compromise unless youre trying to shoot the 90-95 sierras which are much better in a much longer throat.
The wylde is a perfect match for that bullet weight. Get it in at least an 8 twist, I did 7 myself since it wont hurt anything, and itll be smooth sailing to 1k with it if you want.Good to know.
I have been looking at barrel options and noticed a 223 Wylde offering so that would work well.
I dont plan to shoot anything that heavy (75gr & 77gr is what I am thinking as I have a ton on hand) so it would fit nicely.
The wylde is a perfect match for that bullet weight. Get it in at least an 8 twist, I did 7 myself since it wont hurt anything, and itll be smooth sailing to 1k with it if you want.
I'd go 8 twist. I have a 20" 9 twist 5R, and it stabilizes 80 eld-m's and 80.5 Bergers out to 1K.
I would suggest going 1:7.5 or 1:7 twist. I made the mistake of going 1:10 twist on my first build for 69 gr bullets. Had a hard time finding 69-70 bullets I wanted to use and couldnt step up to 75+ grains. 1:7 twist and you can shoot anything up to 95 grain. I’m running 88-90 grain bullets now. I wouldnt want to limit myseld again on bullet selection by having too slow of a twist rate. My 2 cents….may be worthless to you. You may have a solid reason for selecting the 1:8 twist.I currently have a 22-250 pretty well on its last leg, I am thinking of getting a fast twist barrel ( 1-8 ) in 22-250 again, I want to shoot 69-75 gr bullets and I have everything I need except a new barrel, a winter project I believe !!!
Over the summer I built a 6 Sherman short tactical…6SST…109 hybrids at 3585fps…I’d have to look back but pretty sure I had 105s at 3680-3700…only ran these speeds for 50-60 rounds of each…at 175-200 rounds it started blowing bullets up.I bet it fucks shit up, including the barrel's throat.
Over the summer I built a 6 Sherman short tactical…6SST…109 hybrids at 3585fps…I’d have to look back but pretty sure I had 105s at 3680-3700…only ran these speeds for 50-60 rounds of each…at 175-200 rounds it started blowing bullets up.
had to dropped speeds to 3300ish and at around 358 rounds it was blowing up bullets and quit shooting…chunks missing off the lands and fire cracking 12” into the barrel…
but man was it fun!!
yeah almost 60g of powder through a 6mm hole equates to VERY short barrel life....i shot a 6creed a couple years ago with 105s at 3220....every 50-60ish rounds after the first 100 or so took another .005 off the lands at 850 rounds it quit shooting and had eroded between .050 and .060 off the lands and fire cracked 9-10" into the barrel.Wow, I was about to order a 6SST, figured I could run jacketed @ 3250 and leave solids for warp 7, but if I'm going to eat barrels in 350 rounds... f-that!
yeah almost 60g of powder through a 6mm hole equates to VERY short barrel life....i shot a 6creed a couple years ago with 105s at 3220....every 50-60ish rounds after the first 100 or so took another .005 off the lands at 850 rounds it quit shooting and had eroded between .050 and .060 off the lands and fire cracked 9-10" into the barrel.
if you want to do an SST id suggest you do a 6.5 or 7mm...if you ran a 6.5 at 3150-3200 i think you could get 1000 MAYBE 1500ish out of it and a 7mm i bet 1500+ depending on your accuracy expectations...i shot a 6.5SST around the same time as the 6...again id have to look back but im pretty sure i was running 130 hybrids at 3250 and that was on cruse control...i put over 400 rounds through that barrel before i pulled it and it would still shoot under a 1/2" at 100yds.
i love these hot rod cartridges and if i had the money id run one all the time but 4-5 barrels a year gets expensive.
I have looked and looked at the 224valk or 22 grendel several times for a bolt rifle. I have never been able to get past the fact you get almost nothing over the 223ai. Plus if you are a reloaded the 22br brings SO much more to the table....If you are going to build on a custom action, have you considered .224 valkyrie, throated to take advantage of the extra room?
I built a .22 Nosler as a fun gun, it does not feed well when you have more than 5 rounds in the mag, even the 6.8/.224/.22 nos mag I bought.
However, I get very good velocities, it was throated long so I could seat the bullets out to mag length.
80 grain bullets at 3100 is pretty easy.
The .224 would be just a bit behind, but components would be easier to source and you wouldn't have to worry about the rebated rim.
Not nearly the barrel burner as some of the other cartridges mentioned, you don't have to fireform brass like you do with the .223AI.
I'd run a 6.5 twist for the heavies.
Understood, but you wouldn't have to fireformI have looked and looked at the 224valk or 22 grendel several times for a bolt rifle. I have never been able to get past the fact you get almost nothing over the 223ai. Plus if you are a reloaded the 22br brings SO much more to the table....
Now the one exception is in the howa mini or cz527.... I think a 22 grendel with a 16.1" 1:10 barrel, built to be light would make an AMAZING coyote gun. One is on my list to build.
I never understood the fire form problem. I have done thousands of 223 to 223ai and never had any issues.Understood, but you wouldn't have to fireform
its just an extra step, wasted powder, wasted projectile, wasted primerI never understood the fire form problem. I have done thousands of 223 to 223ai and never had any issues.
its just an extra step, wasted powder, wasted projectile, wasted primer
As others have said not actually a waste per say plus you should have a 100ish rounds through just about any new barrel before you actually start load development any way as that’s about where a barrel speeds up and starts to settleits just an extra step, wasted powder, wasted projectile, wasted primer
Milspec 5.56 barrels are 1:7 and they push the 55 past 3200FPS.Anyone know if a 7 or 8 twist is too much for 55gr bullets?
I have a ton of cheap plinking 55gr bullets that I use for 3 gun and got to thinking that I may want to try them in my bolt gun at some point.
I have looked and looked at the 224valk or 22 grendel several times for a bolt rifle. I have never been able to get past the fact you get almost nothing over the 223ai. Plus if you are a reloaded the 22br brings SO much more to the table....
Now the one exception is in the howa mini or cz527.... I think a 22 grendel with a 16.1" 1:10 barrel, built to be light would make an AMAZING coyote gun. One is on my list to build.
Yep about a 100ish faster. The reason a Valk shines in an AR is.you have to shove match bullets so far into 223 for them to work in the mag. You loose alot of case cap. A bolt gun doesn't have this problem. There is a reason high power guys single feed.I haven't researched it thoroughly, but the Valkyrie did cross my mind as a build b/c brass can be found.
If the Valkyrie offers nothing or next to nothing over the 223ai, where does it fall when loading 80gr bullets compared to a regular 223? 100 fps faster? or is it close than that?
Thank you
I think there is another to consider, going in quite the other direction. The .221 Fireball. Small, very miserly with the powder and with a fast twist barrel can even shoot the heavies. No recoil, and not much noise.
We have been shooting a couple of Fireballs in XP-100’s. One is stock (since sold) and one is a full on custom. Though I must admit, it is not real happy shooting 80 grain Berger VLD’s it shoots them accurate and with enough momentum to take down 65 pound Rams at 200 meters. It loves 69 grain Sierra’s.
We use a 15 inch barrel and I suspect a 20 barrel would do nothing but enhance all of its qualities. Then add a suppressor and it would be a fun gun that would be just perfect out to 400 yards.
Been there, found that turning the necks never worked to my satisfaction and the cases I was using almost always seemed to be within spec before I turned them. However, the ease of making 300 Whisper/Blackout cases from .223, using expensive Fireball cases no longer a consideration.221 fireball is a cool case.... finding brass is fun... and making it out of 223 is even more fun!
Milspec 5.56 barrels are 1:7 and they push the 55 past 3200FPS.
I've shot them in my bolt gun but they aren't that accurate compared to a match bullet.
You’re not gonna spin bullets apart with a 223, a 7 twist works fine with them.I believe it, I know the 55gr bullets that I have are far from match but I do fancy trying to push them at the higher speeds mentioned to see what happens
If I did buy a twist that was too aggressive for them what would happen? I'm guessing they would disintegrate from the excessive RPM (I haven't ever seen that for myself but I have heard about it)?
IMR 4227 and never had a problem. If one decides to go with very heavy bullets in the Fireball, The Fireball goes super critical very quickly. The load density between not enough (to properly cause the case to expand and grab the chamber) and too much (Very sticky extraction and excessively flattened primers) was 0.3 grains.what powder for heavier bullets on the 221?
let's say a 60gr vmax and then 75gr eld?
I don't have a centerfire .22 bolt gun, just to provide some context. So my answer is worth what you paid for it.
However, as a 6BRA shooter, I'm really intrigued with the idea of a .22BRA.
You can get good velocities with the heavy for cal projectiles, which means you could easily run a ~22" barrel and still have a fairly optimal velocity. If you shoot suppressed, a 22" .22BRA would be a bit more "wieldable" then a 28" 6BRA.
I love my 6BRA - it pretty much shoots itself. It's amazing how automatic that rifle is for printing good groups. It's not picky on powder charges either, in my experience it's been very friendly to reload for. If these qualities translate over to the .22BRA, combined with optimal efficiency in a shorter barrel, I think a .22BRA would be a real killer setup.