Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll go with Weatherby being a genius. I won't go with space warfare, or 100 years. He found that shot out WWI rifles still held good hunting accuracy when the muzzle was cut back and crowned. Meaning the freebore caused by erosion didn't affect accuracy all that much. He combined magnum power and a better freebore to get phenominal speeds with good accuracy. The double radius shoulders didn't do all that much for the pressure/flow curve. But, it is proprietary and therefore made him money. It helped that he catered to a wealthy crowd.Roy Weatherby was a genius and his rifles were primarily designed for space warfare. The man was 100 years ahead of his time and so are his rifles.
I'm not trying to sell or advocate for Meopta. I own one Meopro, about a $900 Scope. Not Like a 3K Minox. I was just wanting to know why they dont get used as much as others if the glass is as good as it is. Y'all have answered those questions for me.
I actually own two Swaro Z5's and one NXS.
As far as new to this, I meant new to long range steel shooting. I have been hunting my whole life and just built a 1000 Yard Range on my place. 800 yard hunting has come as it has presented itself. Elk in Idaho, which I missed, Mule Deer in Colorado, Whitetails in Texas. Most shots are not 800 but plenty have been in the 500-600 Yard Range. Longest shot on a taken animal was on a cull doe at 813 using the Z5.
And as far as stalking goes, I didn't do any running of my mouth until you did. You are the one with your name in your username. Ill be in Corpus Christi next weekend to do some fishing if you would like to talk more.
I was gonna say, I'm not too fond of the Burris BDC. I have one in my 6-24 Black diamond. As far as fucked up goes, while I love Burris scopes for glass and repeatability, the BDC is so different between stadia, and ad power differences, it totally sucks. It sucks worse than my Meopta's for use.Sorry I have to make a correction to my story that rifle actually had a leupold 3-10 on it. I got mixed up.
I would love to have a ZD. Problems are crappy reticles, old scope design (external battery at back of scope), and second focal plane. Even there Mildot looks like something that came off from a 70's scope. They need to develop a modern tactical line that competes with NF/Kahles and the rest. Right now I see their focus as being on the Euro hunting scene. I think they can make great glass and solid scopes mechanically, I don't think many PRS shooters use a duplex reticle. So much potential not being used. They could have a major impact on the US market if they listen to what the market wants and quit moving at the speed of a sloth. I will be one of the first in line if they get their head out of the sand.I understand the increase in marketing. Meopta isnt marketed like the big names I listed above. Thus the reason Meopta gear is half the price of all other European made optics, which there are few left.
My question is to why there arent't many people advocating for them that actually shoot in the PRS world etc. Seems like if you can get their Equivalent or comparable option to the PMII, Razor, ATACR, etc for half the cost, more people would be doing it.
I also heard/read somewhere that Swarovski-Kahles gets their glass from Meopta do to the fact that it is cheaper to get it made by Meopta in Czech Republic than in Austria. So that really made me question why people pay 3300 for a K624 or 25I Kahles if i can get the same glass with better coatings from Meopta.
I don't need to be sold and convinced on their quality, I can dial and shoot accurately with their Meopro out to 800 easily. I could only imagine what the ZD would bring. I just want to know why nobody speaks of them, uses them or even writes reviews for them. I can't seem to find very much out there where someone has used them in PRS or hunting applications. Everyone is quick to brag on their 3K scopes or advocate for said scopes, just don't understand why there is not any data-reviews on the ZD line etc. Maybe I am missing something, but if it performs to similar levels as all other lines of optics, why not pay half the cost for 100% made European Scope?
I guess what I really want to know is if there is anyone out there that can talk me out of spending the $1800 or so on the 6-24X56 Illuminated ZD before I drop the cash on it versus ATACR, PMII, Kahles or SWARO
I was leaning towards the new K625I from Kahles and ATACR before I stumbled upon this information. With 3K scopes, am I going to pay for a better scope than what Meopta Offers or am I going to pay for their Marketing?
PS - I'm new to all this stuff and don't have the money to be jumping from scope to scope.
here is a link to that scope
https://www.meoptasportsoptics.com/us/produkt/zd-6-24x56-rd-728/
Any input would be appreciated.
Thanks,Bee
Or they just have better glass and better reticles. I'd buy an Athlon Cronus over the Meopta, better glass IMO and I prefer the reticles.I simple thing its because they are not expensive. people feel the top expensive scopes are the best.
No, most of the time, alpha tier scopes are exponentially better and refined to the point of not even being in the same ballpark.I simple thing its because they are not expensive. people feel the top expensive scopes are the best.
Finally someone with some common sense!I think personally that the Meopta is better than the Nightforce.
People just be paying for the name, and it makes them feel better.
The ZD 6-24 was originally a joint venture with Meopta and the Czech military to my knowledge. That being said, with input from forums such as this, we are definitely looking to provide products in the future that will better fit the competitive optics market. FFP is certainly one of the improvements we are looking into (no pun intended).
Yes, true. Except that poster hasn’t been seen here since 8/18, so five years ago. Anything new on the Meopta scene since then?It's very refreshing to see someone whose behind these optics show up and welcome input. Very interested in how this plays out/what comes out of this.
Nightforce buys the Meopta spotter and slaps their brand label into them and adds a lot more dah-las KA-CHINGGGG to the price.I think personally that the Meopta is better than the Nightforce.
People just be paying for the name, and it makes them feel better.
Meopta Optika 6 4-27x50 30mm FFP illuminated RD MRAD1 Koshkin's DLO easy to see horseshoe reticle sane as the 3-18x currently on sale for $674.97 at Sportsman's with free shipping and 5-30x56 34mm FFP illuminated RD MRAD reticle (without the center horseshoe) on sale for $699.99 at Scopelist and EuroOptic with free shipping really can't go wrong at these sale prices. Lifetime warranty including their electronics.S2 spotter, B1 Plus 15x56/8x32 bino and R1 Fixed 7x scope are some of the best glass you will find regardless of price point.
Optika 6 has a high cost/performance ratio but is a bit hindered by less than popular feature sets.
3-18x50 MRAD and MRAD1 are great options
Their glass are at least on par if not better than the Burris XTR3 and XTR PRO somewhere in between.No, most of the time, alpha tier scopes are exponentially better and refined to the point of not even being in the same ballpark.
Meopta isn’t bad, they’re just staying in their own lane…Budget optics.
I used to sell Meopta, Zeiss, and Burris when I worked at the gun store. Granted, Meopta was a fledgling company here in the USA back then, and not very popular, but the old oringal MeoStar scopes were nice for the price. But they were certainly nowhere near top-tier. And honestly, the old cheap Burris scopes were so bad, that's why I never owned one, and didn't even give them a look for another 20 years after working there. Because of all the talk about them recently, i've looked through an Optika6 enough at my local store in the last few months to know what the glass compares to, and it compares very closely to my newer production XTR-II 5-25x50. Everyone's eyes are different, but through mine, they are VERY close.Their glass are at least on par if not better than the Burris XTR3 and XTR PRO somewhere in between.
Definitely better than the XTR2s.
You should try one from a return friendly dealer who has free returns from Walmart or Midway USA or Optics Planet. Nevermind if you don't get the vest organic ce since you're only borrowing it to compare to what you already have for the duration of their free returns policy. I suggested 2 specific Meopta Optika 6 scopes on sale but I don't know if they offer free returns that's why I suggested Walmart, Midway USA and Optics Planet regardless if they're not on sale since you're not keeping them anyway and if you do decide you want one of them after comparing both of these to your own scopes, return them for refund then buy them again for a lot cheaper on sale from Sportsman's 4.5-27x50 30mm MRAD1 $674.97 and Scopelist or EuroOptic 5-30x56 34mm MRAD $699.99.
I think it's closer in comparison to the Cronus BTR Gen 2 with the glass quality edge going to the much cheaper Meopta. I personally have reservations about the ETR line from Athlon just based on their sheer cost even when they go on sale vs actual value for what you really get and the fact they're still made in China abeit the best made in China optics if you get one without any defects. I think the Ares ETR 4.5-30x56 would be worth buying if they went in sale for $600-$650 IMHO and 3-18x50 ETR for $500-$550 based on country of manufacture and the fact the Ares BTR G2 4.5-27x50 is on sale for $565.49 and the Meopta Optika 6 5-30x56 34mm Illuminated FFP $699.99 and 4.5-27x50 FFP illuminated MRAD1 (Koshkin's DLO special easy to see center horseshoe MRAD1 reticle) for $674.97 at Sportsman's. Apply and get approved for their credit card for even a cheaper price off of this scope and earn several hundreds of dollars worth in rewards spending credit using the Sportsman's credit card all over the place outside of Sportsman's. Thank me later. Probably get at least another $200 off in the future when buying anything from Sportsman's using the credit card rewards earned then if they still have this Meopta in stock at the current sale price it's $474.97 or next time Vortex Razor Gen 1 20-60x85 spotting scope goes on sale for $749.99-$200.00 rewards = $549.99.I just bought a Optika 6 5-30.
IQ wise I haven't seen better in a FFP scope for the $699 I paid. General quality I'd put it less than Athlon ETR, mostly the turrets.
I think we always need to distinguish between "build quality" i.e. ruggedness, and "perceived build quality" i.e. fit and finish.I wouldn't put build quality close to the G2 Cronus, like two full steps down from it and one step down to the ETR, but my Optika 6 does have superior IQ than both.
Thankfully it did deliver in that respect or I'd be disappointed. The fact that the turret lines aren't lined up with the line on the housing and that there is no rev indicator miffed me a bit.
Still I just like nice glass.
Nah, I've got more scopes than rifles right now so I'm going to wait until the G3 Cronus comes out until I start selling some other scopes to fund the purchase.
But I'm getting better informed in my opinions about "all" these scopes which includes Athlon. As always personal preferences make a big difference.
Now if I could afford having TT's and ZCO's on my better rifles much of my searching would be over
Yep and at the same time the price often doubles or triples. That being mentioned I don't want to go into my tirade of my expensive scopes having to go back to the factory for repair or having weird optical funkyness.I think we always need to distinguish between "build quality" i.e. ruggedness, and "perceived build quality" i.e. fit and finish.
They do not always necessarily run together.
Isn't it normal or expected for overly expensive European made optics to need occasional factory service from time to time?Yep and at the same time the price often doubles or triples. That being mentioned I don't want to go into my tirade of my expensive scopes having to go back to the factory for repair or having weird optical funkyness.
Their glass are at least on par if not better than the Burris XTR3 and XTR PRO somewhere in between.
Burris has the Meoptas beat when it comes to their huge wide angle FOV that's for sure. Meoptas are just like looking through Leupolds.I'm not saying this as a Burris shooter or bias guy, I'm saying this as a long time experienced long range/PRS shooter with two good eyes and a lot of optics experience. That comparison doesn't jibe with what I've seen.
You can take it as bias as you wish.
I've run rounds through a rifle with an Optika 6 3-18 in FFP and a BDC. I had an 18x XTRIII at the range on a 6.5 creed gasser. It gave up clarity to the XTRIII, and a lot of FOV. The Pro is much nicer on a lot of levels.
It's a good scope, I'm not knocking it. Very similar to the XTRII in price point and quality. I can't speak to the glass comparison, I havent looked through an XTRII in a while. Maybe its nicer glass. But the Meopta seems like good value for its price. Certainly better than some other optics I've seen in that price range. I would buy it all day over the Vortex offerings in that price.
No I wouldn't say so.Isn't it normal or expected for overly expensive European made optics to need occasional factory service from time to time?
Just like if you bought a Ferrari or Lamborghini that needs (or requires) routine factory servicing a lot more than a Toyota?
Yep the S&B 3-27x56 sure was sucky and I no longer buy S&B.No I wouldn't say so.
But we're talking about different issues in each scope. Some mechanical, some are optical anomalies, some are basically head scratching things that one wouldn't think a expensive scope should exhibit at the beginning of ownership or after a few years use. I mean heck what are we paying the big bucks for then.
A perfect example could be a S$B PM2 3-27x56. I haven't owned one but I remember I wasn't impressed about the IQ when I looked through it and as the years went by it turns out I wasn't wrong when reading others commenting on it. That was when this scope was the new thing and the guy had paid top dollar for it. Back then I paid $3850 for my 5-25 PM2 and he paid much more for his 3-27. It's a case of a scope designed to do too much so it has optical compromises. Not unlike some March scopes.
And actually one of my PM2 5-25's had a parallax knob that had low enough tension that it needed to be refocused every 3-4 shots.
I had to send my PM2 3-20 back twice because the elevation turret lost its clicks.
The list goes on with the other brands of higher dollar scopes I bought.
Shouldn't be but it is.
I have a Cronus BTR Gen 2 4.5-29x56 as well as a Meopta 3-18x50. Different mag ranges yes but optically the Meopta is every bit as good if not a bit brighter even at the same mag ratio. The Cronus, which is twice the cost, is more compact and ergonomically is a bit better. The turrets are hellish tight though and I actually prefer the Meopta turrets in some ways though they're tall/large. The Cronus is marked better and it's easier for me to read. Reticle wise, I've taken more to the Meopta's MRAD1 RD. I enjoy shooting through the Meopta more.Or they just have better glass and better reticles. I'd buy an Athlon Cronus over the Meopta, better glass IMO and I prefer the reticles.
Having had my Optica 6/ 5-30 for 7 months now, I still rate the glass as above average for the price, other controls are fine 'except turrets', and turrets are falling back a step or two compared to my Cronus G2's, Athlon ETR, Midas TAC, and even Helos G2's.
Meopta, essentially you pay for the IQ or maybe the reticle if one is your favorite.
I'm still not satisfied with three non Athlon brand scopes I've tried the previous two years. A Vector Continental 5-30/lower quality overall, a Vortex Razor LHT 4.5-22/poor value, and this Meopta/decent value for the $699 I paid. That's a $3000 street price test I did to find out some things I was wondering about.
Even though I feel the IQ is better in the Meopta than the mentioned scopes "except for the ETR 15-60 which as nice or nicer" I can't abide lackluster turrets and certainly won't rate it as high as the Cronus G2 as far as controls but especially turrets.
I paid $800 for the Vector at a discount because I like the reticle but it doesn't hold zero anymore so needs to go back under warranty, has unimpressive glass, and to me the turrets are halfway decent at best.
The "Razor" LHT, Vortex, should be ashamed of. Glass is decent, lightweight, has daylight bright illume but a $2000 MSRP scope, no way?! Turrets are below par. I paid $1160 new so I'm not totally distraught but to me it's more in line with a scope priced 20% less than I bought it for.
For the street price of $1100 or so I have to give the Cronus G2 the thumbs up as #1 for the money. Everything is heavy duty feeling, best turrets out there in this price range, daylight bright illume, great reticles, compact, and decent IQ.
This Randy fella has been fuckstarting years old threads most of the day and filling them with shit.While Meopta "features" aren't the latest greatest their glass is superior to many scopes priced higher because of the reticle/turrets etc. which I get.
I have an older ZD 4-16 that while older Euro tech it performs well. Bino's are very good I have 2 mid range models and many consider them comparable to many of the high end way more pricey choices and my take is it's a brand chasing exercise not a true comparison of glass. YMMV