I was talking to a guy today at the range today and when I said I didn't believe in nodes I think he got offended.
He then said something to the effect of "you're wrong, yes, they exist" and then asked me "how do you explain it when something doesn't shoot then?"... and I said, "most of the time it's me, not the ammo, I don't think I've ever loaded a single batch that was ever bad enough to blame it all on".
The modern thinking is that if loads with small incremental changes in speed/depth appear drastically better than others in a similar range, it doesn't mean you've found a "node". It is more than likely just that you haven't shot enough rounds, and had a chance to observe a large enough sample size to see that they're actually performing relatively the same.
He then said something to the effect of "you're wrong, yes, they exist" and then asked me "how do you explain it when something doesn't shoot then?"... and I said, "most of the time it's me, not the ammo, I don't think I've ever loaded a single batch that was ever bad enough to blame it all on".
The modern thinking is that if loads with small incremental changes in speed/depth appear drastically better than others in a similar range, it doesn't mean you've found a "node". It is more than likely just that you haven't shot enough rounds, and had a chance to observe a large enough sample size to see that they're actually performing relatively the same.