Given my experience, I would say you are correct.That seems to be the moral of this thread, I would wager bonded bullets are for subs only
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Given my experience, I would say you are correct.That seems to be the moral of this thread, I would wager bonded bullets are for subs only
There are a couple of guys on the fb group that have had success with 185 bonded bullets. Is it possible that those are just crap bullets? Nosler partitions work at mild velocities, and those are soft points.Alright. I learned a hard lesson today. When Q says "only bonded and solid copper projectiles" they mean only solid copper.
I had some 185gr .338 federal fusion (bonded) loaded to very mild pressures, that came apart from the ultra fast twist and took out every single baffle, and the end cap, in my supressor.
Word of warning...test fire projectiles without supressors to verify they are staying together.
It is definitely possible. I am not a fan of anything Federal with the exception of their "Premium" line. These very well could be faulty.There are a couple of guys on the fb group that have had success with 185 bonded bullets. Is it possible that those are just crap bullets? Nosler partitions work at mild velocities, and those are soft points.
What were your charges on those CX roundsI just got back from a range session. The Hornady CX 185g shot quite nicely. Chrono indicated an average velocity of 2202 fps with a SD of 12 with a nice clustered 5 shot all touching. Sounded great through the can as well.
I also shot the Maker 350g subs and his published load data was right on the spot. They grouped nicely as well and they were super quiet.
Still waiting on my Barnes order to show up...
I went with 31.6 grains of Accurate 1680 at 2.6 COAL. I shot it again today and got similar speeds but an even better SD. I got 1 ragged hole for a 5 shot group.What were your charges on those CX rounds
I agree; I love having different screwdrivers in my toolbox, but that 1:3 twist is makes it a niche odd as hell tri wing screw head. Yes; counterproductive for any type commercial success as the bullet selection is limited in scope and manufacturers. A couple of threads here has proven that lead core bullets are not happy at 400-500K+ RPM’s.Maybe people will start to realize at some point that the 1:3 twist is silly and counterproductive.
What suppressor was nuked with the 185s?I have decided to get out of the 8.6 until more established data, projectiles, etc come together.
If anyone is interested in a 16" Faxon LR-308 barrel, Brass (converted Norma and x51), dies, PM me...
Edit: projectiles sold.
Did an expantion test today at 150 ft. Velocity at target was around 1750 fps with a Barnes ttsx 225gr into water jugs. Moral of the story is I'm not going to worry about expansion with 8.6 anymore.
Griffin Optimus 9 w/high pressure baffle removed.
It is an excellent suppressor. It does not supress everything better than dedicated cans, but it suppresses everything well.Bummer!
How do you like that Optimus though?
Griffin Optimus 9 w/high pressure baffle removed.
As far as I can tell (I didn't take it apart, so as to not molest the crime scene) only the baffle stack, baffle retention nut, and end cap were damaged. Griffin will be able to repair it, but I am certain that I will have to come out of pocket a bit since it was my fault.
Unfortunately I sent my Optimus in Late last year to have the baffle stack upgraded to their new design.I had to do the same thing with my Liberty Mystic a number of years ago. Except in my case, someone else shot it and neglected to verify the booster threads were tight against the barrel. A full magazine of 9mm through it with loose threads caused some damage similar to yours, although not quite as severe.
Fortunately for me Liberty was offering an upgrade to their newer Mystic X core; if Griffin has something like that maybe it'll be worthwhile in the long run.
Aww, that sucks man.Un
Unfortunately I sent my Optimus in Late last year to have the baffle stack upgraded to their new design.
Everything sold except the Barrel.I have decided to get out of the 8.6 until more established data, projectiles, etc come together.
If anyone is interested in a 16" Faxon LR-308 barrel, Brass (converted Norma and x51), dies, PM me...
Edit: projectiles sold.
Everything sold except the Barrel.
I converted x51 and Barnes brass to 8.6. It required neck turning, but other than that, required the same amount of work as converting non-hornady 6.5 brass.Anyone do any further testing on 308 conversion vs 6.5? I have a TON of 308 and not a whole lot of 6.5 laying around at this point. I ordered some 8.6 dies and have an on press trimmer. Would be only loading 8.6 for subs anyways so the % load to case volume shouldnt be an issue talked about on page one but just wondering if anyone has ironed out more of the forming differences from those two parents?
Same experience here. Runs fine after neck turning.I converted x51 and Barnes brass to 8.6. It required neck turning, but other than that, required the same amount of work as converting non-hornady 6.5 brass.
You’ll have to work up your load same as with any other brass, just expect max to be a grain or two lower if you’re using heavy brass. This is no different than working up 308 loads with LC brass for example, compared to lighter commercial brass. It’s not a big deal.Same experience here. Runs fine after neck turning.
However, I haven't looked into volume/ pressure differences between 308 and 6.5CM brass as described earlier in the thread by Unclemoak though (thanks to him for that great info), and I'm not sure if I fully understand the full implications of how these differences could affect the brass or the shot. Does anyone else have any insight into practical implications of these differences for someone who would like to learn?
Internal ballistics primer…..this is good intro into internal ballisticsSame experience here. Runs fine after neck turning.
However, I haven't looked into volume/ pressure differences between 308 and 6.5CM brass as described earlier in the thread by Unclemoak though (thanks to him for that great info), and I'm not sure if I fully understand the full implications of how these differences could affect the brass or the shot. Does anyone else have any insight into practical implications of these differences for someone who would like to learn?
Continuing the journey with the Peregrin .338 subsonic projectiles. Currently working ATF Form6 with BATFE and a Customs Broker. Still sorting out how much shipping, customs, and customs broker fees total....
PM if interested,
ZY
Some more information on the volume differences between a resized 6.5 Creedmoor case and a 308 case.
I had a friend do some analysis in Quickload after measuring the case volumes.
6.5 Creedmoor Case - Max capacity is 46.60 grains
308 Case - Max capacity 43.30 grains
Results from shooting 300 gr SMKs from factory Q headstamped 8.6 cases loaded with 16 grains of 1680, loaded to 2.750 COAL
Went to work on this today... just to have my mark 7 power die style trimmer die on me on only the the 3rd case it was ever used for smh. Hopefully hear back from them tomorrow and back up and running later this week.I converted x51 and Barnes brass to 8.6. It required neck turning, but other than that, required the same amount of work as converting non-hornady 6.5 brass.
My understanding is case capacity should be measured on a fired case opposed to a sized case anyways. Could be wrong but thats what some friends showing me around quickload suggestedThanks for the QL screenshots. Maybe I missed it, but does the case capacity change after firing if the parent was 308?
Thanks for the great insight!You’ll have to work up your load same as with any other brass, just expect max to be a grain or two lower if you’re using heavy brass. This is no different than working up 308 loads with LC brass for example, compared to lighter commercial brass. It’s not a big deal.
What’s important is learning how to work up loads. That’s critical with something like this round, regardless what brass you use, because the limited data out there is questionable and needs to be approached with caution. Do NOT just go by primer appearance, and make sure you’re measuring shoulder bump on your brass, compared to your chamber; failure to do so can create excess headspace which causes false pressure signs.
Thanks for the great resource. Just started working my way through it and I am already learning a lot. Thanks!Internal ballistics primer…..this is good intro into internal ballistics
Not sure my pm went through. Please PM me price and shipping.I have decided to get out of the 8.6 until more established data, projectiles, etc come together.
If anyone is interested in a 16" Faxon LR-308 barrel, Brass (converted Norma and x51), dies, PM me...
Edit: projectiles sold.
Thanks for all the “expert “ advice. HeheI’d recommend sticking with your 6.5 Hornady brass, annealing and neck trimming.
***** Start low with your powder charges. It seems that pressure spikes quickly.
Annealing the brass makes a huge difference when forming this case.
This is advice from someone whose fired 15 rounds from a 700 16” Faxon barrel. I chambered each unloaded piece of brass and a couple loaded rounds . I didn’t like how the bolt closed until I neck trimmed slightly into the case shoulders.
Thanks, I’ll give that a try. However, it’s almost like the bolt isn’t unlocking.I had to clear one of those from a friends gun last week. I collapsed the stock and pulled hard on the charging handle while he tapped the end of a cleaning rod with a brass hammer. It popped right out.
I ended up taking the gun into a gunsmith. Mortaring didn’t work, nor did tapping a rod down the barrel.@therevoman
You can always try mortaring your gun then.
Or if you have a good ambi charging handle stand on it when the barrel safety in front of you and then give a little tap with both feet. Kinda like a mortar but more force on the charging handle than the buffer tube.
I cannot say this will damage your gun or not?
***edit**This was with subs? Not sure there would be the pressure to really seal that brass in there, but maybe everything is just new?
Glad you got it fixed!I ended up taking the gun into a gunsmith. Mortaring didn’t work, nor did tapping a rod down the barrel.
I was doing subs. My brass was well loved 6.5 Creedmoor brass with 8 ish loadings. Maybe that one piece had a lose primer pocket and the cap backed out.
I agree; I love having different screwdrivers in my toolbox, but that 1:3 twist is makes it a niche odd as hell tri wing screw head. Yes; counterproductive for any type commercial success as the bullet selection is limited in scope and manufacturers. A couple of threads here has proven that lead core bullets are not happy at 400-500K+ RPM’s.
Honestly, it‘s hard enough to find components as is and I hate having to go out and buy additional style bullets just so I can shoot them down one particular cartridge barrel when I have bonded or lead jacketed bullets already sitting here, already paid for that work perfectly fine in 1:6.5 twist barrels at supersonic speeds.
I did purchase some Makers 350’s but I’m not even going attempt to shoot them in the Spectre or Whisper, that in itself makes that bullet a one trick bullet.
If I didn't already have 338 Spectre gas guns, I would sacrifice one my 1-6:5 blanks to try in 8.6 BO.
Anyone looking for affordable solid copper bullets should look at Shooters Pro Shop online, approved dealer for all Nosler seconds. Just bought 338 225gr expansion tip lead free for 27.95 per 50. I have a question in light of all discussion about shooting lead-free: does that include subsonic? Load data in Faxon chart uses Sierra 300, which is not lead free. I have a large quantity of Nosler equivalent I bought for my 338 Spectre and have been planning to load for 8.6. Opinions?I agree; I love having different screwdrivers in my toolbox, but that 1:3 twist is makes it a niche odd as hell tri wing screw head. Yes; counterproductive for any type commercial success as the bullet selection is limited in scope and manufacturers. A couple of threads here has proven that lead core bullets are not happy at 400-500K+ RPM’s.
Honestly, it‘s hard enough to find components as is and I hate having to go out and buy additional style bullets just so I can shoot them down one particular cartridge barrel when I have bonded or lead jacketed bullets already sitting here, already paid for that work perfectly fine in 1:6.5 twist barrels at supersonic speeds.
I did purchase some Makers 350’s but I’m not even going attempt to shoot them in the Spectre or Whisper, that in itself makes that bullet a one trick bullet.
If I didn't already have 338 Spectre gas guns, I would sacrifice one my 1-6:5 blanks to try in 8.6 BO.