Watching the latest game of thrones happenings in DC

Well we're definitely back. ;)
This had 'epic' written all over it before the first page was full. The man of the hour sounds vaguely familiar, but I could be wrong.

Dear Mr. Dazed n Confused:

You have every right to post whatever you want, wherever you want. I'd say you've made not only your point, but your presence known. The first is considered a positive note, the second, well, time will tell. Best advice at this point, break contact, enjoy some other Hide experiences, and carry on. You still have time to recover somewhat. If you're gonna get all emotional n shit then please be advised 'that' will never bode well here. If you can't see the writing on the wall and choose to continue to poke the Bears then that's on you. Choices brother, it's all about choices.

Carry on. :cool:

 
  • Like
Reactions: jr81452
LOL I thought you were going to ignore me? You couldn't ignore me if you tried, snowflake.

Again, you assume merely because I don't drink YOUR koolaid, that I must be a Democrat. Your thinking is incredibly 2-dimensional.

I just think that people like you, who are willing to sell-off our democracy to the Russian intelligence service for the price of a single election, are not only stupid, but traitors.

Someday, I hope you face a traitor's fate.

There is no ignore function on this board as of yet. Hopefully, that will change. My colleague of the shitting gymnast avatar is correct. We're back. In fact, someone, or perhaps simply someone of a genre is back. I'm fairly certain that the politics is only a device, that it merely looks to gainsay whatever it thinks to be the conventional wisdom of a group of like-minded individuals in order to create rancor and attract attention. It has the ability to type anything that it so desires and press the send button, yes, and the management retains sole rights here to become bored with its antics and eliminate it like this morning's glory.

Pull the trigger once, pull the trigger twice, a Pyle will still pull the trigger and stay locked in its last frame forever, going no further than the first reel. And really, who are we kidding about politics merely being a vehicle? Labeling all those as fascists and turncoats who disagree is the ingrained tactic of the day, and by its implementation such a resolute Gomer paints itself as orange in the face as an Oompa Loompa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1J04
So I sit here thinking to myself "Im a reasonable person. Why cant I see 6pt5rookie's side of this? Im a skeptic isn't there a slight chance the media is legit, perhaps 'fake news' doesn't exist?"

But than I start reading the news and I realize it is all total bullshit and can think nothing other than that journalists, despite being given enormous responsibility, have decided to commit mass seppuku seeking favor with a false god.

The "attack last night in Sweden" is nothing other than another attempt to delegitimize Trump. I watched Tucker Carlson the night before yesterdays rally (hosted by the fill in WH correspondent from Fox) and there was a piece done about a film maker investigating the result of mass refugee migration from the middle east in Sweden. Trump never said "muslim terror attack" he said something about "what we saw in Sweden last night" referencing the Tucker Carlson piece.

It was interesting to note Swedens media puts out the same fake news our media does. It was stated if there is refugee crime "a Stockholm man" will have been reported as having committed the offense but isn't it interesting that when Sven Bang Olliesson goes through a red light its "Sven Bang Olliessson of 1515 PippieLongstocking Way recklessly and dangerously risked every Swedes life by going through a red light"

Sweden, despite being a socialist state that actually in some ways works, can not be allowed to exist. Its homogeneity is what allowed its social policies to work but its homogeneity of the people is a greater threat to the globalists and they will sacrifice an example of working socialism to end that threat.

So now we have the likes of Chelsea Clinton trolling Trump with "What terrorism in Sweden? Were the Bowling Green terrorists arrested there?" The no talent bitch better tread carefully because she is showing her ass and her ignorance. Using Bowling Green as a joke or taking it lightly is no joke. The "Iraqi refugees" that were arrested in that plot left DNA and fingerprint evidence on IED's that burned and maimed American soldiers in Iraq. I suggest she go to a VA hospital and tell some Trooper that lost his legs that the Bowling Green guys are "a joke". When they were scooped up it looks like on video they were buying AKs RPGs and PKM's for some reason other than completing their curio and relics collection.

That's the real news everything else is FAKE NEWS!

Now 6pt why do they do this? Id love to hear your answer.

I will tell you mine.

They are trying to delegitimize Trump and make him seem the fool, Where was this requirement for clarity and IQ when Obama was visiting "57" United States or "in Austria where they speak Austrian". Why do I have to search Youtube to see the videos of Obama going blank when his teleprompter shits the bed? How about the first Romney debate when we were witness to his "smartest man in the room" arrogance and it was plain to see who he is without proper programming. Or why aren't we allowed to know that during Benghazi he was in a fetal position under the WH kitchen table bemoaning he would be a one term POTUS not realizing until told by others that the media is in his pocket and milquetoast Romney has no fight.

The media wont mention Trumps policy. Things like killing two regulations for any new regulation proposed, saving the jobs in the coal industry, bringing back American steel production and others. The people want those things and the left loses in trying to challenge his recent moves. Their strategy is of course to make Trump ineffective. A legitimate tactic to do this is to propose policy that is better than his. Ideologically they cant propose policies that are better than his because their policies are designed to destroy the country. The only tactic they have is to make noise that conceals what he has done than try to win back those that left the Dems for Trump not through better policy, which they don't have, but by making those middle of the road voters think they made a mistake in November. Anyone that does change will be breaking the cardinal rule of successful test taking - don't ever change your first answer - its is more often than not the right one.

Trump kicked ass for an hour and twenty minutes on the media the other day. Was it wise to stir the hornets nest? By not stirring it could he expect better treatment?

Fuck the media they made their bed, let them live with their self brought about irrelevance.

They were given a trust that amounts to the 4th branch of government and they failed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1J04
There doesn't have to be 1000s in on the conspiracy.

All you need is 40 years of indoctrination through the schools and you have a population of useful idiots to draw from. Useful idiots - whats old is new, and true.

Promote the true believers and guide them with the positioning of a Cronkite, Rather or Stephanopoulos. Their brains are like putty they will perform.

If that's the truth of it, then the folks at the top are going to kick our ass. Applying a standard IQ metric of 1/50 having an IQ north of 130, and the fact that there were 33k full time newspaper journalists in the US in 2015, then you get 3300 who have an intelligence high enough to detect the pattern and question it. If only 10% are not indoctrinated, that is still 330 smart people who would be trying to spread the truth. With the anonymity afforded to the clever in our time, I find it difficult to believe we don't have some solid proof at this point. And that is only the full time newspaper journalists. If we include TV and other media, the base number goes north of 100k. If the elite can suppress that number of dissenters, without the benefit of random polygraph and loyalty tests that our security apparatus utilizes, then we are well and truly fucked.

Your firearm example is a good one to show the homogeneity and patterning of the news - how is it all the time these diverse competitive orgs always end up with the same buzz words? Lately I hear the term "Extreme OUI" across the networks - standby your being conditioned for anyone above some arbitrary threshold to be getting enhanced penalties. Pie eyed is pie eyed but we got to keep the lawyers paid.

You may as well point out the conspiracy to spread the term "lol". Put another way, if I were in a meeting of the biggest players in firearms news, how many would know what spinD is? "Monkey see monkey do" is a powerful and innate instinct of the human condition. Common terminology in the age of mass interconnection neither supports nor discounts the likelihood of collaboration. I don't even follow gossip and I still know the terms Benifer and Brangolina. Buzzwords are the modern plague (and I just used another one).
 
6pt5 I don't think you are a Democrat.

I think you voted Gary Johnson.

Fine I like some libertarian shit but realizing the realities of November and presented with only two options it wasn't too hard to realize it was no time to "hope".

Through the cloud of pot smoke its okay to have "hope" but the choice in November required sober clarity and pragmatism.

There was no room for "hope".
 
If that's the truth of it, then the folks at the top are going to kick our ass. Applying a standard IQ metric of 1/50 having an IQ north of 130, and the fact that there were 33k full time newspaper journalists in the US in 2015, then you get 3300 who have an intelligence high enough to detect the pattern and question it. If only 10% are not indoctrinated, that is still 330 smart people who would be trying to spread the truth. With the anonymity afforded to the clever in our time, I find it difficult to believe we don't have some solid proof at this point. And that is only the full time newspaper journalists. If we include TV and other media, the base number goes north of 100k. If the elite can suppress that number of dissenters, without the benefit of random polygraph and loyalty tests that our security apparatus utilizes, then we are well and truly fucked.



You may as well point out the conspiracy to spread the term "lol". Put another way, if I were in a meeting of the biggest players in firearms news, how many would know what spinD is? "Monkey see monkey do" is a powerful and innate instinct of the human condition. Common terminology in the age of mass interconnection neither supports nor discounts the likelihood of collaboration. I don't even follow gossip and I still know the terms Benifer and Brangolina. Buzzwords are the modern plague (and I just used another one).

How many media sources are there?

You realize that the number of news and media sources have been consolidating?

You don't need the employees...you need the owners. There are a small number of owners. You remember your Marx don't you? Wages are a strong motivator that puts the worker at the mercy of the capital owner. If the liberals are sayings its bad they are guilty of doing it. Combine that with a field that attracts people convinced of their greatness. The owner sets the tone, the narcissistic, extremely well paid useful idiot is only to happy to be a compliant "news reader" given the title "journalist"

Where do your minority of journalists with character go. The outlets are oligarchic. All they have is the internet and the blogs, and thank God we do have them. For now until Obamas giving the net to the UN takes full effect unless something changes that.

Regards talking points. Its not mass perception and picking up on "common terminology" or "monkey see, monkey do". All the outlets advertise as looking to differentiate themselves from their competitors as would be expected in a competitive market yet turn the channels and you will see CNN saying the same things MSNBC says which parrots whatever ABC, CBS, and NBC say than the NY Times gives us the print version. Sure Fox differentiates and isn't it interesting they crush in the ratings. I also like One America News for their news not so much their commentators. I get a better look from foreign press. I think the talking points are somewhat muddled in translation.
 
Last edited:
I still sense a disturbance in the force, but it's more like a single cloud scudding across the sky and creating a few minutes of relative shade on an otherwise brilliant afternoon.

Oh, and fancy this: a ten-page thread is now an eight-page one. Imagine that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArmyJerry
[No message]
 

Attachments

  • photo47245.jpg
    photo47245.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 18
First, lets be specific on what you think my "side" is.

From the start, my argument is that there is sufficient stink here that a full and complete independent investigation needs to be made and we have the courage to deal with what we find, even if some of that dirt ends up on "your guys".

That seems to me to be a reasonable position. You can't see the reasonableness of that "side?"


Second, I have no intention of being the media's champion. I think there is some good reporting, I think there is some bad reporting. I think some stories are true, I think some stories are false. I think some reporters try to remain as objective as humanly possible. I think some reporters less their partisan goggles obscure their view. I think there is some fake news on CNN. I think there is some fake news on FOX and BREITBART.

I try and read as broad a spectrum of viewpoints as I can to average it all out. I don't dismiss any source out of hand, and I don't swallow any whole-sale.

If enough evidence was shown to investigate Trump, his campaign partners, the Republican Party etc. then I think most of us would be fine with that. However, there are multiple problems with this.

We all know that most politicians are two sides of the same coin. We would have to investigate all for it to be fair, not just Trump. And the reason so many here think you are a troll is simply because all you have stated is that we should investigate Trump and the Russians the entire time. I think if you added that we should investigate the rest of the crooked politicians as well, name any you like, then the responses you have gotten may have been somewhat different. Where was all of this push for the truth when it seemed so apparent the last leader and his cronies were up to no good? That's what people are mad about. The hypocrisy is rampant.

At any rate Trump is somewhat of an outsider so we can hope that he is a man of character and a man of his word and give hope to the rest of the country that would like to combat this stuff. Many relate to him because he seems to speak for the people and honestly he is kind of seeming like the last beacon of hope. So, again I am not sure how you investigate in fairness. Even if everyone agreed to your independent investigative party then who gets to choose them? How do you keep bias out of the investigation. I for one don't believe there is anyone that can apply the law fairly and without bias. You can argue that some may apply it better than others but it's impossible to any one person to suppress bias completely. We are all human and we all have bias despite what anyone wants to say. I say bring your investigation on. I bet they don't find anything. And if they do how does one prove it was legit? There seems to be an overwhelming group of people trying to delegitimize the current administration yet seemingly tried to help the last one. How do you rule out that any evidence is not planted or made up evidence? Do you see where I am going here?
 
Last edited:
First, lets be specific on what you think my "side" is.

From the start, my argument is that there is sufficient stink here that a full and complete independent investigation needs to be made and we have the courage to deal with what we find, even if some of that dirt ends up on "your guys".

That seems to me to be a reasonable position. You can't see the reasonableness of that "side?"


Second, I have no intention of being the media's champion. I think there is some good reporting, I think there is some bad reporting. I think some stories are true, I think some stories are false. I think some reporters try to remain as objective as humanly possible. I think some reporters less their partisan goggles obscure their view. I think there is some fake news on CNN. I think there is some fake news on FOX and BREITBART.

I try and read as broad a spectrum of viewpoints as I can to average it all out. I don't dismiss any source out of hand, and I don't swallow any whole-sale.
Look prior to the election Trump was excoriated for being UnAmerican should he question the results of the election Hillary was ordained to win. There might as well have been no election the media and dems were that confident.

Well things didn't turn out as planned and the truth being Hillary sucked wasn't acceptable but more importantly the fact that the Dems went with her stung even more because I think Bernie would have won.

He promised enough free shit that the gimmes would have come out for him. Even the gimmes knew Hillary was taking all the money on the table.

Fake news had to be created to explain the loss anf hide the strategic failure - bring on the Russians.

If the dems are too stupid to not realize every comm is probed by China and Russia they don't deserve the office. Hillarys stupidity with her server invited the Russians in. They have her 30K emails, we don't. She would have been blackmailed for that. Again it was her arrogance and stupidity

Second Podesta's stupidity opened the dor to hack his shit and than infect the Dem computers. If the dumb fuck hadn't been doing business on a computer I can afford, than not opened the email "Meet Russian Women (or Men)" no one would no about his penchant for watching some chick drink menstrual blood or that the dem party holds us all in contempt.

Working at AmEmbassy Moscow in the 80s I knew than the Russians knew what I ate at every meal and that was when shit had to be written with pencil and paper a much more secure means of communication.

The dems were warned by the FBI they were being probed as did the repubs. The repubs did something about it. The dems likely didn't care because they talk to Putin all the time especially when selling uranium - they didn't care.

There is no need for an invest it is dem arrogance and stupidity that caused the wikileaks.

The only reason for the invest is to stop a process we voted for and want.

Do you realize the enemies of the country probe us every second of the day?

Do you realize how stupid Hillary and Podesta are.

Who of those two are to blame. The hyena doing what hyenas do in nature or the two that no the nature of the hyena and laid there with their legs spread.

There is no there, there only the stupidity of the dems.

Do you think we are virgins?

Why was the NSA under Obama capturing all of house frau mekles comms?

You are not making sense PT.
 
Well, uhh I could say the same thing about Flynn not assuming his call to a Russian ambassador wouldn't get recorded by our NSA. LOL




Well, we disagree. I think there are compelling reasons for us to find out the extent to which Russia has begun manipulating our elections.

And again, you are assuming Trump is guilty of something and has to be shielded.

My guess (just my opinion), is that the most likely scenario is that yes, the Russians used cyber attacks to attempt to influence the our election and tilt it in Trumps favor. They probably felt he would be easier to make deals with, more flexible on Ukraine, less wedded to NATO or promoting human rights in Russia.

My guess (just my opinion), is that Trump was merely the innocent beneficiary of that effort. My guess is that the transcripts of any contact between the Trump camp and Russian officials will turn out to be rather boring, innocuous preliminary diplomatic contact.

Getting all that out in the open would be a big help to Trump, remove the cloud of suspicion and make it easier to move past the 2016 election.

Flynn was spied on by US. His having contact with his future counterpart was not illegal. It happens before every admin change. Do you doubt that had there been anything in those conversations we wouldn't have heard it by now?

What was illegal is that the agency listening in did not redact Flynns identity and that the fact it happened was leaked to the press. Does it indicate anything to you that a week before leaving office Obama opened up access to this type of information to all our spy agencies. Prior to his changing the rule only the NSA would have had access to the info. In order to access it other agencies would have had to go through a process. So Obama basically insured that instead of having one suspect now there are something like 16.

You don't smell anything rotten with that?

Again what motivation is there to elect Trump when Hillary is a fellow traveler with legs spread. They have her server emails and she sells our strategic elements as cheap as a Bill Clinton speech for a million dollars.

Your suppositions are illogical.
 
PS

The cloud of suspicion is a manufacture of the Dems and the establishment. They will never clear it. It is all they have to try to slow down Trump.

Thing is we are not buying it.

You are but that's only because your panties are still in a awad because we didn't vote for the brilliance of Gary Johnson and my idiot drunk ex governor weld.
 
Protests in Worcester MA tonight. Participants included people clad in black with black face veils in their own little group.

Someone wants one party rule. If they keep asking for it it may be decided.
 
Protests in Worcester MA tonight. Participants included people clad in black with black face veils in their own little group.

Someone wants one party rule. If they keep asking for it it may be decided.

Same old crap...These Occupy Worcester fucks have been around for years. My son graduated WPI so I used to visit the place. Not many reasons to go there and now there are fewer
 
Same old crap...These Occupy Worcester fucks have been around for years. My son graduated WPI so I used to visit the place. Not many reasons to go there and now there are fewer

I get this mental image of the poor besieged bastards in their black leotards, with the mean old Trumpers riding out from Boston to seize their laptops at each and every Starbucks along the way. It's the very beginning of the Revolution! *chortle*
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1J04
I get this mental image of the poor besieged bastards in their black leotards, with the mean old Trumpers riding out from Boston to seize their laptops at each and every Starbucks along the way. It's the very beginning of the Revolution! *chortle*

LOL. Not from Boston.

They would be riding in from the Central and Western part of the state
 
LOL. Not from Boston.

They would be riding in from the Central and Western part of the state

Well aware of where one goes from the red, through the purple zone, and into the blue up there. It was the historical thing, the Gagian excursion to seize stores of powder and shot in April, 1775 that I was having fun with. The wife has knee-jerk Libtard family in CT, MA, and NH, and any trip to the corner pocket involving me comes with a strict AYCE lobster roll stipulation in return for feigning polite non-reaction to their propogandistic Jackass Party pokes.
 
Yes. The Patriot Act (Passed by Bush with a Republican Congress if I recall) allows the NSA to record the conversations of US citizens if the counter-party is a foreign national (You know, like a Russian ambassador LOL).

And though I'm not okay with that. Recording Flynn was lawful and Flynn making the call was lawful.

What don't you understand about the fact that the law was broken when the identity of Flynn, a citizen not breaking the law, was revealed? The revealer was a US agency not a Russian one.

If you think Russia was subversive hacking Hillarys and Podestas Walmart brand security network don't you agree its subversive for a security agent of this govt to break our laws to protect citizens from random spying. Where is your libertarianism?

Similar security laws were broken when Trumps calls to Mexico and Australia were revealed. The difference in that case was that Trump was on an Oval Office phone which I think we can agree has better security features than Hillarys shitter placed Walmart server. This is a serious breach and can only have been committed by an internal weasel. What will happen when he discusses serious stuf ther than the wall and Obamas coddling of terrorists.

Do do you agree the intel swamp needs to be drained of those loyal to party or their agency over country?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SilentStalkr
Thanks.

Yes I voted Libertarian, and yes Gary was a goof. I vote Libertarian on general principal now days because I'd like to see a viable 3rd party build up to challenge our existing binary choice.

At the heart of it, I like the basic Libertarian ideals.

I don't begrudge you voting for Trump. The only thing I would ask of Trump voters is to face any new information with an objective eye and be willing to look in to what you are not comfortable looking into and have the intellectual courage to accept what you find without defaulting to knee-jerk tribal defensiveness.

Nixon did some great things, and some shit he did went over the line. Life isn't always black and white. Adults just accept that and deal with reality.

I think I could respect libertarian shit if they were willing to go full retard.

Example letting adults access drugs on the basis of their adulthood.

Im all for it but it must include also the complete elimination of any govt funded treatment for addiction. Either let Darwin handle the bad choices or they can fund their own treatment.

I haven't heard a libertarian call for that yet. Maybe I don't listen hard enough.
 
Last edited:
First, I wouldn't characterize it as "investigating Trump." That shouldn't be the focus. It should be an investigation of the integrity of our election process.

It should examine the possibility and extent of any foreign interference.
It should examine the communication and contact between our citizens and foreign intelligence operatives during the campaign. What was the extent of that contact, what was the purpose.
It also needs to examine if the charges of wide spread illegal voting was true.

I think any loyal American should feel these question need to be answered. We don't have to agree with the results of an election, but we do have to have faith that the entire thing isn't a sham. If people start believing that, they may start to feel violence is a better mechanism to effect change than the ballot box. That's not a situation I hope any of us want.

You are right that fairness and objectivity would be vital. If the investigation is seen to be compromised by either party, at least half of America won't accept the results.

That's why I don't think it can be the Trump DOJ, or the Republican House/Senate. And for the same reasons, I wouldn't turn it over to Pelosi or Schumer.

You would want to find a loyal American that has done honorable service for this country in a non-partisan context. A retired Federal Judge or Retired general officer. Colin Powell type? Someone who's reputation both sides would agree was beyond reproach. Surely we could find someone that the majority of non-extremists could agree upon.

You give them a committee, a staff, and full subpoena power, and let them do their job.

Surely you are not suggesting that because Trump has enemies that he must be considered beyond investigation. That would be a very dangerous situation. The founding fathers would never have wanted someone with the sweeping powers of the Presidency to ever be considered beyond investigation. The founding fathers created the other branches of government, and the freedom of the press, exactly to keep a powerful executive in check.

Why investigate. You want integrity.

1. Positive ID

2. No early voting. Make the day a holiday if you need to.

3. Count the servicemember vote. Don't hold it in reserve to be counted only if it looks close.

4. Paper ballots and make sure the ballots counted, match the door entrance count.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SilentStalkr
Well aware of where one goes from the red, through the purple zone, and into the blue up there. It was the historical thing, the Gagian excursion to seize stores of powder and shot in April, 1775 that I was having fun with. The wife has knee-jerk Libtard family in CT, MA, and NH, and any trip to the corner pocket involving me comes with a strict AYCE lobster roll stipulation in return for feigning polite non-reaction to their propogandistic Jackass Party pokes.

Interesting Veer...I never put 2 and 2 together.

If you visit Boston again and want the worlds best in Lobster roll, go to Neptune's Oyster...pricey but the best I have had.
 
And though I'm not okay with that. Recording Flynn was lawful and Flynn making the call was lawful.

What don't you understand about the fact that the law was broken when the identity of Flynn, a citizen not breaking the law, was revealed? The revealer was a US agency not a Russian one.

If you think Russia was subversive hacking Hillarys and Podestas Walmart brand security network don't you agree its subversive for a security agent of this govt to break our laws to protect citizens from random spying. Where is your libertarianism?

I think he's really more of a Summer Soldier type, if not simply a mendacious provocateur. He lacks the wherewithal of a true Winter Soldier.
[IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"http:\/\/i.imgur.com\/Jwshidk.jpg"}[/IMG2]


Similar security laws were broken when Trumps calls to Mexico and Australia were revealed. The difference in that case was that Trump was on an Oval Office phone which I think we can agree has better security features than Hillarys shitter placed Walmart server. This is a serious breach and can only have been committed by an internal weasel. What will happen when he discusses serious stuf ther than the wall and Obamas coddling of terrorists.

Do do you agree the intel swamp needs to be drained of those loyal to party or their agency over country?

Unless you're trying to be like your interlocutor and leverage your investment in Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing, it might be time to just -- move on -- from this one. You're dealing with an ideological gila monster.
 
I think he's really more of a Summer Soldier type, if not simply a mendacious provocateur. He lacks the wherewithal of a true Winter Soldier.
[IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"http:\/\/i.imgur.com\/Jwshidk.jpg"}[/IMG2]




Unless you're trying to be like your interlocutor and leverage your investment in Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing, it might be time to just -- move on -- from this one. You're dealing with an ideological gila monster.

Nah, moving on hasn't worked. Talk em til the point their head explodes or they do something stupid to reveal their true colors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArmyJerry
Can you quote any post of mine where I dispute that?


Here is a thought you should at least consider. Perhaps it wasn't the US intelligence service that leaked that info. If I were the head of Russian intelligence I would certainly consider leaking that info to deprive my enemy of an important security officer and make the President think he is being betrayed from within. Make it look like the leaks came from US intelligence.

Wouldn't Putin love to drive a wedge between the President and the US intelligence community? Wouldn't that be very useful to hamstring an adversary? Sowing distrust and dissection within their own ranks?


Apparently there will be an IG investigation into the leaks.

And Apparently there is going to be a Congressional investigation into the Russian interference in our election. I'd prefer an independent counsel, but this is probably as good as I'm going to get. Hopefully there will be enough heat and attention on this investigation that an attempt at white-wash won't be possible.

So, at this point I'm content to just wait and see how things play out over the next 6 months.

If you are proposing an investigation of the leak that released Flynns ID and the Oval office phone calls than we are on the same page.

If you are proposing an invest of Trump colluding with Russia in hopes that Podesta would be stupid enough to on his own defeat his high speed McAfee security system or hoping Hillary would be running an illegal Lifelock protected server on which she conducted TS govt business than you are a purveyor of FAKE NEWS. We know what happened the Dems were arrogant stupid fucks. End of story.

That's the truth of it. The reality is so stupid and immature I can understand your disbelief and need to find some supervillian to prop up your heros but the fact is Wikileaks is a simple answer - extreme stupidity.
 
Last edited:
Just waiting to hear the next theory pulled from the ass......

Now its Putin trying to divorce Trump from his security apparatus.

That's being attempted but the fingerprints on that conspiracy are brought to you by Organizing for America and the entitled establishment.

Putin is just the disinterested, entertained benefactor.
 
Excuse me Ive got some rounds to shoot so I can update my post in the bolt action section. If you go there be careful the post features a gun. I don't want to "trigger" you or offend you.
 
Does anyone really think Washington, whether congress, special prosecutor or the fbi, are capable of a fair investigation? Somehow a major source of corruption in this country is going to accomplish that?
 
Maybe if you buy its ballpoint pen and the piece of hard candy it'll make quota and they'll let it have some tofu with its brown rice tonight?
 
He is fun for what he brings to the table.

Id just like to see him put it in a post the following facts......

Hillary, Podesta and their ilk have shown by their actions/stupidity that they are unqualified for any public office

Wikileaks obtaining info was because of the stupidity of the Dems

The wikileaks was accurate but accurate in a salute to Dan Rather and the information confirmed that that breed of democrat is a contemptible loathsome sort of creature.

Hillary selling uranium to the Russians and the clinto foundation crimes are magnitudes of severity beyind anything squirrel top has done

Flynn talking to his counterpart was not illegal or untoward. Appointees do it every administration.

The release of Flynns name by a spy agency was unlawful

The release of Trumps phone calls was unlawful

The continued obstruction in the name of this fake news is designed as some sort of life raft to try and resurrect a dem party that is on its third trip under and their actions are like adding lead to their weight belts.

Gary Johnson and Bill are bone smoking bourbon drinkers incapable of actually running the country. But they are otherwise nice men in my book.

When it came time to be pragmatic and grown up Pvt Pyle stomped his feet, threw a hissy fit and held his breath until he passed out only to wake up and find during his unconsciousness he had shit and pissed himself.

Admit to each of those items above because all are truth except one and that one is speculation derived from judging your activity here.
 
Excuse me Ive got some rounds to shoot so I can update my post in the bolt action section. If you go there be careful the post features a gun. I don't want to "trigger" you or offend you.


Been watching that post. Like what I see. If you don't mind I'm gonna hit the door with you and hang some steel. Rain stopped. Wanna see if this new 168 and 175 load will hit the broad side of a barn.;)

 
Been watching that post. Like what I see. If you don't mind I'm gonna hit the door with you and hang some steel. Rain stopped. Wanna see if this new 168 and 175 load will hit the broad side of a barn.;)

Shoot away brother that's what this place is about not the circle jerk Pyle wants it to be.

I look forward to a time when politics is a topic that doesn't consume me. It will signal that some elitist isn't off somewhere thinking he can make decisions about my families life better than we can.
 
The best and most appropriate assessment of the situation I have seen so far is that the Dems haven't been this pissed since Lincoln took their slaves away. I hope they react the same way, just hoping and hoping, we can clean up a lot of issues that been simmering 80 years.