Is Accurate 4064 the same as IMR4064?Of the ones you list, my picks for gas 308 would be IMR 4064, AR Comp, H4895, and XBR in no particular order.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is Accurate 4064 the same as IMR4064?Of the ones you list, my picks for gas 308 would be IMR 4064, AR Comp, H4895, and XBR in no particular order.
NO.Is Accurate 4064 the same as IMR4064?
Also , if you want go to compare the two 4064's as well as the other AA powders suitable for the 308 against the IMR powders go to the Hodgdon site and compare the different powders with the same Wt. bullets.NO.
Maybe close in burn rate but not the same. Western Powders has a free downloadable reloading manual for their powders.
Mike
Yes, I'm aware of the online reloading data. I was simply asking based on the numbers for the product.NO.
Maybe close in burn rate but not the same. Western Powders has a free downloadable reloading manual for their powders.
Mike
I'm not looking for a way to spend MORE money. So buying powder for a scientific experiment is not partAlso , if you want go to compare the two 4064's as well as the other AA powders suitable for the 308 against the IMR powders go to the Hodgdon site and compare the different powders with the same Wt. bullets.
2.905" OAL was touching the lands last time I checked. So right now my jump is around .035" So I will definitely start moving back in .003 increments and see if it starts to behave better.So I had similar accuracy with cfe223 in 308. Aproxamatly one moa to 1 1/8 was best I could get. It's a viable option.
First tests with varget went below one moa.
Since you started at max coal I would start backing it down 0.003 thousands at a time.
That stringing is probably barrel harmonics.
When I do death depth tests at 3 thousands I can watch scatter, vertical and horizontal stringing.
Eventually the group will find a round spot and 168 smk has no problem with a jump.
I think most of my Sierra bullets are jumping 0.040 range.
Well, I tried it. Backed off from the 2.246" CBTO in .003" increments. Problem was that I only had 18 pieces of brass prepped. So I did 6 groups of 3.I know 0.003 seating depth change sounds ridiculous for an ar but I have started to do all my testing with 3 shots.
It saves on time and supplies.
I tried hundreds of cfe rounds to get to the near moa load and could not better it. But I think you can round out that string.
It is now my backup load if varget runs out.
Good luck .
BUT , I asked about his Hornady 178 ELD loadsJust duplicate M118LR factory loads
IMR 4064 @ 41.8 with 175 MK
42.8 with 168 MK
Fed 210M primer in LC LR cases
NoIs Accurate 4064 the same as IMR4064?
Oal was 2.863 ish on all the 178 ELD loads. Bto was 2.230. Fc-308 brass, range pick ups. Using a modified pro mag that I can load to 2.870. Going to toy with seating depth next.I see an OAL of 2.588 with the 178 ELD's , is that correct , what magazines and how much of a compressed load is is the 43.6 of I 4064 ? Did I miss what AR you are using ?
1.796” spread @ 200 yds.
20” Ruger SFAR using FGMM 168gr SMK BTHP.
Only 175gr. Not 168gr. Open one up. It’s proprietary blendNo
Federal Gold Match and M118LR use IMR 4064 and Fed 210M primers with Sierra MK.
The old M852 used IMR 4895.
Federal Gold Medal uses IMR 4064 in both 168gr and 175 MK loading the same as the military loaded M118LR which is also loaded by Federal .Only 175gr. Not 168gr. Open one up. It’s proprietary blend
No sir. It’s proprietary. Pull one. You’ll see it’s not all 4064 in it. Long grain, medium grain and almost ballFederal Gold Medal uses IMR 4064 in both 168gr and 175 MK loading the same as the military loaded M118LR which is also loaded by Federal .
Yes the old M852 load used IMR 4985 as well as M72 30-06 match of the past. The military dropped the 168gr load years ago to go only with the 175gr M118LR in the 308 Win.
In my 308 Win I still like the load before IMR 4064 which was Reloader 15 and I like 45.0 with 165gr. Still a Reloader 15 Fan but maybe too hot for AR platform.
How many do you have? If plenty? Then load develop them. If not? Go with 42.5 gr 4064 and send emI have some black tip AP bullets that I would like to load into some LC 7.62x51 cases. Does anyone have load data for this?
I only have 8 of them, so thanks for the infoHow many do you have? If plenty? Then load develop them. If not? Go with 42.5 gr 4064 and send em
Open up a 168gr FGMM. It is not strictly 4064. Maybe 15 yrs ago? But I bought a new box and it certainly wasn’t. It’s a mix of almost ball, medium and long stick. And it’s not cause of the crushFederal Gold Medal uses IMR 4064 in both 168gr and 175 MK loading the same as the military loaded M118LR which is also loaded by Federal .
Yes the old M852 load used IMR 4985 as well as M72 30-06 match of the past. The military dropped the 168gr load years ago to go only with the 175gr M118LR in the 308 Win.
In my 308 Win I still like the load before IMR 4064 which was Reloader 15 and I like 45.0 with 165gr. Still a Reloader 15 Fan but maybe too hot for AR platform.
That is not M118 load data card. It is the newer, Navy Mk 316 MOD 0 using IMR 4064. The DODIC- AB39 is for that ammo. M118 was loaded with a couple of different powders over the years. The older M118 L/R load loaded with Reloader 15 and had pressure issues in the Desert. The DODIC for that load was AA11.
This was pointed out in another thread by j-dubya post # 16 : https://www.snipershide.com/shootin...n-military-7-62-m118lr.7169422/#post-10851392
Blow it up with your fingers to readI think I need glasses to read that tiny image.
Norma 203-B is the powder but is almost identical to Reloader 15 grain for grain and performance.I've used a fair amount of Re-15 in the 308. I will NEVER buy it again. I've tested 8208, AR Comp, H-4895 and Varget in my 4 308's, 2 gas guns and 2 bolt guns. Any of those are my preferred powder in the 308 with 155's, 168's and 175-8's. Re-15 is temp sensitive enough for me in my climate conditions to discontinue it's use. Re-15 is no less expensive than any of the powders I listed, so out it goes. I'll probably use the last 1.5#'s of it in some 223, 69-77 gr. loads.
I haven't tried the new Staball Match, don't know if I ever will since I bought many pounds of the listed powders before the last Covid crunch. I've probably got a decades worth.
I saw the new Re-15.5, but what I've read about it, It's not really suited for the 308 due to it being a bit slower than Re-15. Too bad Alliant didn't come out with a Re-13 or 14 in a less temp sensitive offering. I do remember using Re-12 many years ago in the 308, it was about the same a 4895, worked pretty good. Norma still makes it as N-202.
The new MK318 load from Federal that replaced the LC ATK RL 15 Alliant load was IMR 4064 @ 41.745 with Fed 210M primer and FC military brass documentation shows. 2.810”This has been discussed on here, and the links are in the other 308 section, and buried somewhere in reloading. FGMM has changed components now.
@918v will correct me if I'm wrong, and he'll be right.
43.2gr 4064 in FC/LC brass, length escapes me right now, but I'm about to load a bunch of this very recipe.
I use W748 with 165gr Fail Safe @ 45.0 in 308 win.My AR-10 load is my standard 308/168 match load, rumored to be a clone of the standard 168gr 308 FGMM.
I use Starline 308 brass, but most of the better 308 commercial brass is fine for this. I use a Large Rifle Match primer, BR-2, 210M, and even WLR.
The bullet is the Sierra 168gr SMK, but I substitute the Speer 168 Gold Dot Rifle because I find similar accuracy but actual intentional and excellent terminal performance. Max OAL I use is 2.815". My charge is 43.5gr of IMR-4064. My Mags are Magpul 7.62 NATO Gen-III'.
I am currently testing Once Fired IMI Semi-Auto Match brass. It is rumored to be superior to LC Match (and is crimped). I will occasionally use Hornady or Federal Premium, but generally, only for match usage on the first firing. Hornady because I keep hearing wails and moans from users on here (but no supporting evidence), Federal because of lingering memories of soft primer pockets, which may be from bygones past. I have also had very good consistent results from PPU.
I do full match prep, but only after fireforming and trimming. I use the Little Crow trimmer, RCBS Case Prep center, and RCBS Chargemaster Lite. Cartridges are loaded on an ancient (bought used in the early '90's) Dillon RL-500b, and a regular two die RCBS F/L die set.
I am currently considering switching propellants to W-748 because it is labelled as having a lower burn temperature, and 308 is just about my most frequently used chambering. IMR-8208XBR is also interesting; I'm already using it for 6.5 Grendel and mid-weight 223's (62's, 64's). TAC's another possibility/probability. So little time...
My rifle is a PSA PA-10 20" (experimentally reconfigured as a bag rider) and it's still in the break-in/load testing stage. I tried a brake, but the noise was intolerable. It's currently waiting on testing with a linear comp, to put the noise out front.
I don't really break in the barrels, it's the rest of the AR for me. In the end, though, the round count is the same, mainly because I'm fireforming the brass for true load development. I load a max of five loads, and don't anneal. Initial tests with the FGMM/Speer Clone were very accurate; I may skip the load testing.
Greg
I've used a fair amount of Re-15 in the 308. I will NEVER buy it again.
Anyone tried the new 6.5 staball match in .308? I bought some yesterday for a different project, but hope it's good for 308 because my "local" powder supplier has a bunch of it.
Yeah it’s not called 6.5 Staball Match. That’s 2 different powders.I think it's more like a h4350 type powder. There is another "STABALL" that is for 223 and 308.
You are correct. I was referring to staball match. From what I've read, it is supposed to be similar in burn rate to varget, which is my current "go-to" powder for 308. That stuff is like hen's teeth around here.Yeah it’s not called 6.5 Staball Match. That’s 2 different powders.
6.5 Staball is as you said closer to H4350.
Staball Match is what nchilbily was asking about & yes it works.
I haven’t formed an opinion yet. Shot 5 at 4 different charges with 168smk @2.8 from an 18” Proof 45.6 - 46.8. The top charge is book max & that book max was not at all conservative.
The best 5 shot 100y group was 46.4 @.700” speed on that was 2612. SD sucked but I think that was because I had 2 different Black Hills head stamps mixed together.
For reference I shot 5 factory loaded FGMM168 & they went 2516 SD 9.3 the wierd thing is that I have data from a different batch of 168 FGMM that was 2620 avg over 20 rounds. Tje was in this same barrel & only 60rounds prior to this.
So at min the Staball Match achieved the same velocity as the hotter factory loads.
I also tried 176 A-tips with Match at 45.6. Don’t do that! Way to hot. I’ll be trying it some more this weekend vs RL15.5 & Lever
You are correct. I was referring to staball match. From what I've read, it is supposed to be similar in burn rate to varget, which is my current "go-to" powder for 308. That stuff is like hen's teeth around here.
I’ve started working with AA2495 and 168 ELDMs. Looks very promising. Loaded 9 charge weights between 40.6-43.0. Only three shot groups, because I was just trying to eliminate bad loads and work from there. Seven of the nine were sub MOA. Five under 3/4 Moa. 41.5 is the first area I’ll be exploring. I’m expecting about 2580 from my 20” criterion barrel with that charge based on limited recoverable data from this trip. Between the bad sun angles, and low batteries in the chrono that day I had very few data points I trust. Fed brass, btw.Due to whatever reason , either cost or availability or just experimenting have any of us "gas gun" shooters tried any of the AA powders ; 2230,2460, 2495,2520,4064 ??
It seams I read here of a member saying that he had and that the AA powder he was using didn't preform well till he had reached the max or near max load. I've got an stock RRA with the heavy 26" barrel so that will be my test bed as time allows.
I've used 15.5 with 175 SMK's and getting 1MOA with it. 15.5 just likes a heavier bullet I think. 1 MOA is about the limit for the 20" Ballistics Advantage barrel. I just put on a new Krieger 24" and just waiting for a replacement barrel nut I managed to bugger up taking off the BA.I've used a fair amount of Re-15 in the 308. I will NEVER buy it again. I've tested 8208, AR Comp, H-4895 and Varget in my 4 308's, 2 gas guns and 2 bolt guns. Any of those are my preferred powder in the 308 with 155's, 168's and 175-8's. Re-15 is temp sensitive enough for me in my climate conditions to discontinue it's use. Re-15 is no less expensive than any of the powders I listed, so out it goes. I'll probably use the last 1.5#'s of it in some 223, 69-77 gr. loads.
I haven't tried the new Staball Match, don't know if I ever will since I bought many pounds of the listed powders before the last Covid crunch. I've probably got a decades worth.
I saw the new Re-15.5, but what I've read about it, It's not really suited for the 308 due to it being a bit slower than Re-15. Too bad Alliant didn't come out with a Re-13 or 14 in a less temp sensitive offering. I do remember using Re-12 many years ago in the 308, it was about the same a 4895, worked pretty good. Norma still makes it as N-202.