Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are you paying per round for factory loaded and where are you getting it?Hornady 109 factory ammo is getting me top 10 finishes and production wins. I love not having to deal with sitting at the reloading bench. The amount of time saved is incredible. I don’t even need to pick up my brass anymore on stages.
I know this is a reloading thread but I thought it may be valuable to anyone who is on the fence and feels like they need to reload.
This stuff rocks.
9.3 SD were the first 5 rounds out of the rifle.
The other image was round 175-179 after the final PRS stage for the day.
nearly a carbon copy of mine when I started.Bartlein 7 twist 26”
Virgin Alpha OCD
Varget
105 hybrid
60 thou jump
CCI 400
Rounds 11-30 out of new barrel
$1.86/rdWhat are you paying per round for factory loaded and where are you getting it?
I got 15 firings from the Hornady brass before slight case head separations occurred on 7 out of 100.Alpha vs Hdy: Depends on how you define "better". My GT shoots under 1/2 MOA all day long with new Hornady brass. I run 34.4 gr of Varget behind 109 LRHTs and the cases handle the pressure just fine - even on really hot days. For me, the only way Alpha brass would be 50% better is it gave me 50% more loadings. I'm a ways off from finding out how many I can get out of the Hornady brass.
My first load with 109’s was 33.8. Switched to a new lot of Varget and warmer temps and mine started doing the same. Velocity was 2952 fps. I dropped down to the lower node of 32.6. Velocity is only 2850 now but it shoots really well and don’t have to worry about over pressure anymore.34.0 gr Varget, Berger 109 @3000 fps. No heavy bolt lift. Back off on charge or keep sending?
Thanks
View attachment 7903403View attachment 7903404View attachment 7903405
I’m no mathmatologist so could someone explain what it means when the line thingy goes more sideways than up in one of these? There’s been a few now. Not gonna lie I didn’t know how to do it until I saw the unknown munitions one a couple posts before.
I like that there are still some guys involved with this shit who are having fun and don't take this shit too seriously.
View attachment 7932471
~2860fps has worked great for me on the last 4 barrels with H4250 and 109s.George to the rescue!
Speaking of 6GT, I'm just about ready to prime and charge 500 cases...
H4350 and Hornady brass, was @ 34.5 grains and typical velocity of 2700. Maybe I'll bump it up to 35.5 - 36 grains. Thoughts?
George to the rescue!
Speaking of 6GT, I'm just about ready to prime and charge 500 cases...
H4350 and Hornady brass, was @ 34.5 grains and typical velocity of 2700. Maybe I'll bump it up to 35.5 - 36 grains. Thoughts?
I hope you have good results. That combo was stupid accurate and consistent for me. But slowI decided I'll see what happens with SW Precision Rifle + 112gr Match Burners in the 6GT...
I probably overpaid for the Shooter's World stuff, but finding it in-stock at Midsouth and not having to be on the seemingly endless treasure hunt for Varget does have a certain worth IMO lol. According to the John Snow article a while back, the cartridge was loosely designed around playing nice with Varget and that type of faster burn rate, so I'm curious about all that. This will be new to me since the fastest stuff I'm familiar with is H4350/RL16/Staball, but seems like loading for anything that takes Varget is a piece of cake from what guys yap about...
I went with the 112MB's simply because I've shot a boatload of them at this point and they've been great, not to mention getting a ~.305 G7 for ~$0.27 a pull. I originally bought a bunch because that's all I could find and the numbers looked like a good substitute for DTAC's (when they became unavailable/unattainable), and they've been a legit stand-in for those. I'm not going to say they're as good as Berger 109HT's or A-tips, but they're a hell of a lot better than most guys think, certainly not half as good while costing half as much. (FWIW I jump the hell out of them, 0.100" off is my go-to, I've never shot them any closer than 0.060" off.)
I'm planning to save the 6GT barrel until my current 6CM barrel is shot out, but depending on how things go this winter, who knows... Staball has been no problem for me in temps above 60degF, but in the colder months, I've had a couple of days/matches where my dope was fucked up until the temps warmed up and/or I figured it out so IDK.
I hope you have good results. That combo was stupid accurate and consistent for me. But slow
Define slow.I hope you have good results. That combo was stupid accurate and consistent for me. But slow
I’d have to go back and look(haven ran that combo in awhile). But I wanna say low 2700sDefine slow.
Where did you max out?
I’d have to go back and look(haven ran that combo in awhile). But I wanna say low 2700s
Looks like I was wrong on my velocity. I can’t find my hard data. But I have 2807 listed on two different ballistic calculators+1, if you think to check your notes let us know..? ...low 2700's does sound slow...
Hodgdon shows max at 2880fps for a 110 A-tip + 34.2gr Varget (closest combo I could find)... weird.
Honestly though, if it's accurate and the barrel makes it ~2300 (hopefully more), I'll be happy running it like a slower Dasher. I've already sort of been doing the same thing in 6CM, running that like a warm Dasher, 2900ish or under, and it's been great like that.
I was planning on loading up the first 100rds at 33gr + .100" off, maybe go up a grain or 2 depending on what it nets me or if I still think it's speeding up for the next 200, maybe play with jump as I go through them 50 at a time, and hopefully end up with a load that works and a barrel that's settled in speed-wise all by the end of the first firing on 300 cases.
Gotcha. I've heard mixed results on it. A few others report the same issue, others, same ingredients, but all the speed and a near carbon copy to Varget performance..... Have used that powder in several other cartridges but yet to try in 6GT.I’d have to go back and look(haven ran that combo in awhile). But I wanna say low 2700s
It was also a brand new barrel when I was using this combo. First 300 rounds.Gotcha. I've heard mixed results on it. A few others report the same issue, others, same ingredients, but all the speed and a near carbon copy to Varget performance..... Have used that powder in several other cartridges but yet to try in 6GT.
Looks like they’re having wet dreams!So do you fellas think my bullets are asleep or whatever?
Alright brotatochips. Had to “qualify” the new rifle for the 1000 yard range per our range rules. Sub MOA 5 shot group is all you need. Then trued out the load in the kestrel and it said MV:2898 labradar said the 20 shot SD was 5.2. So do you fellas think my bullets are asleep or whatever?
Anyone got load data for the 6GT with lighter bullets - somewhere around 70g grains? I know thats not really the intended use of the gay tiger, but I have a lot of 6mm bullets around the 70 grain weight, and I am thinking I will use them to shoot 100 yard drills to save my supply of 100gn + weight bullets.
36 gr of 4350 and 108s or 109s gets me right at 2900.Loaded up some H4350 36.5 grains with SMK 107s. Tried them in 3 different 6mm GT rifles yesterday. Average velocity was about 2860, thought this would have gotten me to 2900+. Two of the rifles did better then the 35 grains I tried last week. Everything shot from bipod on a bench and warmed up with the 35 grain load first. Here's some of the results.
Oddy enough, my Curtis Valor Preferred the 35 grain loading, which was about 2760.
View attachment 7941399
The rest of these are all from 36.5 grains.
View attachment 7941400
View attachment 7941401
View attachment 7941404
View attachment 7941405
Pulled this one a bit..
View attachment 7941409
Loaded up some H4350 36.5 grains with SMK 107s. Tried them in 3 different 6mm GT rifles yesterday. Average velocity was about 2860, thought this would have gotten me to 2900+. Two of the rifles did better then the 35 grains I tried last week. Everything shot from bipod on a bench and warmed up with the 35 grain load first. Here's some of the results.
Oddy enough, my Curtis Valor Preferred the 35 grain loading, which was about 2760.
View attachment 7941399
The rest of these are all from 36.5 grains.
View attachment 7941400
View attachment 7941401
View attachment 7941404
View attachment 7941405
Pulled this one a bit..
View attachment 7941409
But a rifle that don't shoot small at 100, isn't going to magically shoot small further out. A gun that's 1/3 moa at 100y with ES in the teens, should be a half moa gun at 700y. I have done it multiple ways, 500y ladders to find velocity nodes, the testing seating depth at 400y(perfect weather is required) then I've done strictly 100y load development using a barrel tuner. 800y groups on paper were consistently similar with both methods. This was with similar cartridges, 6gt and 6bra.~1" or less at 200 yards isn't too bad, and it's cool that you're shooting those groups at 200... because I feel like way too many guys spend too much time and energy dicking around at just 100 when we're supposed to be building these things for going much further out.
Hogdon shows more like 38gr for 2900fps (with a wonky 24" 7.7T of course), so your speed isn't far off... maybe see if you can get some "free speed" from a little more neck tension, if you even need it (might be fast enough), IDK?
View attachment 7941447
But a rifle that don't shoot small at 100, isn't going to magically shoot small further out. A gun that's 1/3 moa at 100y with ES in the teens, should be a half moa gun at 700y. I have done it multiple ways, 500y ladders to find velocity nodes, the testing seating depth at 400y(perfect weather is required) then I've done strictly 100y load development using a barrel tuner. 800y groups on paper were consistently similar with both methods. This was with similar cartridges, 6gt and 6bra.
I don't think 100yrd groups are useless or anything, I mean "cone of fire" is a thing lol. I guess I'm just of the opinion that many guys spend far too much time on them while ignoring that the human pulling the trigger more than likely has more influence over the results than anything in their load recipe.
In a perfect world we'd all have ransom rests at our clubs that we could lock our guns into in order to take the human out of the equation... but short of that, one's performance pulling the trigger and whether or not they "shot well" (and, to an extent, the weather conditions) always corrupts the results.
To each his own, there's no wrong way as long as one is honest with themselves about how much the group size has to do with them vs the load.
For me, I kind of suck at shooting groups (and am not too interested in burning up my components getting better at it), so once I think I have something that looks promising... I use a little IPSC at 750yrds to tell me if I'm full of shit or not lol:
View attachment 7945913View attachment 7945914