Yes it does come out of my pocket, and your pocket and everyone else's with the cost of goods. Who do you think absorbs those cost increases, or taxes, or tariffs? I'm not genius, but I understand the companies are not cutting into their own profits to pay workers more money. I'm sure you bitch and complain about the costs of everything you buy unless you are wealthier than most and can absorb said rising costs. Or are you one of those people shouting tax the rich and they need to pay their fair share? Simple economics at play here.
Since I actually live here (SoCal about 20 miles south of Long Beach) I know the cost of housing, gas, utilities, food etc. So yes I understand what wages are and how much a job should pay for the work involved. Negotiating your own personal pay is very different than a union. The union is collecting dues from the people in said union. I'm sure its a percentage and not a flat monthly fee, or that monthly fee is based on percentages. They make more when their "workers" make more. I am not anti union but we have to be realistic and think logically.
I am not opposed to the workers getting wage increases either. So tell me why would you need a 77% increase in your pay over 5 years if the standard cost of living increase (non Biden inflation) was 2.7-3ish% per year? 6 years = 77% inflation? And 77% on top of the already high wage per hour and OT? Help me understand the math here. I suck at math but I can figure this out. I understand it compounds but not 77% worth.
And also most items coming into ports are from places outside the country. So that money already departed the country. Most things inside the country are transported by rail or truck. It's faster and more efficient/cost effective than going by boat. A lot of the transport freighters are owned/operated by foreign crews and countries. Once again money leaving the country. So please stop using that as your argument.