Federal does it again 😅

Strange? It was there this morning. They are discussing it on the FB group too.

Looks like they pulled the PH2 and the Gen 1 Element since this morning too.

IMG_6446.jpeg

IMG_6445.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: LRRPF52 and Darryle
80k psi and the velocities

If they’re serious about this, Fedeeal will produce standard ammo (brass cases @ 60k psi) that will probably perform nearly identically as the 280ai, including barrel life
Unpopular opinion: After running the 280AI I am not big on the 40° shoulder.
 
Recoil is simple math, energy forward equals energy rearward, after that it's just about masses. The only ways to makes a gun kick less shooting the same bullet at the same speed is to make the gun heavier or add a compensator.

In that simple math on every recoil calculator I’ve seen there is a place to enter powder weight. Because powder has mass too and said mass goes forward out the barrel with the bullet so there is recoil energy going back for it as well.

So if a bullet has identical velocity in 2 guns but one does it with more slow burning powder at 60k PSI and the other does it with less powder at 80k psi, the one burning less powder has less recoil energy cuz newtons law and stuff.
 
Last edited:
this will literally wind up just like the 6.8 western. neat well performing cartridge with no support and too late in the game.
if its a rebated rim to get more powder in and get better velocity than a 7mm-08 or 7 saw etc. it may hang around a bit but the market just feels flooded nowadays and not enough components to go support it all and still way more expensive than pre covid plandimic
 
this will literally wind up just like the 6.8 western. neat well performing cartridge with no support and too late in the game.
if its a rebated rim to get more powder in and get better velocity than a 7mm-08 or 7 saw etc. it may hang around a bit but the market just feels flooded nowadays and not enough components to go support it all and still way more expensive than pre covid plandimic
Agreed. There are so many 7’s that perform very similarly, in the market today. While I think a bunch of them are cool as shit, I’m not going to spend the time and money to invest in one for only one barrel. Especially when my current stable of calibers meets performance expectations for what I do with them.

The main benefit, for me personally, is watching Federal give Sig the big 🖕on their own idea. For that alone, I hope it takes off.
 
Unpopular opinion: After running the 280AI I am not big on the 40° shoulder.
What didn't you like about the 40° shoulder ? I load a 280AI for a friend and shoot a 243AI myself. My 243AI feeds from an mdt mag with greyboe bottom metal fitted in the factory laminate stock just fine also. Friends rifle is still a BDL but no problems feeding there either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FuhQ
2850 with a 195 Berger out of a 20 inch barrel is nothing to sneeze at especially, out of an 06 sized case. This cartridge is really only useful for hunters but if it can be reloaded relatively easily I could see it having some success. One thing to think about with this tech is increased performance in other cartridges. Think of a 338 norma pushing into 33xc performance territory. Could be fun.
 
Last edited:
80k psi and the velocities

If they’re serious about this, Fedeeal will produce standard ammo (brass cases @ 60k psi) that will probably perform nearly identically as the 280ai, including barrel life
It may just be that simple or it may be more complicated. If the 280ai case size is accurate here, with a heavy bullet, we're talking 55-60gr of usable capacity. Similar velocity 28 nosler load and we're using 80'ish grains. That's a 20-25gr difference in powder charge. Thats a significant amount of additional material to be burned. Assuming the 7mm backcountry is using a much faster burning powder (that doesnt mean higher temperatures), the burn time and pressure is generated in much less time than say the 28 nosler... the barrel is exposed to the high temps for less time with each firing. What effect that has on the barrel I'm not certain but I would assume it to be positive for barrel wear.

I think there's something going on with the higher pressures and increased efficiency. Plenty of examples where increased pressure results in increased efficiency. Google "explosive pressure VS efficiency"... ai does a decent job summarizing some of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LRRPF52 and Yoteski
What didn't you like about the 40° shoulder ? I load a 280AI for a friend and shoot a 243AI myself. My 243AI feeds from an mdt mag with greyboe bottom metal fitted in the factory laminate stock just fine also. Friends rifle is still a BDL but no problems feeding there either.
Well this was just my personal preference but I did not come away from the 280AI project happy. I was all in at first.

One problem I had was constant pressure spike issues. I really felt the 40° shoulder contributed, if not outright caused this. I found sizing a consistent shoulder bump more difficult as well as measuring it. The SAC comparator helped immensely.

I began to feel like the 40° shoulder was simply means to an end but an imperfect solution. I think in the old days it made more sense to improve an existing cartrige.

Today I think there are plenty of good options that don’t require “bastardizing” an existing cartridge design to get a few more ponies out of it.

Sometimes you get into something and in the end for whatever reasons it does not work out how you had hoped. You form some opinions based on empirical data and gut instincts. I did not work with a bunch of rifles and a bunch of different AI cartridges so I don’t think that my opinion is at all the gold standard, by any stretch.

I don’t hate AI cartridges. I just think that in the end they’re an imperfect workaround from the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XP1K and st1650

1000015894.png


Lots of common cartridges with ~1k barrel life, quite possibly not a problem for a hunting rifle, but TNSTAAFL.
 

View attachment 8585734

Lots of common cartridges with ~1k barrel life, quite possibly not a problem for a hunting rifle, but TNSTAAFL.
They're definitely not bragging about barrel life.
 
You know an ammunition manufacturer is out of touch with the shooting community when they insist on introducing new niche cartridges nobody asked for instead of just decided to manufacture factory 6 Dasher or 6 ARC ammo

Money money money! Is there motive I gotta think, which good night man just make money via volume of sells…. Focus on producing high selling calibers to be able to lower prices so more people are buying and shooting instead of always dreaming up niche cartridges no one really needs and end up with flops of new rifles chambered in them that will just turn into rebarrels or dust collectors..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6brshooter and FuhQ
In that simple math on every recoil calculator I’ve seen there is a place to enter powder weight. Because powder has mass too and said mass goes forward out the barrel with the bullet so there is recoil energy going back for it as well.

So if a bullet has identical velocity in 2 guns but one does it with more slow burning powder at 60k PSI and the other does it with less powder at 80k psi, the one burning less powder has less recoil energy cuz newtons law and stuff.

Yes, because acceleration rate means nothing to peak recoil impulse :unsure:
 
If you're willing to run a long action for hunting, it won't matter if it's a standard or a magnum bolt face. And while it's true there are a few hunters out there who take shots beyond 300 yards, most of those that do prefer reloads. And since I can reload, I can neck down the 300 win mag, or the 300 PRC to 7mm and get the same velocity out of cartridges I can easily reload and get components for. Not to mention the 7mm RUM. For me, I'll stick with the 7mm Rem Mag
 
Meh. It's a steel cased, necked down 30-06 with a 30* shoulder. Gross. Wen 7mm BCAI?

Also, they say it gets comparable barrel life to other magnum. It looks like less powder capacity than a 280 AI but running at 80kpsi? I guess we will see on that.

Reloading will probably be hard on dies and presses.

I guess maybe the skinnier cartridge will mean maybe another round in the mag compared to PRC, but imo, it's not offering anything I really want. The 7mm PRC is already plenty of thump and the 7 RUM already exists if a person needed more.
 
I can't see this taking off.

Too much trade offs to get to the same level as others that are already commercially available.

The only benefit is you get .532 BF performance in a .478 BF, but you get to keep the .532 BF barrel and throat wear. Weight of ammo loadout will likely be similar so not shedding much, if any weight. Recoil might be a little less due to reduced powder capacity, I'd bet the actual felt recoil is so similar nobody would be able to shoot one effectively but not the other especially once a brake or supressor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FuhQ
There’s already 6 gorillions variants of the 7mm
7mm-08
7SAW
7SS
280ai
284win
7WSM
7SAUM
7-6.5PRC
7PRC
7Rem mag
28 nosler
7STW

Yeah no let’s bring another one. It’s not like there’s already a component shortage …let’s start another production run for a dozen of fudds and magazine writers - it worked so well with the 6.8 western.

If you’re gonna sell your own line of +p steel cased precision ammo, why advertise a 200fps increase over the Hornady loads for 7PRC or Remmag ? Then get the shills in the magazine to write about the extra killing power or how they can now increase their ethical hunting range another 200 yards because muh velocity.
That is alot of 7 stuff ,is it more than the 6 mm selections out there ?
 
It is interesting that Glen Seekins speaks about his feeling that “the industry” is headed for “higher pressure cartridges”. I feel like he’s talking specifically to the fury and backcountry cartridges.

Video link starts at that point.

The question is what is the trade for this higher pressure ammo.
  • Hard, impractical or impossible to reload cases
  • Shorter barrel life
  • More recoil?
  • What else?
I‘m not sure that “the industry” doesn’t benefit from a couple of these. Boxed ammo has to be more profitable than components.

Glen is mitigating barrel-burn somewhat, with his switch barrel rifles

 
It is interesting that Glen Seekins speaks about his feeling that “the industry” is headed for “higher pressure cartridges”. I feel like he’s talking specifically to the fury and backcountry cartridges.

Video link starts at that point.

The question is what is the trade for this higher pressure ammo.
  • Hard, impractical or impossible to reload cases
  • Shorter barrel life
  • More recoil?
  • What else?
I‘m not sure that “the industry” doesn’t benefit from a couple of these. Boxed ammo has to be more profitable than components.

Glen is mitigating barrel-burn somewhat, with his switch barrel rifles


I submit it is in the interests of “The Industry” to push towards new high pressure cartridges so everyone has to buy everything over again and those things bought will wear out more often thus forcing more purchases.

At the end of the day all of these supposedly “Good Dudes” exist first and foremost to separate us from our money.

As such, invent a problem and sell us the solution.

And, of course, the solution is always more “stuff” and not more training or experience…

-Stan
 
Last edited:
I'd like 308win "steel" cases so I could load 185gr juggs@2800fps for use in a retuned MG3@1300rpm..😎
Many years ago we got 1500rpm out of a tuned MG42 in 8x57 with steel cased 186gr ammo.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: TonyTheTiger
80k psi and the velocities

If they’re serious about this, Fedeeal will produce standard ammo (brass cases @ 60k psi) that will probably perform nearly identically as the 280ai, including barrel life
And then people will ask themselves, and rightly so, why bother with a 7 BC when I already have a 280AI with enough parts and pieces to work on it immediately or already working on it.

I disclose my bias. I have 7 PRC and I like what it does but also totally understand why guys with 7 RM pushing 140 gr don't need more than that. And I have seen an elk get really dead from 7 RM.
 
You're right, not magnum BF. Also I agree on you with the limited positives, sig tried the steel case head with the 277 fury and nobody wanted it.
The US military is still using them... I buy em by the thousands. The 6.8 X51 hybrid can be reloaded, and used in a variety of 308 case head cartridges, 6 5 CM 308, 8.6 blkout, 358 win, are a few I utilize the case for.
I'm running stainless steel hybrid cases in variety of calbers. One can run 155 gr match at 3100 fps or 168 gr at 2940 fps in a 22" 9 twist barrel 308 with these cases.
A longer barrel and the 308 will run 200gr SMK at 2900 fps.
6.5 CM 140 grs at 3140 fps

Running high pressure cases has been around for years, good to see a major player like Federal getting into the mix with their new product.
Standard cartridges get near magnum performance in these cases.
And new powders to take advantage of the new high pressure loadings, would also be nice.
 

Attachments

  • 20231128_030316.jpg
    20231128_030316.jpg
    424.7 KB · Views: 88
  • 20250101_192215.jpg
    20250101_192215.jpg
    727 KB · Views: 85


interesting. he says he's getting same speeds with the 16 inch 7BC as he is with the 26 in 7 PRC

That's why I call him "HACKfire"... That's a complete load of shit, unless he's downloading his 7 PRC on purpose to shill the 7 Brokeback Country with his claims. Because I remember seeing folks pushing a 24" 7 PRC with a 195 around 3,000 FPS...

Also, I have 7mm-08's, 7mm SAW, .280 AI, 7mmRM's, 7mm STW, and even at one point a 7 RUM... With combined thousands upon thousands of rounds downrange, and load development with different bullets and powders, primers, brass brands, etc... Needless to say, I love 7mm's. But that dude is full of shit as a Christmas turkey.
 
That's why I call him "HACKfire"... That's a complete load of shit, unless he's downloading his 7 PRC on purpose to shill the 7 Brokeback Country with his claims. Because I remember seeing folks pushing a 24" 7 PRC with a 195 around 3,000 FPS...

Also, I have 7mm-08's, 7mm SAW, .280 AI, 7mmRM's, 7mm STW, and even at one point a 7 RUM... With combined thousands upon thousands of rounds downrange, and load development with different bullets and powders, primers, brass brands, etc... Needless to say, I love 7mm's. But that dude is full of shit as a Christmas turkey.

Appears to be factory ammo vs factory ammo amigo. Plenty of reports of factory 7 PRC ammo putting up the numbers he posted. Federal 7 prc seems to be a little faster on recent lots than hornady both with 175 eldx.

But yeah, that’s about what I ran that bullet at from 22” 7 saums.