Yes and No. Not a doctor but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night
My understanding is with the vax, the issue is they're introducing the spike by itself as the "hey look at me" target for your immune system, or so the theory goes, by itself without the actual 'virus'
The problem is, the spike is causing the same symptoms as the virus. The assumption was the spike wasn't in and of itself toxic, it was just a method of attachment for the real toxic material in the virus.
I believe the actual wuflu your immune system recognizes the foreign invaders and will respond and attack appropriately. It's not able to pass the blood/brain barrier and it's killed off as a singular unit.
The issue with the vax is these spikes are floating around by themselves, in the bloodstream, they are passing the blood/brain barrier, not unlike cancer cells in that they're basically floating system wide and landing everywhere.
Where they land they start causing inflammation and reactions to it and depending on your age and health and how your body is able to cope with the inflammatory response in that organ/area you may or may not have a major fucking problem.
The fuckup was in the assumption that the spike was benign by itself, it's not. It causes the same symptoms as the disease so you're essentially injecting live virus.
If you've never had it, your body appears better able to cope. If you've had it and recovered, then get bombarded again, people don't seem to be doing so well in some cases the second time around.
That's what I've gleaned from the docs brave enough to go against the grain and say hey this is fucky we shouldn't be doing it, here's why.