First off, thanks for reading through everything. I wonder if it was as painful for you as it was for me?
I am still indeed curious how much nicer the ZCO's features are compared to say a Razor. I've just been trying to gauge how noticeable the difference would be evident to me [which I know is impossible without spending time behind these scopes in question]. But I thought maybe if I was able to conversate amoungst enough people with an array of experiences I'd be able to feel out how noticeable the perceived improvements were amidst many of these popular scope models.
All along I was likely going to spend at least $2000 on a scope.
I knew what features I wanted, but I didn't want to make a "What scope should I get thread?" I wanted to start a natural conversation.
I've shot Viper PST's all the way up to the mighty Razor. I've had enough experience behind NXS's and ATACR's to know how tank like they are. I have experience behind nice German glass from Steiner to Zeiss, and even a little bit of time on a S&B. I know enough to know what I like and dislike about the aforementioned. But even so, I don't have more than a few dozen shots through $2500+ glass, and was hoping to glean some wisdom from some of the members without having to track down every comment on this forum about if people think that scope X is worth the squeeze.
The MPCT-3 reticle has seduced me though. Having Jeff standing behind the construction of the ZCO's is comforting. And the reports on how nice the glass is tickles my fancy. I ended getting in line for $3300. Still a lot, but a deal on the particular product none the less.
Only trigger time will tell if it's what I hope though. We'll see next month when it comes in.
Cheers!