Re: 300gr VLD Hybrid@ 1700M
I agree Mouse that QTU should be more accurate. And like I said, I need to drill down on this more. So far, and this is very limited data set, for shooting out at 1600 yards, Shooter was very close with about 5 steps of G7 BCs. And Lapua QTU seemed like it was about 1MOA off from where Shooter predicted. But I am having a hard time getting all the atmospheric data sorted out, because unlike Shooter, QTU will not allow rifle zero conditions to be different than current shooting conditions. This really sucks, because it means you have to effectively zero the rifle again during each shooting session. So struggling to get apple to apple comparisons could cause QTU and Shooter not to agree.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mouse07410</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cali_tz</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
On the Lapua QTU app, there is a complete (almost continuous) drag function covering below, above and transonic speeds, and it doesn't seem noticeably more accurate... Shooter and QTU seem to agree pretty closely. I need to spend more time sifting thru apple to apple comparisons to see. But presumably the Lapua QTU should provide best possible data for Lapua bullets, given they supply these radar measured drag curves.</div></div>
To me hearing that Lapua QTU isn't noticeably more accurate despite using direct drag data obtained from radar measurements is very shocking, to say the least. </div></div>