Coup De Grâce, New Action from American Rifle Company, $899 WOW!

X-caliber barrels will cut a conical breech for an added fee. (According to the email I got only about $25 extra)
So we can add them to the list of places I've talked to that said they would do prefits, or ARC said they would do prefits, or ARC said they are trying to get to do prefits

x-caliber
PVA
Preferred barrels
LRI
Straight Jacket
Proof

Hoping other guys like carbon six, mcgowen, IBI do prefits too. I am not sure if NSS will do the conical breech. I can email james and ask.
 
Bugholes should have no issues doing them either, the 223 barrel I got from Greg for my 223 AIAX conversion uses a conical breech face and it was a prefit that I didn't have to send the action in for. Should be easy for him to chamber a CDG barrel.
 
So we can add them to the list of places I've talked to that said they would do prefits, or ARC said they would do prefits, or ARC said they are trying to get to do prefits

x-caliber
PVA
Preferred barrels
LRI
Straight Jacket
Proof

Hoping other guys like carbon six, mcgowen, IBI do prefits too. I am not sure if NSS will do the conical breech. I can email james and ask.
I would clarify whether Xcal does an actual ARC shouldered prefit or just cuts a conical face into a savage small threaded barrel which you would use a nut with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRSDietitian
So we can add them to the list of places I've talked to that said they would do prefits, or ARC said they would do prefits, or ARC said they are trying to get to do prefits

x-caliber
PVA
Preferred barrels
LRI
Straight Jacket
Proof

Hoping other guys like carbon six, mcgowen, IBI do prefits too. I am not sure if NSS will do the conical breech. I can email james and ask.
Not sure I would trust Mcgowen for prefits.
 
Screenshot_20230206_130238_Gmail.jpg
here is some clarification. For the X-caliber barrels. I Just asked about the Savage small shank prefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: evilsemaj
This has been nagging in the back of my head. I did a little ruff scaling from the sketch & come up with about .115" for how far the cone needs to extend down below the chamber to guide a .223 projectile in a 223 chamber. If my math is right then the tenon would need to be at least .067" longer than the std. .675" used for the flat breach.

What's bugging me is how will that clear the extractor & opposing lug nub/case support??? They stick out about .110" on a Nuke.
Almost seams like 223 would need a stepped cone breach?
View attachment 8067654
Your thinking of it wrong... the only thing that exstends past the flat bolt face appears to be the extractor....trust the guys making the action....they may have doen this once or twice. Also conned breaches are EASY, been done for decasdes on alomsot ALL BAT benchrest actions and EVERY Win. Model 70.
 
X-caliber barrels will cut a conical breech for an added fee. (According to the email I got only about $25 extra)

I would clarify whether Xcal does an actual ARC shouldered prefit or just cuts a conical face into a savage small threaded barrel which you would use a nut with.

That sounds good to me, I asked preferred about it but per their last email they were only doing full prefits for the CDG and not cutting the breech on savage prefits.

Scratch them off the list. $25 for a chamfer is even more ridiculous than $25 for an appropriate breech cone.

His email stated he would check with the foreman and it could be free not that it was definitely going to cost $25. Even if it was I’d still pay for it because it lets me continue to use my Barloc and is still substantially cheaper than a shouldered Barloc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diverdon
That sounds good to me, I asked preferred about it but per their last email they were only doing full prefits for the CDG and not cutting the breech on savage prefits.



His email stated he would check with the foreman and it could be free not that it was definitely going to cost $25. Even if it was I’d still pay for it because it lets me continue to use my Barloc and is still substantially cheaper than a shouldered Barloc.
It's all irrelevant if it's just a chamfer.
 
Will complete rifle packages be available? If so at what price point? Last week a friend of mine asked me what bolt action he should get and mentioned eventually getting a chassis. I doubt he'll spend the coin on a $4k+ full on custom build, but something near the Nucleus Gen2 rifle price point just may land you guys a sale.
And me a sale...
 
do we have an answer to how many will make the preorder sale, and what the price bump will be?
They don’t set aside a predetermined number of actions for the preorder. Usually they will open the preorder for a limited time (several weeks for example). You buy in, get on their list, and when your action is made you’ll receive it in the future based on order of where your name is on the list. Intro price usually is somewhere in the ballpark of couple of hundred off what ever they plan on offering the full retail price. I think my gen 1 nuke preorder was around $850? and retail is $999 so you get the jist of it.

They usually offer a decent Black Friday sale on actions so you don’t have to worry about fomo on the preorder. Honestly based on how the first nuke preorders went you might want to wait and see how things go anyways.
 
This has all the makings of a crashed website tomorrow!

Still not sure if the CDG is for me I guess. I know I want a .223 build but might make sense to grab a second Nuc instead for the CDG for barrel compatibility etc.

This seems like a great choice for AW-fed calibers…but I have a need for .223 sized stuff right now.

Is it gonna feed like poo with an AICS? Where do I get said spacer for AICS mags? Does the stock inlet need to be modified?
 
Last edited:
Definitely considering their hunter for an NRL hunter action too. I am considering the Ultimatum Defacto too because the price and IBI prefits for it are affordable but being boxed in to only IBI prefits is a little annoying
 
They don’t set aside a predetermined number of actions for the preorder. Usually they will open the preorder for a limited time (several weeks for example). You buy in, get on their list, and when your action is made you’ll receive it in the future based on order of where your name is on the list. Intro price usually is somewhere in the ballpark of couple of hundred off what ever they plan on offering the full retail price. I think my gen 1 nuke preorder was around $850? and retail is $999 so you get the jist of it.

They usually offer a decent Black Friday sale on actions so you don’t have to worry about fomo on the preorder. Honestly based on how the first nuke preorders went you might want to wait and see how things go anyways.


personally im going to wait until the second or third round, so the bugs are fixed by then


preorders are figured out before hand via batch size, ROI for cashflow

EX; batch size of 100 actions for 3 production cycles is the preorder qty etc

they aren't free for all's on inventory / production for a undetermined qty of goods

..unless they do financials on a yellow pad then all bets are off ... lol

excited to see these in some chassis though
 
personally im going to wait until the second or third round, so the bugs are fixed by then

Regarding bugs... I'm thinking the release of the CDG will be more like the Archimedes and not like the nucleus based on previous lessons learned from the nucleus rollout and subsequent revisions.

The nucleus went through a couple of revisions after the initial release based on user feedback... striker spring weight, bolt lug ramp geometry, bolt release style, etc. The Archimedes on the other hand was released in the same form it sells in today as far as I can tell. I have one pre order Archimedes and 2 more that were ordered a couple years later and they appear and feel identical. The Archimedes parts list has no part number splits based on generation or serial number. There may have been some process changes behind the scenes for production efficiencies, but nothing that resulted in changes requiring new part numbers or a "gen 2."

Not saying releasing the CDG into the wild might let the end users uncover some issues that Ted and crew didn't find and address during testing (I'm thinking we'll hear reports of mag and mag latch tweaks being needed for oddball calibers to feed reliably because of the 6 o'clock lug; no way can ARC test every caliber and bullet/oal combo for feeding) but I have a feeling the rollout of the CDG is going to go much more smoothly like the rollout of the Archimedes.