Back out again with Varget and 77gr SMKs. They ran a touch slower, liked max mag length the best which is easy. Getting some crunch with 24 grs, noticed seating depth was a little less consistent because of that, May bump back to 23.8-9. Would probably put me right around 2700 fps.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
5.56 AR Only Loads
- Thread starter padom
- Start date
I have found for my WOA barrels at least that 23.8 of Varget under a 77SMK seems to be the magic load, that extra .02 shouldnt make much of a difference but it pushes my SDs higher and my accuracy a touch lower for some reason despite all the service rifle people insisting that I just load 24.0 at mag length and forget it.
Service rifle scores are way more you reading the wind and technique, a more accurate load does help but I think it was just me having more experience too
Right now I've got a bunch of 69gr RMR bullets loaded up with TAC from 23-25gr just waiting for a not windy, not shitty day to test them
When I used to shoot NRA High Power matches, I shot 23.6 gr of Varget under 77 gr SMK loaded at mag length out of my 20" WOA upper.
It is a heavy barrel with an unthreaded muzzle.
Yeah, it's an A2 upper. It has their fine adjust iron sights. I can't remember offhand if it's 1/2 or 1/4 moa adjustments. It's pushing a decade that it's been sitting in the safe.
I actually just loaded a ladder of 69’s in LC brass to test tomorrow with Tac, 24-25 grains at .02 increments- no compression. Sierra manual has max below that bit out of a 20” barrel - I’m guessing 24.6-25 will find the sweet spot out of a 16” - hopefully at least
Man, I'm not seeing it at mag length. What am I missing?He can probably still shake those rounds like a maraca with 24.5 gn of TAC in there
That Ramshot TAC is a ball powder, and doesn't take up nearly as much room grain for grain of weight as Varget?
I am loading 223 right now. I'm going to switch Varget out of my autotrickler to TAC just to verify.That TAC is a ball powder, and doesn't take up nearly as much room grain for grain of weight as Varget?
Hopefully it's an AT4, not an earlier version. The Lee PPM doesn't like ball powder of any flavor. DAMHIKT
My white oak barrel is the same way. Anything over 24.2 with 73-77gr it looks like a shotgun blast even though the brass isn’t smearing with LC. Luckily 24.0 is when I get 2700-2720 with 16 inch barrel. With the 73gr 24.2 gets me 2750. I’m using CCI 450’s with tac in LC brass and a 2.250 seating depth
No idea if I get a bug up my ass I'll chrono them most of the time I'm shooting steel and bowling pins out in the desert anyways
I just want to get this rifle shooting at least one good load so far the only other OK one was 3/4-1MOA
These were FC brass weight is about 93gr the bullets are 69gr RMRs 2.250" I bought a ton of when they were 10cents each
Also they shake fine, not compressed, brass looks fine
So plenty of room for a fine ball powder to flow up around the boat tail as the bullet goes into the case, rather than squish/compress like with a stick powder
Sounds like a theory that doesn't pan out in practice based on the posts in this thread. I loaded 24.8gr in LC brass with 77's at 2.255" (based on some of the posts in this thread) and shot them in a bolt action rifle. Velocities were around 3030fps, SD and ES was all over the place and accuracy sucked. I was trying to duplicate my normal accuracy load of 23.5gr 8208 in mag length 77. Based on what I read in this thread 24.8 sounded about right. It definitely wasn't. I would say if I wanted to match the 2930fps 8208 load and not compress powder too bad I need to shoot 23.5, max 24. And then based on what we can all see by the photos I posted, it makes sense.So plenty of room for a fine ball powder to flow up around the boat tail as the bullet goes into the case, rather than squish/compress like with a stick powder
Not sure what you think you're seeing from those pics. All I said is that he had *room*, and probably not compressed. And I still say that, looking at the pics you posted. Whether that charge is a good idea based on the *burn rate* is a different matter. Personally, I'd say 24.5 of TAC behind a 77 is a little too spicy for me - but then I did most of my learning with the S77MK behind a 20" AR Service Rifle barrel. Some of the loads that bolt-gunners use today would have blown the primers clean out of the cases in an AR back then.
Kind of making my point. 24.5gr is too much. So I don't know why you would have previously stated it wasn't. As far as the photos, how can you not see the bullet clearly extends lower than the powder fill line? Pretty obvious to me....
My original point was that there likely still room in the case, whether the load was too hot or not was not something I ever addressed. The two are not necessarily linked. The old .260 Rem was a good example - you could load those to where the primer would come clean out of the pocket, and still have *grains* of volume left.
And as for what the pics show... I 'see' that the base of the boat tail would indeed extend down to below the powder fill line. And I can 'visualize' that said boat tail would displace some of that powder off to the sides, along the slope of the shoulder.
For further evidence, he (BCP, not me) says:
And as for what the pics show... I 'see' that the base of the boat tail would indeed extend down to below the powder fill line. And I can 'visualize' that said boat tail would displace some of that powder off to the sides, along the slope of the shoulder.
For further evidence, he (BCP, not me) says:
Ya but there really isn't enough room for all that flow based on how deep the bullet extends. At this point you're trying to argue margins. Clearly the bullet extends deeper that the powder fill line. We can all agree on that. And we can all agree that 24.5 is too hot. And we can all see people reporting that above 24 they get shit results.
So what are we trying to argue about?
Yeah they go to 24.8 with a winchester case, I'm not really sure what this other guy is going on about tbh
So I chased my tail on the 69g smk and your targets are looking like my first attempts.
You didn't mention your coal or cbto on that load. If you run them at mag lenght you are probably in the lands .
My ar's don't like that.
I think using a set of heavy bags on a bench, getting a good squared up position and adjusting your point of aim at rest will improve your shooting over results with a sled.
There is not a lot of recol and the sled is a pita to drag around.
Last edited:
When I started picking up components for reloading and before I got more experienced, I bought a ton of both 69 SMKs and 77 SMKs, thinking that I would load three loads for each of my gas guns based on distance (55,69 and 77), I also thought that 69's would be an easy load like the 77's...............
My experience though has been that the 69 SMK is a harder tip to load then the 77 for whatever reason, some of my gas guns just wont shoot it well no matter what I have tried, some will shoot it moderately well but no where near what I expected or want.
I have never tried the 69 RMR bullet or any other 69's to be honest, I am trying to shoot the ones I have left and I will never buy more, will stick with the 77 SMK.
Try 24.5- 25.0 Gr. N540 VV powder ,with either 69 Gr. or 77 Gr. pills and see what results You obtain .
I use NATO cases LC Norma and Lapua , you should get very favorable groups ,at least MOA or something is amiss , that barrel is severely fouled or not capable ?. I was using one of my 5.56X45 , a unencumbered PSA 20" ,so Not one of My Aero Precision platforms which I prefer . Powder evaluation to see what everybody likes .
The 6.5CM target shows differences of powder choices a little better . I generally shoot off a Bag or sand bags and use a dime to cover a group of shots . IF the dime covers #5 or more I'm happy .
Paper plate was done 29 years ago off the ground at a Sheriff's Dept. exhibition shoot ,where I demonstrated the proficiency of handloading out of a bone stock XM15 A2 20" Bushmaster . Winchester bulk 55 gr. bullets 25.5 BlC-2 powder . Vertical string Winchester white box crap . Got #15 under the dime at 200 Yd. using a Nikon Monarch 3 ,3X12X42 scope . Still have that setup and is one of the most accurate 5.56X45mm units I've ever owned . Go figure chrome lined bore no less
Attachments
Out with the 16" Ballistic Advantage stainless SPR
62gr Hornady FMJ w/ cannelure
Tac
Fed brass
CCI 41s
Shot with a 4x lpvo 2 moa center dot so happy with the bullet so far at 101y.
62gr Hornady FMJ w/ cannelure
Tac
Fed brass
CCI 41s
Shot with a 4x lpvo 2 moa center dot so happy with the bullet so far at 101y.
Attachments
Try 24.5gr TAC with the lighter bullets 55-62 someone suggested it to me and it shot well out of all my rifles with 55vmax and 62gr cannelure bullets (COAL = wherever cannelure was)
Lorenzo, those velocities are fast for a 16" barrel. Nay have to give TAC a try with Hornady 62g El VTs.
Brass looked good, primers were just barely starting to flatten at the top end. Based on the feel of the primer pockets of the Fed brass I am using, I could see 3-4 firings on it at least.
Just keep in mind your loading in the winter with a powder that's got a little bit of temp sensitivity to it
I have indeed which is why I am not settling on the higher ones. I just wanted to get a feel for the powder and find where the pressure starts.
Another trip out with the 16" ballistic advantage stainless SPR barrel, 1/8 midlength gas.
Gusty L-R 8 - 15 mph
4x optic with 2 moa center dot
101y 53 degrees F
Orange dots are 3"
Gonna play with seating depth on the 62 fmj on a calmer day, seems to shoot about the same no matter the powder charge. Could be the 4x optic with 2 moa dot too. Not the best for precision.
Gusty L-R 8 - 15 mph
4x optic with 2 moa center dot
101y 53 degrees F
Orange dots are 3"
Gonna play with seating depth on the 62 fmj on a calmer day, seems to shoot about the same no matter the powder charge. Could be the 4x optic with 2 moa dot too. Not the best for precision.
Attachments
Dot's suck for precision shot placement ,IMO . I've never liked them as they obscure the aim point . I prefer MilRad and nearer this type of reticle . It's far superior for grouping shots, rather than dots .
Agreed, this particular rifle has just had a cheap 1x4 on it as a place holder for awhile, I can actually get it done decently on steel but it's time for an upgrade to a 1x6 or 1x8 with a better reticle.
Brother do your self a super huge favor , Grab a 3-15X44 Vortex Venom FFP at a ridiculous cost . Sport Optics on sale with additional 13% off a $650.00 scope for a tad over $400.00 bucks . I normally pop either older Nikon's or New Meopta scopes on MY rigs .
Being mid 70's now eyes aren't what they once were ,so I need all the help I can muster . Thankfully I've still got an iron rock steady grip but eyeballs are shady . Didn't wear any specs other than shades all my life , until I was like early to mid 60's .
So NOT complaining just facing reality . Next year I'll have to wear glasses to get MY DL ,first time ever
