PortaJohn

Europeans were here 20,000 years ago, long before they were. But you probably don’t know about that.

You could debate about what kind of humaniod or other branches of human type creatures might have been on this continent 20,000 years ago.
But to describe them as "Europeans" in the same way "Europeans" have been thought of for the past 2000 years + is probably not accurate.

Any tribes of human type beings that were around 20,000 years ago would have been very far removed from our current ideas of races/cultures/nationalities. They may not have genetically been the same kind of modern humans that are predominant today.

You are trying to argue as fact and claim superior knowledge about things that are very much up for debate / research and not clearly settled in any manner.
 
reminder

2QAiHYZWdwkN.png
 
Gabbard is part of the problem. She's a democrat, isn't she?
The difference is that Gabbard seems to be an honest democrat, with libertarian leanings. I have less issue with someone who believes different than I do, when they are honest. It's the lying, stealing and manipulating that makes me want to explode.
 
The difference is that Gabbard seems to be an honest democrat, with libertarian leanings. I have less issue with someone who believes different than I do, when they are honest. It's the lying, stealing and manipulating that makes me want to explode.

That may have been true at one time when there were a lot of different people with different views in the democratic party. The party is so monolithic in thought now, that they ought to be good at goose-stepping down Pennsylvania Avenue if they were to ever gain complete control over the US. They are very close to that goal now.

Saying that Tulsi Gabbard is a "good democrat" is like saying there were "good Nazis" running the concentration camps. She's good looking, articulate and says just the right things to sound like a conservative but, make no mistake, it's a very well played ruse to get votes when the time comes. That's an MO that all democrats follow.
 
Wow this a.m.! Four low level F-16's flew over my house in north central Oklahoma this morning. When I was a kid we had a regular training route that was fun to watch. They were always F4's. That was many moons ago. Have not seen an actual fighter in years in these parts. Trainers out of Vance AFB all of the time, but not F16's. Probably means nothing, but to give some perspective, the last F4 I saw was during dessert storm during increased activity.
They are amazing to watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theLBC
This is really good... just drags that fucking cunt Hillary through it...

More about the pathetic Zelenskly bullshit speech... this guy just cuts through the illusions.

They're leading us to WWIII b/c the system is collapsing and they want the ultimate distraction... while the elite will take the cash and escape on their yachts

 



1647532112491.png



 
That may have been true at one time when there were a lot of different people with different views in the democratic party. The party is so monolithic in thought now, that they ought to be good at goose-stepping down Pennsylvania Avenue if they were to ever gain complete control over the US. They are very close to that goal now.

Saying that Tulsi Gabbard is a "good democrat" is like saying there were "good Nazis" running the concentration camps. She's good looking, articulate and says just the right things to sound like a conservative but, make no mistake, it's a very well played ruse to get votes when the time comes. That's an MO that all democrats follow.
I didn't say she was a good democrat. I said she seems to be an "honest democrat."
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigamortis
after all she has been through....you'll have to kill her to shut her up. that woman is unbreakable.
Any time I've seen her report on anything, she's always been well read, informed, direct, and factual. Also, she puts it out in a language the common person can understand.
Plus...she's HOT!! Mac
 
  • Like
Reactions: TACC and devildog93
Spike Protein Gets In The Blood of Vaccinated Individuals (Firm Data From A Stanford Study) Pfizer-BionTech vaccinated individuals showed a level of spike protein in the blood that was similar to the amount of spike protein in the blood of an acute COVID patient. This level stayed high for 2 days in 96% of the individuals.

 
It's the difference between dying in a blast or from rapid onset radiation poisoning and being contaminated (hence the term 'dirty bomb') and slowly suffering the effects, bringing it home and hugging your wife and kids, petting your dog, spreading it all over the place without really realizing it

It's invisible remember, so think Boston Bombing. If you weren't maimed or seriously injured you would just go home never the wiser. Except surprise it was stuffed full of radiological waste material and everyone within a certain radius was contaminated.

It's not unlike what happened with the Novachak shit in England that the ruskies used on the defector. Nerve agent that's got no odor, taste, smell, nada. Spread it around like an invisible cancer until you find where it started and start contact tracing everyone and everything that was there and where it went and who and what it touched when it left.

That's why they're such a nightmare. No nuclear physics degree needed.
What you say is correct but the degree of contamination is very dependent on the material you have to work with and how it is propelled via the detonation. It is not as easy to cause any significant contamination using commonly available radioactive waste like from a hospital.

Not saying a "dirty bomb" can't kill people but the number that would die from acute radiation poisoning like a normal nuclear explosive would provide would be small. Most of the instantaneous or near instantaneous radiation poisoning that occurs in a nuclear detonation is caused by neutron or X-ray radiation produced by the process. That exposure kills you fairly quickly in a gruesome manner. Radiation via fallout itself causes more long term issues...cancers developed over time so you die later via more or less conventional cancers.
 
What you say is correct but the degree of contamination is very dependent on the material you have to work with and how it is propelled via the detonation. It is not as easy to cause any significant contamination using commonly available radioactive waste like from a hospital.

Not saying a "dirty bomb" can't kill people but the number that would die from acute radiation poisoning like a normal nuclear explosive would provide would be small. Most of the instantaneous or near instantaneous radiation poisoning that occurs in a nuclear detonation is caused by neutron or X-ray radiation produced by the process. That exposure kills you fairly quickly in a gruesome manner. Radiation via fallout itself causes more long term issues...cancers developed over time so you die later via more or less conventional cancers.
Like ya said, depends what they use. I sure wouldn't want to be sitting in some Fema tent waiting to find out while the feebs investigated.

The fear and panic it would cause alone would be FML for first responders in the area, hospitals, emergency response, etc. Every asshole with a rash would show up thinking he was exposed and you'd have to treat him as such till proven otherwise.

This was part of my point, perhaps not worded well, it's not that it does much damage, it's that you have to treat it that way even though it hasn't and what that means in terms of resources.

Regardless of what they use, I wouldn't want the shit on me before I headed home, ya know?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10ring'r and Nik H
Man.,... you know. I'm liking Putin.... He's DONE DONE DONE

He's telling the West "We're Out. We're finally out. West will not control us anymore. Done with the Globalist corruption for us.

Call me anti-American -- :LOL: I'm anti-deepstate. I'm anti-lies and deception and misinformation that's coming FROM OUR OWN WAR MONGERING CORRUPT GOVERNMENT Amazing and sad... when Russian values are aligning closer to what ours once were.