He said $4000+ optic not $2999 (minus super secret PRS discounts).Ahh a Gen III Vortex Razor
Now this isn’t so surprising
So now let's have a look at that ZCO objective lens and let the flaming roll on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He said $4000+ optic not $2999 (minus super secret PRS discounts).Ahh a Gen III Vortex Razor
Now this isn’t so surprising
This is the next one...3rd actually and last.. the wife being in the hospital post partum with serious infection from botched epidural for 2 weeks on serious IV antibiotics, shaking, high fever and me being home by myself with a newborn and 2 teenagers isnt the easiest situations but all is good I got it. She got discharged late Friday and home with us now. Hoping it stays that way
Puts this kind of shit in perspective…. Glad she’s on the mend and congratulations.
Dang, we had a rough go a couple months ago with our 3rd too. I'll be praying for you guys today.This is the next one...3rd actually and last.. the wife being in the hospital post partum with serious infection from botched epidural for 2 weeks on serious IV antibiotics, shaking, high fever and me being home by myself with a newborn and 2 teenagers isnt the easiest situations but all is good I got it. She got discharged late Friday and home with us now. Hoping it stays that way
Screw the crack. That is a horrible reticle. Is it MOA or MIL ?
Go be poor somewhere elseMust be a shit and Bender.
Haha
More reasons to buy leupold.
American made
Indestructible
Cost 1/3 of these ones that all you people have issues with
When’s the last time you heard a Leupold break a lens? It’s because they are made in the USA. Not jap junk
Is that a thing? Have Zero Compromise Optics had comprising optics?As I said before, not the first case of this happening with that brand
They just repaired it the first time. Not replaced. Maybe an out of spec tube. If the rings were putting too much torque then I’d have turret, magnification or parealax adjustment issues.That's crazy, especially happening to two identical scopes.
I'm gonna go with the rings being overtorqued as the culprit. If it were a manufacturer defect, I'm sure we'd have heard about it by now from others. Or you are the most unlucky SOB and happened to get two defective scopes from a top tier manufacturer that failed in the exact same fashion.
Occam's Razor.
Easy Button!
Occam's Razor.
Appreciate it.
Do you have kids ? They are a gift.
you heard it right. 1 is mine, 1 is my wife...divorce and remarried deal. So technically my second but 2 teenagers in the house I take care ofBro lemme get this straight... You have 2 teenagers and now a newborn?? Bless your dear heart you were almost in the clear
BahahaYa, but where would all the dad's get to commiserate?
Glory hole at a truck stop like normal guys.Ya, but where would all the dad's get to commiserate?
Glory hole at a truck stop like normal guys.
36…I'm sure you double checked, but you don't have like a 35mm scope in 34mm rings-right?
the cat is out of the bag officially lolYessir… 36mm
Rifle Scopes - Shit Happens / Outstanding CS Comes Through
Got my ZCO sunshade in the mail when I got home from work last Thursday (April 23rd). Went to go and install it, taking my rifle out of my case, flipped open the Tenerbraex cap cover and this is what I see. What the F#CK!!! No clue what happened. Was perfectly fine when I put it away, in a...www.snipershide.com
Idk, sounded good though lolThey still have those??
Yessir… 36mm
Ditto: I've shot literally hundreds of FTR matches plus all the testing. Fun shoots, ELR etc. I've never torqued a scope ring 1X. Snug it down. Check it often before you shoot but snug is all you need. Never had a problem.I love my arc rings but for the love of god I wouldn’t torque them to anything above 35 in-lb. As long as your scope doesn’t slip, the minimum amount of torque is the best.
I don’t see how crushing the middle of the maintube would have anything to do with the ocular that spins within its own housing.
I was thinking the same thing but as I sat here and thought about it, If the tube was flexed I suppose it could also load one side of the ocular housing and that stress may transfer to the lens. I would think you’d feel it binding though. Very curious what the manufacturer finds if the mount is shipped with it.
Unless it wasn't a sacred cow brand and another brand and then the "WaRrANtY" nijas would have been posting wise ass comments.That's how this thread could have gone....
I'm not sure where you see that we don't recommend more than 25 inch pounds. The literature and Operator's Manual clearly say to use the ring manufacturer torque specs. I know, I wrote the manual.
ZCO scopes will handle the ARC torque just fine as they specify. No worries at all.
Good old post findARC rings will be just fine with a z comp. i have 2 of them and never had an issue. Here is an old post from them.
ARC rings will be just fine with a z comp. i have 2 of them and never had an issue. Here is an old post from them.
Thanks...someone just posted that on another thread and I just saw it. Makes way more sense that the alternative that was reported.ARC rings will be just fine with a z comp. i have 2 of them and never had an issue. Here is an old post from them.
The plot thickens...ARC rings will be just fine with a z comp. i have 2 of them and never had an issue. Here is an old post from them.
Haha
More reasons to buy leupold.
American made
Indestructible
Cost 1/3 of these ones that all you people have issues with
When’s the last time you heard a Leupold break a lens? It’s because they are made in the USA. Not jap junk