Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeYeah, I’ve been playing around with the Berger calculator. I don’t see myself going beyond 220 grains.@fmillik
Check out berger’s stability calculator. (Screen shots below)
Even at the low velocity of 2650 it says you’re still stable. Can’t imagine you’ll have trouble hitting higher velocities than that with a 205gr and 26” barrel even with conservative loading.
I went with a 9 twist, on the recommendation of Mile High. I have not shot a pill heavier than the 230 A-Tip, which has been great. I have wondered if I should have gone with an 8.5 to work with the 250 A-Tip. Hard to argue with Dave Tooley, though.
Tbh, I no longer recall.My 9 twist shoots the 250's just fine...however....the 230's are a better bullet for the 300PRC. I soooo wanted the 250.....the BC is nice....but the 230's were just better for me in almost every way from 1 mile to 2400+ yards.
@fmillik The 9.5 twist will work for what you want. Generally it has been much easier to find a 9 twist in stock.....just curious as to why you went 9.5? But yea...it will work for what you want to do...and do it well.
Range Report/Ladder Test
Rifle: CA MPR CF 300 PRC 26" 1:8
Suppressor: SC Omega
Scope: NF NXS
Bullets: Beger 215 HT and 245 EOL
Powder: VV N565
Brass: new ADG ran through Sinclair .002 mandrel
Primer: F210M
Chrono: MagnetoSpeed V3
Location: Central TX
Temp: 97 deg F
Berger 215 HT
CBTO: 2.930" (.020 off lands)
COAL: ~3.708"
(grs) - (fps)
77.0 - 2907
77.2 - 2920
77.4 - 2913
77.6 - Bad reading, adjusted V3
77.8 - 2956
78.0 - 2949
78.2 - 2962
78.4 - 2954
78.6 - 2979
78.8 - 2996
79.0 - 2979
79.2 - 3007
79.4 - 2996
79.6 - 3020
79.8 - 3038
80.0 - 3033
80.2 - 3038
80.4 - 3032
80.6 - 3035
80.8 - 3044
81.0 - 3065 (little harder on bolt lift, no ejector marks)
81.2 - 3095
81.4 - 3082
81.6 - 3080
81.8 - 3082
82.0 - 3103 (hard bolt lift and strong ejector marks)
4rds of 80.2: Avg=3049 SD=6.9 ES=16
Berger 245 EOL
CBTO: 2.903" (.070 off lands)
COAL: ~3.738" (longest mag would allow)
73.8 - 2751
74.0 - 2727
74.2 - 2741
74.4 - 2745
74.6 - 2753
74.8 - 2751
75.0 - 2765
75.2 - 2773
75.4 - 2787
75.6 - 2787
75.8 - 2795
76.0 - 2807
76.2 - 2829
76.4 - 2809
76.6 - 2820 (hard bolt lift and ejector marks)
I also loaded four rounds of the 215 at 80.2 just for the hell of it, see attached pic for 3 shot group at 500yds.
Seems like my nodes are around 78.0-78.2 and 80.0-80.4 for the 215. And 74.7 and 75.5 for the 245.
Going to load up 5 of each in those ranges and then mess with seating depth on the 215.
What is the mandrel size that you found works best on the ADG Brass?
What is the mandrel size that you found works best on the ADG Brass?
I did mean a shouldered prefit. I should have been a little more specific in my post.Since you are comparing prefit to shouldered I’m assuming you mean a threaded pre fit (I.e savage, remage) with a barrel nut.
Advantages of the barrel nut style is they are typically cheaper and they can be prefit for any action that accepts the specified thread pattern. Disadvantage they use a barrel nut and every time you change you’ll need to set your headspace.
Advantages of shouldered (prefit or not) is that it’s made specifically for your action you just torque it on and go.
Some actions, the archimedes included, are manufactured to such tight tolerance that you can purchase a shouldered prefit. Meaning the gunsmith will not need your action in hand to make a shouldered barrel for you.
A shouldered profit from a good smith is going to be fine. There will be no detectable difference in performance.I did mean a shouldered prefit. I should have been a little more specific in my post.
Thank you for responding.
The 300PRC is going to be my first build and I want to make sure I get it right.
I was shooting at 600y today at Quantico. This Dave Tooley 27" Bartlein barrel has sped up right at 100rds. The berger 220s over IMR7977 were clocking 2810 initially and are now at 2840.
I also shot some of the 212 ELD-X Hunters today - not bad - 2905fps and grouped well, even in gusting winds. Top shot is cold bore, then four more. The amount of energy this round has is telling, my 2/3rds IPSC was flapping in the wind with each hit.
@Defender3
How is your testing with this combo going? I have about 10 lbs of 7977 and wasn't sure it would give me the velocity I was looking for with 215/220 hybrids out of my 24" but it seems like you're getting some decent speeds.
FYI: just got an email from ADG that 300 PRC brass has been shipped to dealers.
Has anyone tried the Berger 245 EOL bullets? I have an 8 twist Proof CF that I plan on developing a load for. Going to use Hornady brass until I can get my hands on Lapua brass next year. Apologies if this has been mentioned before.
How fast are you pushing them? Length of barrel?
Just curious what powder and velocity you are getting etc. I just ordered up a Forster FL die today. I feel like a fat kid in a candy store..just can’t wait lol
@BCX @Surly
I’m using 90.6 grains of reloder 50 and getting 2750 out of a 20” barrel.
I pushed it as high as ~92gr and ~2900 but got pretty good pressure signs and backed off. Haven’t tried any other powders yet as most have been hard to get. When I called Berger if memory serves their best estimated velocity was RL50 and N570.
I picked up 2lbs of N565. I plan on starting with that and see how it goes...@BCX @Surly
I’m using 90.6 grains of reloder 50 and getting 2750 out of a 20” barrel.
I pushed it as high as ~92gr and ~2900 but got pretty good pressure signs and backed off. Haven’t tried any other powders yet as most have been hard to get. When I called Berger if memory serves their best estimated velocity was RL50 and N570.
This is the label on N565. I live in the far North so not sure as of yet.How is the temp stability of that powder? One of the few left in the shelves.
I picked up 2lbs of N565. I plan on starting with that and see how it goes...
I’ve got 4 or 5 lbs of RL 26 and currently nothing to use it with.
My problem is not currently bullet or powder but 300 prc brass being unobtainium.
I got 200 pieces of beautiful 300PRC brass you can have....with slight primer pocket issues...you can just glue those buggers in if you need them to stay.
but yea.... ADG still keeps underestimating the demand for 300PRC brass...I keep telling them...they keep ignoring....
My Lapua brass will be here....hopefully before the Easter Bunny starts leaving eggs in my yard.
Been brainstorming on a fix for loose primer pockets. Some kind of swager or press.
That’s interesting. I backordered it in November but I didn’t receive any indication that they have shipped it.FYI: just got an email from ADG that 300 PRC brass has been shipped to dealers.
Haha. I stumbled across it 6 months ago. I’m guessing it works well with the 300 prc...And where did you find this N565?...I thought I had bought ALL of it
Still got enough RL-26 to get me through the 2021 competition season.
Still got 2lbs of Retumbo if anyone wants to trade me a house or a truck for it...heh
That’s interesting. I backordered it in November but I didn’t receive any indication that they have shipped it.
It probably depends on what the endgame is for either rifle. I just bought a 300WM after watching numerous videos of Mark and Sam in Australia doing many comparisons between the 300WM and 300 PRC. He has found consistently that the WM rose above the PRC once he went above 220g bullets. The PRC seemed to shine better with bullets below 220g than the WM. For my needs in ELR, I chose the WM over the PRC for that reason and for the fact that you can't get ammo for the PRC and the WM is very easy to get ammo components for. But that's just my logic, if you can't get ammo, why buy the rifle?Im in the process of getting a 300PRC barrel for my archimedes action. My question is.
Am I better off getting a pre-fit or having a blank chambered?
I should have a proof ss 30 cal blank next month that I was going to get chambered for my 300WM. It will be replacing my bartlein. I was looking at getting a pre-fit bartlein chambered in 300PRC from StraightJacket Armory. I am undecided right now.
What are the pros and cons of pre-fit barrels?
It probably depends on what the endgame is for either rifle. I just bought a 300WM after watching numerous videos of Mark and Sam in Australia doing many comparisons between the 300WM and 300 PRC. He has found consistently that the WM rose above the PRC once he went above 220g bullets. The PRC seemed to shine better with bullets below 220g than the WM. For my needs in ELR, I chose the WM over the PRC for that reason and for the fact that you can't get ammo for the PRC and the WM is very easy to get ammo components for. But that's just my logic, if you can't get ammo, why buy the rifle?
wutIt probably depends on what the endgame is for either rifle. I just bought a 300WM after watching numerous videos of Mark and Sam in Australia doing many comparisons between the 300WM and 300 PRC. He has found consistently that the WM rose above the PRC once he went above 220g bullets. The PRC seemed to shine better with bullets below 220g than the WM. For my needs in ELR, I chose the WM over the PRC for that reason and for the fact that you can't get ammo for the PRC and the WM is very easy to get ammo components for. But that's just my logic, if you can't get ammo, why buy the rifle?
I am definitely going to keep my win mag. I love it and with my chamber am able to achieve higher speeds using 220gr and heavier bullets. Im pushing 220gr scenars close to 2900fps and couldn't be happier with the results downrange. I am going to run them (300WM & 300PRC) side by side and see which one does better across different bullet weights. The load testing and reloading process is very interesting and I enjoy it thoroughly. I am hoping that the current situation with reloading components settles down so that we can continue enjoying the sport.It probably depends on what the endgame is for either rifle. I just bought a 300WM after watching numerous videos of Mark and Sam in Australia doing many comparisons between the 300WM and 300 PRC. He has found consistently that the WM rose above the PRC once he went above 220g bullets. The PRC seemed to shine better with bullets below 220g than the WM. For my needs in ELR, I chose the WM over the PRC for that reason and for the fact that you can't get ammo for the PRC and the WM is very easy to get ammo components for. But that's just my logic, if you can't get ammo, why buy the rifle?
even a non saami winmag within CIP lengthsWhat b2lee said.
The only way to get a 300wm to perform equally is with a custom reamer and single feeding your rounds.
And then it will still need to make up for the more efficient case design and 5% increase in volume the 300 prc has over the 300wm.
I like 300 win mag, I own 300 win mags, but the 300 prc is a more advanced modern version and I can’t see where a saami 300wm will ever outperform a 300 prc.
Watch his videos comparing them. He's done the research, probably more than anyone on the planet so far. He's probably fired and tested many hundreds of rounds before he even makes each of his videos. And what you see is an unbiased testing of barrel lengths, bullet weights, etc... By trade he is an automotive engineer and a smart sumbitch. So he knows how to test and retest without skewing data or results.wut
WM does better with 220 and above by comparison?
cliff notesWatch his videos comparing them. He's done the research, probably more than anyone on the planet so far. He's probably fired and tested many hundreds of rounds before he even makes each of his videos. And what you see is an unbiased testing of barrel lengths, bullet weights, etc... By trade he is an automotive engineer and a smart sumbitch. So he knows how to test and retest without skewing data or results.
I already am reloading for my Win Mag with 208g Bergers and the COAL is over .300" longer than SAAMI specs. But the performance projectiles in those grain weights are so much longer than normal projectiles you could never make them to be SAAMI spec because they would be so far inside the case you couldn't put any powder in them. That's one reason the chambers are so deep in the barrels because they realized performance projectiles needed different seating depths than factory projectiles.