I'm going to feed the troll.
@Mastet blaster
Antifa/BLM came to my town, they behaved well. In the city adjacent to my town, Antifa/BLM burned down a police station and caused millions of dollars in damage.
My town and this city border each other, what's the difference? Many lawful people showed up with guns in my town. My town had the support of conservative Mayor, a police force that worked as peace officers and not law enforcement, even the blue but gun loving Sheriff showed up with his deputies and he told me that he would tolerate no monkey business on either side.
You have a right to voice your opinion and to have any opinion that you please, however repugnant it may be to others. You don't have a right to destroy things that aren't yours or worse.
Ad-hominem attacks don't bolster your position.
The Reinhold element is irrelevant for this discussion. We are discussing Kyle Rittenhouse. Whatever happened with Reinhold is it's own discussion. Co-mingling of these two is a red herring/tu quoque.
If you try to take someone's firearm through coercion, you are forfeiting your life. If KR was going rambo, there would've been many other opportunities to do so.
If you and many others are chasing someone who is running with a firearm and they get impeded in their retreat, they are likely to use it against you. Given the number of people attacking KR, I would feel in danger of my life or great bodily harm.
After the first shooting, the people who attacked KR could've believed they were doing the right thing. They were attempting to stop a legitimate threat. I'm not an attorney so I don't know what the implications are if that is what is determined to have happened.
He is presumed innocent by law until he is/is not found guilty by a jury of his peers. It is the prosecutions job to make their case and to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury of KR's peers. There may be many facts and evidence that we do not have access to.