They mention long-term financial support as key!
*At least dude in the meme got some pussy before the ATM trip
*At least dude in the meme got some pussy before the ATM trip
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
those "chicks" probably have dicks. . .They mention long-term financial support as key!
*At least dude in the meme got some pussy before the ATM trip
gonna stick with my old fudd gun 300 win mag ,i forget the numbers but it makes things really deader plus the chicks really dig big man guns at the range
gee last year everyone was waving a uke flag and supporting those brave fighters who were bearing the brunt of those godless commies ....ya know the ones that every bomb/missile hit a baby milk factory/blind children hospital ,nuns retirement home ........what happened
71 and no children so i am off the hook
Its not that white people wont go to to the malls now its white people avoid going to the malls because they have been taken over as a hangout for the savages .....who spend little and steal much until the malls close foreverIt's kind of funny...white people don't even go to the mall anymore.
You know if we had a Covid 21 pandemic and our population went down to 20 million from 42...that would actually be good for the housing prices.
Its not that white people wont go to to the malls now its white people avoid going to the malls because they have been taken over as a hangout for the savages .....who spend little and steal much until the malls close forever
and our government used a c-17 and our taxes to bring him here.
and our government used a c-17 and our taxes to bring him here.
and our government used a c-17 and our taxes to bring him here.
Now watch for the shortage of ammunition here in the states. Along with that will be higher prices.Fuck this asshole. Take Brandon, and Kameltoe back with you. All first class shitheads.
War spending is about as inefficient as you get with spending tax payer $ , its just lots of $$ for an extremely narrow circlewe gotta admit to ourselves that war spending puts food on a shitload of tables in america...and that's why there is always one going on.
i wonder if zelensky is guilty of a fara violation.
Wilkerson: He was embarrassed. He was embarrassed by the fact — he was pulling out his maps with target data and Biden told him, “Don’t even pull them out. We’re not going to talk about that.”
I’ve been told, again by fairly reliable sources, that Blinkin and Sullivan — Blinkin primarily, but Sullivan too — have been sidetracked, and what’s happened is the Pentagon has taken over, essentially, diplomacy as well as any action, militarily speaking, with regard to both theaters of war.
And so they’re now in charge.
I have to change my evaluation of Secretary Austin if that’s the case, because it means he listened finally to the people in the bowels of the Pentagon who know the truth, and he’s reacting to that, and he’s told the President Biden that, and to Biden’s credit, even though he was furious, he finally took that advice.
Trump spent a lot on the military because 8 years under Obama damn near killed it. Depleted stocks, depleted ammo supplies, and money diverted to DES training instead of combat training. O killed the F22 production and damn near anything that was capable and top notch.we gotta admit to ourselves that war spending puts food on a shitload of tables in america...and that's why there is always one going on.
i'd guess that is why trump spent a lot on the military, rather than start more shit abroad.
i wonder if zelensky is guilty of a fara violation.
Excerpt from Reagan's January 1987 radio address to the nation.As under Reagan, Carter tried to kill the B1, minute man, and numerous other top notch weapons; Reagan brought the B1 back and paid for it under a 1 year budget so the Dems couldn't kill it the next year.
O killed the F22 production and damn near anything that was capable and top notch.
I was a little over a year into my term of service when he made that address.Excerpt from Reagan's January 1987 radio address to the nation.
Think back just 6 years: Our Navy had dwindled from more than 1,000 ships to less than 500. Many of our planes couldn't fly for lack of spare parts. And our men and women in uniform were seeing their pay in real terms shrink while pay in the private sector rose.
Well, I believed on first taking office, as I do today, that the defense of this Republic is not just one of the duties of the Federal Government, it is the first duty.
So, with bipartisan congressional support, we took action at once on the rebuilding of our nation's defenses. Since 1980 we've increased the number of Army divisions from 16 to 18. We've reactivated 4 battleships and purchased 124 new ships for the Navy, including 2 new aircraft carriers and 21 high-technology Aegis-class cruisers and destroyers. We've purchased over 2,500 new tactical fighter aircraft. And just as important, we've more than doubled our vital stocks of spare parts and munitions, stocks that were dangerously low in 1981.
Pay and benefits for our Armed Forces has increased substantially. And perhaps most heartening, the proportion of recruits holding high school diplomas has risen from less than 70 percent in 1980 to more than 90 percent today.
Especially when all the hard and expensive work was already complete and they just had to manufacture a heap of F-22s.That is going to be his biggest sin if we ever do end up at war with Russia or China.
The thinking during his administration (not just the administration, but Americans generally) was, hey, the Cold War is over, we do not need an air superiority fighter to fight with islamic fighters in plain clothes using AK-47s and IEDs.
It was a very short sighted decision, and now it is damn near impossible to appropriate the funding for a sufficient number of F22s.
But here is the thing: back then the debt to GDP was MUCH MUCH lower. We could afford to do that. Now the interest on the debt is higher than most other expenditures. The only way to get the military back to something it needs to be will be to print a lot more money, which only accelerates the overall issue and continues to increase taxes and inflation. There are two things that need to occur: quit fighting needless wars and cut WAY back handouts in the US, which does include Social Security, medicare and welfare. That still won't touch the overall debt to GDP problem with respect to interest payments.Excerpt from Reagan's January 1987 radio address to the nation.
Think back just 6 years: Our Navy had dwindled from more than 1,000 ships to less than 500. Many of our planes couldn't fly for lack of spare parts. And our men and women in uniform were seeing their pay in real terms shrink while pay in the private sector rose.
Well, I believed on first taking office, as I do today, that the defense of this Republic is not just one of the duties of the Federal Government, it is the first duty.
So, with bipartisan congressional support, we took action at once on the rebuilding of our nation's defenses. Since 1980 we've increased the number of Army divisions from 16 to 18. We've reactivated 4 battleships and purchased 124 new ships for the Navy, including 2 new aircraft carriers and 21 high-technology Aegis-class cruisers and destroyers. We've purchased over 2,500 new tactical fighter aircraft. And just as important, we've more than doubled our vital stocks of spare parts and munitions, stocks that were dangerously low in 1981.
Pay and benefits for our Armed Forces has increased substantially. And perhaps most heartening, the proportion of recruits holding high school diplomas has risen from less than 70 percent in 1980 to more than 90 percent today.
But here is the thing: back then the debt to GDP was MUCH MUCH lower. We could afford to do that. Now the interest on the debt is higher than most other expenditures. The only way to get the military back to something it needs to be will be to print a lot more money, which only accelerates the overall issue and continues to increase taxes and inflation. There are two things that need to occur: quit fighting needless wars and cut WAY back handouts in the US, which does include Social Security, medicare and welfare. That still won't touch the overall debt to GDP problem with respect to interest payments.
We are in a debt spiral. Spending will either get cut via austerity or bad things will happen. So eventually we will either cut back on military spending and reduce our empire or it will occur naturally (which will only be a symptom of the much bigger problem). This is why I keep saying that neither candidate can fix this problem. Its math. The rule of 72 trumps damn near everything eventually unless you go to a balanced budget which will never happen.
Watch and learn why you can't have nice things .Excerpt from Reagan's January 1987 radio address to the nation.
Think back just 6 years: Our Navy had dwindled from more than 1,000 ships to less than 500. Many of our planes couldn't fly for lack of spare parts. And our men and women in uniform were seeing their pay in real terms shrink while pay in the private sector rose.
Well, I believed on first taking office, as I do today, that the defense of this Republic is not just one of the duties of the Federal Government, it is the first duty.
So, with bipartisan congressional support, we took action at once on the rebuilding of our nation's defenses. Since 1980 we've increased the number of Army divisions from 16 to 18. We've reactivated 4 battleships and purchased 124 new ships for the Navy, including 2 new aircraft carriers and 21 high-technology Aegis-class cruisers and destroyers. We've purchased over 2,500 new tactical fighter aircraft. And just as important, we've more than doubled our vital stocks of spare parts and munitions, stocks that were dangerously low in 1981.
Pay and benefits for our Armed Forces has increased substantially. And perhaps most heartening, the proportion of recruits holding high school diplomas has risen from less than 70 percent in 1980 to more than 90 percent today.
Russia will be forced to use tactical nuclear weapons against NATO, says former Putin advisor in new interview
Due to continued Western military support, Russia will be forced to use tactical nuclear weapons, said political analyst Sergei Markov, a former advisor to Vladimir Putin, in an interview with Times Radio. Markov expressed concern about the role of the West in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict...rmx.news
not uncommon for "news" outlets to use stock photos that have no real association to the article.Interesting that the picture is all Specialists swearing an oath to Sgt, E-5. There are no "high level NCOs" in that picture.
But how would the "never served any where but McDonalds" main stream media even know enough to know that?
well, I know that the Dems are sitting on 42BILLION that was supposed to be for the internet, that STILL hasn't hooked up 1 person.But here is the thing: back then the debt to GDP was MUCH MUCH lower. We could afford to do that. Now the interest on the debt is higher than most other expenditures. The only way to get the military back to something it needs to be will be to print a lot more money, which only accelerates the overall issue and continues to increase taxes and inflation. There are two things that need to occur: quit fighting needless wars and cut WAY back handouts in the US, which does include Social Security, medicare and welfare. That still won't touch the overall debt to GDP problem with respect to interest payments.
We are in a debt spiral. Spending will either get cut via austerity or bad things will happen. So eventually we will either cut back on military spending and reduce our empire or it will occur naturally (which will only be a symptom of the much bigger problem). This is why I keep saying that neither candidate can fix this problem. Its math. The rule of 72 trumps damn near everything eventually unless you go to a balanced budget which will never happen.
"This is why I keep saying that neither candidate can fix this problem."But here is the thing: back then the debt to GDP was MUCH MUCH lower. We could afford to do that. Now the interest on the debt is higher than most other expenditures. The only way to get the military back to something it needs to be will be to print a lot more money, which only accelerates the overall issue and continues to increase taxes and inflation. There are two things that need to occur: quit fighting needless wars and cut WAY back handouts in the US, which does include Social Security, medicare and welfare. That still won't touch the overall debt to GDP problem with respect to interest payments.
We are in a debt spiral. Spending will either get cut via austerity or bad things will happen. So eventually we will either cut back on military spending and reduce our empire or it will occur naturally (which will only be a symptom of the much bigger problem). This is why I keep saying that neither candidate can fix this problem. Its math. The rule of 72 trumps damn near everything eventually unless you go to a balanced budget which will never happen.