PortaJohn

#122,251
Mwalex said:
Click to expand...

While the Constitution doesn't explicitly say that the Executive has immunity from prosecution, it never fucking needed to, because in 200+ years no executive has ever weaponized the Judicial Branch against political opponents and policies they don't like. Even as Potato opened our borders and refuses to follow the law no one is trying to use the Judicial to attack him.

Honestly, I was not sure how this bout with communist lawfare would play out. I figured it would be a tit for tat tell we devolved into violence and commenced to killing each other. A strong and decisive ruling like this may very well end it, but I did not think the SCOTUS, being as already politicized with three partisan hacks on it would rule reasonably and follow the intent of The Constitution. No surprise that the three brain dead women have zero legal arguements and make brazen political statements in the desent.

They may have actually saved us from further becoming a banana republic this whole thing ending in civil war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn, goinghunting, 91Eunozs and 4 others
#122,252
Mwalex said:
Click to expand...


"he was grappling for numbers, grappling for platform positions, rather than reacting to the question directly from his own personal feelings, personal experiences.”

Here it is again. They are very open and proud of their feelings over facts. So much so that they are angry if anyone holds them accountable to facts.

Remember this one,
"we choose truth over facts!"
--Pedo Pete



"Our reverence for the truth might be a distraction that is getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done. That is not to say that the truth doesn't exist or to say that the truth isn't important. Clearly the search for the truth has led us to do great things... [but] one reason we have such glorious chronicles to the human experience and all forms of culture is because we acknowledge there are many different truths."

"I'm certain that the truth exists for you. And probably for the person sitting next to you. But this may not be the same truth,"

--Katherine Maher, Wikipedia and now NPR CEO at a Ted talk explaining why lying to the public is necessary to accomplish communist goals
:ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: goinghunting and Mwalex
#122,254
pjmedia.com

Illegal Alien Crime Wave Sweeps America

pjmedia.com pjmedia.com

The numbers are staggering. “In fiscal year 2023, [ICE’s] ERO arrested 73,822 noncitizens with criminal histories; this group had 290,178 associated charges and convictions with an average of four per individual,” U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) stated in February. “These included 33,209 assaults; 4,390 sex and sexual assaults; 7,520 weapons offenses; 1,713 charges or convictions for homicide; and 1,655 kidnapping offenses.” Two points from this are particularly striking. Firstly, the sheer numbers. Think of how many people were victimized by criminals who should never have been in America to begin with. Secondly, notice that the average number of crimes per illegal alien was four. These are bestial, evil individuals who are fully dedicated to a life of crime, and who were allowed into the country by woke Democrats.
Click to expand...
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46, Mwalex and Fig
#122,255
03790a7dfe875698cbd678d3db26cd18.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: notacos4u, armorpl8chikn, 91Eunozs and 3 others
#122,259
theLBC said:
Click to expand...

Supreme Court Punts On Florida & Texas Social Media Laws, Sends Cases Back To Lower Courts | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com

"
This was the first time the nation’s highest court had reviewed state laws that deem social media companies “common carriers,” a status that might allow states to impose utility-style regulations on platforms and forbid them from discriminating against users based on their political viewpoints.

Observers and activists on the left and right had been closely watching the cases.

At stake was the right of individual Americans to freely express themselves online and the right of social media platforms to make editorial decisions about the content they host. These competing rights are both protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Republicans and conservatives were outraged when platforms acted in concert to ban President Donald Trump in January 2021, blocked a potentially election-altering New York Post article about Hunter Biden’s laptop in 2020, and silenced dissenting opinions about the origins of the COVID-19 virus, the treatments for the disease it causes, and the vaccines. They say that social media platforms have become the new town square and that users’ speech, therefore, enjoys constitutional protection.

Democrats and liberals, on the other hand, claim that the platforms don’t do enough to weed out so-called hate speech and alleged misinformation, which they consider to be pressing social problems."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mwalex
#122,269
#122,273
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: armorpl8chikn, Mwalex and 91Eunozs
#122,275
UKDslayer said:
www.thegatewaypundit.com

Las Vegas Police Host Mass Shooting Preparedness Training for Churches | The Gateway Pundit | by Anthony Scott

The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Black Police Association conducted active shooter preparedness training in several churches and other places of worship in the Las Vegas area.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
Click to expand...

Sad, but necessary.

My son and most of his friends are armed ‘security’ for their respective churches; not required with Constitutional Carry here in TX, but all have their concealed carry licenses. Most of them served in the military (for whatever that’s worth), and all train…well, religiously! LoL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Camelfilter, 6.5SH and UKDslayer
#122,277
91Eunozs said:
Sad, but necessary.

My son and most of his friends are armed ‘security’ for their respective churches; not required with Constitutional Carry here in TX, but all have their concealed carry licenses. Most of them served in the military (for whatever that’s worth), and all train…well, religiously! LoL
Click to expand...

Sutherland Spring/Southern Baptist was a real wake-up call. I know all the big churches around here have their designated "security force" plus who knows how many other worshippers are carrying at any given time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Eunozs
#122,284
91Eunozs said:
Sad, but necessary.

My son and most of his friends are armed ‘security’ for their respective churches; not required with Constitutional Carry here in TX, but all have their concealed carry licenses. Most of them served in the military (for whatever that’s worth), and all train…well, religiously! LoL
Click to expand...
I was asked to be on the safety team at my church. I looked at the training regimen as well as some of their rules and told them no thanks. There was a lot of it that really gave me heartburn. I suspect this is how many churches are handling their security too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Eunozs
#122,292
UN FACT: Chevron Deference was used to protect big corporations from liability for the harm they caused.The Chevron v NRDC case started because the EPA changed the law's definition of "source of air pollution" to favor Chevron and other heavily-polluting companies.So the NRDC filed a federal appeal, claiming that the EPA was illegally re-writing the law. The DC Circuit Court ruled in the NRDC's favor.Then SCOTUS ruled that the EPA were the "experts", and therefore the courts (and the nation) had to simply defer to however they interpreted the law.But wait, why would the EPA favor the very companies they're supposed to "protect" us from?Because if a regulatory agency has total control of an industry, the biggest players in that industry have a vested interest in taking over those agencies.They fill them with their cronies, first to protect themselves from being regulated out of existence. But once they're in the pilot's seat, they can do whatever they want.They can regulate their smaller competitors out of existence.They can mandate the use of their products.They can look the other way when they violate their own regulations, or just redefine the regulation at will (like they did with Chevron).They can do whatever they want.And up until last Friday, the courts were powerless to stop them.So when you hear someone screeching that the end of Chevron Deference means a return to the dark days of pre-1984 America, when corporations could put radioactive shrapnel in our milk, remind them that the exact opposite is true.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: armorpl8chikn, clcustom1911, gigamortis and 2 others
#122,298
amazing. this is why people have no use for cops. the violent enforcement of lock downs was the big wake up call. 90+% of them will do anything they are told and use whatever force they can get away with. must be chosen for having the blind obedience gene. the fat girl shooting here was an example. although in that one opinions here all have valid points.
i have been wondering why in all the shooting vids you see that they mag dump on the obviously gonna die. i know "dead" people can still cause damage knife or gun. i think maybe the potential bystander damage is ignored and is a training deficit. maybe need to leave 9mm for something else?
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn, Bullfrog08, Emerson0311 and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lowlight
Call to Action : Scout Sniper Heritage Foundation
Replies
1
Views
254
Redmanss
Redmanss
LuckyDuck
Quick question for the "watch guys" on the Hide here...
Replies
21
Views
1K
Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
K
  • Locked
Firearms Nope
Replies
1
Views
989
kriller134
K
Lowlight
Some to think about ....
Replies
55
Views
3K
UKDslayer
U
Lowlight
The Everyday Sniper Podcast: The Great Reset
Replies
0
Views
537
Lowlight
Lowlight
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts