Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’d prefer to keep it a passion. When it becomes a job, well it’s just a job.Honest question here... How many people do you think compete in F-Class, NRA high power, 3-Gun, etc? All were very popular at one time. I could be completely wrong, but I feel like it's a fairly small number compared against the greater hunting and general shooting segments of the industry. Many of those disciplines or organizations/clubs grew quickly just like PRS/NRL, but died out almost just as quickly. I'm not sure there's anything, any changes that could be made to counteract the slow entropy and eventual downsizing of these events.
Sure, there will always be a dedicated group getting together to stroke each other's egos, but the vast majority of Sportsmen and women in the U.S. will choose to hunt, plink on grand-daddy's land, or hold outlaw events for smaller groups of friends.
I'm usually not a pessimist, but the level of drama and shenanigans in the precision rifle industry is pretty awful.
Brings me back to what I said initially, this sport has to be either a passion, or create an emotion, or be your job. Otherwise it's just going to be a thing that average people try out for a time, and then move on.
This has been an interesting read for me as an outsider to the PRS style matches. I come from the f-class and bench rest side of competitions. I have been the match director for many state and regional f-class championships, and believe me, it's growing. The club I used to belong to started a Monday league for f-class that had maybe 15-20 when I started, to having 65-80 people there regularly the last 4 years. Sling shooting is dying, but we have figured out a way to keep some of the old guys going by putting scopes on their rifles.Honest question here... How many people do you think compete in F-Class, NRA high power, 3-Gun, etc? All were very popular at one time. I could be completely wrong, but I feel like it's a fairly small number compared against the greater hunting and general shooting segments of the industry. Many of those disciplines or organizations/clubs grew quickly just like PRS/NRL, but died out almost just as quickly. I'm not sure there's anything, any changes that could be made to counteract the slow entropy and eventual downsizing of these events.
For kids the 22’s r awesome. Also, the A-10 stock is good as well.I really like the conversation of growing the shooter base. I have dabbled in local matches (PRS and outlaw) and even took 2nd place out of 50ish shooters at one outlaw match, but I’m usually a upper 1/3rd shooter - I have really enjoyed it and learned a great deal about shooting but I am not anywhere close to being a serious competitor because I don’t dedicate the time to practice and compete - I want to take my kids fishing and shi
the one thing that prevents me from doing more matches is availability and predictable schedule. You need an option for someone to “show up” to a match - I like the shadow competitor idea so that I can just roll up to core and shoot a 2 day match if my schedule allows. Having to sign up and register/pay for a match 6 months out, and the day it’s available for registration is pretty discouraging, and a new shooter is not going to drop $1000 on a two day event plus a long road trip to “try something out”
this is why the local club matches are the ticket.
The club match format can be tweaked by those who know better, but I have an idea to bring new people In
have a “short course” where any gear is allowed, and the targets are bigger, say 500 and in with a full ipsc at 500, the rest are 3moa, or “deer vitals” size, “fees” for the
short course are $25 or so, no prizes
shooting should be field shooting positions, no weird contrived stages like “shoot from a swingset”. A round count around 40 required shots but the shooter can shoot a few more, dope and wind calls can be provided with a spotter
another tweak needs to be a weight limit or just force people to shoot off handed. It was frustrating me when I was winning the local tactical division until another guy built a 30lb .308 with all the bells and whistles and was free recoiling every shot and started winning.
I want more movement, but that is really tough for some locations
The production class is kinda silly but it made the industry flex and produce some great rifles at a great price point, so thought should be applied before throwing out that class
bring in gass gunners, lots of guys have 3 gun rifles, the short course could easily accommodate them while pushing them to be better shooters
finally, figure out a way to bring kids into the fold, and to do that we need rifles that fit kids that are semi affordable the best thing I can come up with is an AR 15, but the grip is still troublesome. I am struggling greatly to figure out how to build a bolt gun a kid can shoot comfortably that fits well, (im sure I could call any number of the reputable smiths on the hide and they can come up with a solution for the right price)
a prize table option to reduce heart ache - make it known that some of the prizes are going to a shooter “in need” and MD identify that new shooter who is safe and has a good attitude but is attempting to use a Ruger American rifle and $300 scope, and give that guy the new bolt gun or that certificate for a new rifle, find the young shooter with a budget scope to give the NF, but make it known that some of those prizes are not “won” they are earned,
If matches only required just a rifle it still would be hard to get new people into it... but this shit with needing a wheelbarrow full of different bags, plus a tripod and bunch of ARCA stuff in order to be on level footing with other shooters is a recipe for failure IMHO.
As someone who is relatively new to precision rifles and long-range shooting as compared to a lot of guys on here, AND as someone who's been shooting pistols in both IDPA and USPSA for about 15 years (as well as a ton of 3-gun and outlaw/steel matches thrown in), my take on the PRS/NRL kind of shooting is this: there's too much extra shit needed to shoot a damn match!
The only things needed to compete should be a shooter and a gun like IDPA/USPSA or as close to that as possible. 1 rifle with a bipod and 1 bag should be enough.
You don't really need much to be competitive.
A rifle, good ammo, a kestrel ...
My rifle is a little heavy at 20lbs
But the perception of needing certain gear to be competitive is just that, perception, driven by marketing departments.
As a new/average shooter. I'm looking to shoot some matches this year.
Below is an excerpt from the match breakdown of a PRS event not far from me.
"_ _ _ Rifles welcomes all shooters, especially newcomers to the sport. However, in the past, _ _ _ Rifles matches have been proved to be one of the most challenging matches in the PRS."
Notice the newcomers welcome, however??? It's discouraging. Why would I want to set myself up for failure. I'll be passing on that one.
Contrast that to a local series, pretty sure it's a renegade PRS? This is where I'll pop my precision bolt gun comp cherry!
The first match is a beginner's, 1 day matches, $50 bucks, & 100 rounds.
Welcome to the 2020 Mason Dixon Precision Rifle Series (MDPRS)
Qualifying matches will be open to 40-50 competitors with a match fee of $50 per match.
Recommended equipment:
Rifle capable of 1 MOA or better, with a repeatable zero
Scope that you can easily dial or hold for elevation
100 rounds of quality ammo, 308 or under with a max velocity of 3150 fps
Confirmed dope at longer ranges (preferably up to 700 yards)
Bipod, tripod, shooting bags, back pack, sling, food/snacks, water …. Bring what you have
Go to YouTube and search for Precision Rifle Series (PRS) to see what to expect for the stages
As a new shooter that comes from an archery background I couldn't agree more. One of the biggest problems as I see it is with classes, specifically the lack of a "pro" class. Even at a local match a new or casual shooter is expected to "compete" with the top shooters in the sport if one happens to show up to a local match, just because that new or casual shooter has the same class of weapon as the "pro".Look at Archery Events and how many people are there, if you want to copy anything its archery.
Hunting is by far much bigger, we are just small segments dancing around it.
The big F Class matches are huge, 100s of competitors, those usually combine Palma, which is dwindling in participation, F Class is more popular, but on par to Benchrest as it's just Belly Benchrest. Their numbers are stronger too.
We are definitely in a minority, handgun sports, 3GN, etc, are all bigger by a wide margin
this reminds me of world cup. I have done Archery for over 20 years ,and archery continues to grow by leaps and bounds. Every one shoots in their category.As a new shooter that comes from an archery background I couldn't agree more. One of the biggest problems as I see it is with classes, specifically the lack of a "pro" class. Even at a local match a new or casual shooter is expected to "compete" with the top shooters in the sport if one happens to show up to a local match, just because that new or casual shooter has the same class of weapon as the "pro".
Every year the worlds largest indoor archery tournament has 3-4 thousand shooters and every year more shooters show up. How many amateurs do you think would show up if they had to compete against Reo WIlde or Jesse Broadwater just because they choose to shoot a freestyle rig. They show up to shoot against other amateurs while shooting next to professionals, giving them a chance to succeed as well as something to aspire to. If an amateur busts his ass and improves to the point that he feels he is ready to compete against the big boys he pays the increased entry fee to shoot in the professional class and is eligible to compete for the top prizes.
Now at the local level a tiny little indoor shoot that is not affiliated with a corporation, series, or governing body will still have an option at registration to shoot in the pro or money class, they pay a higher entry fee and compete for the money. Out of the 100 or so shooters that show up maybe only a handful will be registered as pros, they have a good time competing with the handful of people at their skill level, and the rest of the field can have a good time knowing they are not dead money because a few pros showed up to their little tourney.
The barrier to entry in indoor archery is very small, you need a bow, 20 yards, a target, and a 25 cent target face. Stand on the line and shoot 30 or 60 arrows, add up your score and you very quickly find out how your scores stack up. This is a sport that literally almost everyone can do in their basement and they still travel and pay money to shoot in competitions. Precision rifle is quite different, you HAVE TO participate in some type of match to see where you stand, and for beginners to be thrown in the same class as the top shooters is most definitely a deterrent for participation.
So who determines who is a "pro": Easy, the shooter at registration, if they are good enough to compete at the highest level they pay a higher entry fee and compete for the money and top prizes. While the amateurs are happy to compete for a trophy or maybe a free entry to the next competition.
In a sport without paid spectators the participants and sponsors are left footing the bill for the top shooters. The sponsors will have a tendency to keep donating because they see it as an investment or an obligation. The casual and new shooters will grow tired of footing the bill for the "pros" and find other things to do. Great recipe for stagnant growth.
If it were up to me the classes would be:
1. Juniors(should be the primary focus of any shooting sport)
2. Ladies
3. Limited(weight limit)
4. Open
5. Open Pro
I do think Archery is the answer, at least a model
I have been looking at it, their numbers are incredible, it's a decent model to follow
I gotta few suggestions that are very simple: you shoot the fucking COF as it's written, in the spirit it is written. If you are to shoot with the front of your rifle off the rung of a ladder, you shoot the fucker as it's written. That would imply no bag on the front, and no tripod supporting the rear. On some of these barricades, when you allow a front bag and a rear support, it is sometimes more stable than shooting the fucking stage prone. This kind of activity mitigates the reasoning behind the various obstacles MD's go through the trouble of setting up at their matches.Hi,
So in light of some of the other threads in regards to discussions of the precision shooting organizations, rules, procedures, methods, etc etc that are clearly NOT sitting well within the community members here.
I would like to task this thread to be a community talent pool to discuss the real importance of growing the sport.
My opinion is that we must put the growth of the sport over the growth of the industry. My thought process behind that is with growth of the sport the industry grows organically as to organizations pushing for growth of the industry without providing a way to grow the sport actually can cause the growth to become stagnant.
DISCLAIMER: I do not have the answers to some of the recently discussed issues but I am here to say that even though my livelihood is the industry....we need growth of the sport first and foremost.
Individual match participants must be increased in a manner to tap into the common man, woman, girl, transgender, etc etc without them being 1 match and out participants because of perceived equipment cost, perceived "I do not fit in", perceived "it doesn't make me a better shooter/hunter", etc etc.
It may come off as kind of opposite mentality and business model as some of my other discussions on my Hoplite Arms thread in which that business model is to go straight to the top in regards to top tier price and market but that really is different than what IMO needs to be done in regards to growing the precision rifle competition base. By growing that precision rifle competition base the law of numbers will grow some of them into big dollar purchasers.
From my side of the house I am requesting us industry folks get behind growing the sports base ahead of growing our industry market.
Not everyone is going to afford a Hoplite Arms rifle and that is ok with me but that does not mean I do not want to support growing the number of shooters that partake in a precision rifle match.
Not everyone is going to afford a RRS Tripod and head but that does not mean they should be discarded in regards to their importance of overall firearm ownership.
Sincerely,
Theis
Everyone shoots the same pro skill time, pro skill targets, and pro skill props. So only the top contenders + shooters that had a lucky/good day walk away feeling good.
I see the problem of "working" in the industry as the extension added to people because they are "sponsored" for lack of better word.
Now you start talking to companies, most of the time it's all free, but you are now working in the industry helping design something ... a few are paid and paid well. They have a couple of solid $25k sponsors out there, but not enough to live off of in 2021.
The PRO tag is a joke, they get mad because they see someone like me, "get stuff" to review or write about, or video, and think, why me, or why him, or why can't I, he did... but I actually built a business around this and it happened over 19 years, while working another job. All pros are, people ballsy enough without a resume to ask for something in exchange for nothing but repeating their name at a match. if you want to shoot a bunch of matches, the more names you can repeat, the bigger pro you are.
SH was a Hobby, until a few short year later it wasn't, like 12 years is when I was finally able to stand behind the site as it's own income. Prior I worked my real job, and then 3 weeks on, 1 week off at Rifles Only for 7 years as a "side job" in the gun industry while operating SH in-between hours.
Nobody see the real work, only the public side and many say, if he can, I can, and so they start trying. In the early years there was more Vortex talkers than sponsors, because Vortex was cheap enough everyone had them and put the name on their shirts, permissions be damned. You see less shirts today because they made it a joke previously by making shit up.
But this is a journey, not a jaunt, nobody is making money without building something else around them.
This is a problem only for those who need extrinsic rewards to feel they accomplished something.
In my experience, people like that have the following characteristics
Setting up a competition format to cater to those people is a failure before it even gets off the ground.
- An inflated idea of their skills
- No humility to accept reality
- No drive to get better, they want the bar lowered to where they do well
BTW, what most of you call "pros" are people who are the complete opposite of the ones I describe above. They took their ass kicking as a motivation to do better, not as an excuse to quit or ask for an easier shooting problem. Most of them aren't "pros" since most of them don't make their living in the shooting industry.
I don't know how many people "flock" to those sports with handicapping. I don't know how you know either.If your theory was correct, there wouldn’t be people flocking to participate in amateur bowling, golf, pool, etc etc that all have handicap systems.
Only 20% or less of participants in a game or sport have the drive and/or ability to be at the top.
If you don’t cater to the other 80% first, you’ll fail attempting to cater to the 20%.
I think that what attract shooters to a shooting sport are:
- A mature rulebook that provides for a uniform match experience (notice I didn't say uniform stages) regardless of where you go.
- A baseline level of officiating expertise facilitated with a uniform training, certification, and recertification standard.
- Equipment divisions that provide a real differentiator between firearms that would not be competitive bunched together
- The fact that everyone, from GM to noob, shoots the same stages in a given match with no "women's tee".
I don't know how many people "flock" to those sports with handicapping. I don't know how you know either.
I don't have the resources, and probably not the ability, to get to the top of USPSA. Just like most. Despite that, my motivation to compete and improve is still there. And I see that in a lot of others I know so I'm not exceptional in that regard.
Even though USPSA has shooter classifications (a handicapping of sorts), there's nothing to win with them in club matches and precious little in level 2 and 3 matches. And yet attendance is through the roof even with covid
I have a theory.
I think that what attract shooters to a shooting sport are:
- A mature rulebook that provides for a uniform match experience (notice I didn't say uniform stages) regardless of where you go.
- A baseline level of officiating expertise facilitated with a uniform training, certification, and recertification standard.
- Equipment divisions that provide a real differentiator between firearms that would not be competitive bunched together
- The fact that everyone, from GM to noob, shoots the same stages in a given match with no "women's tee".
+1I think the main problem with the whole PRS/NRL thing is just how expensive it is. Unless one is good enough to where it's a pretty safe bet that they might be coming home with some prize money or will be picking up some cool gadgets off the prize table, there's almost no reason to bother.
I know this is a "go be poor somewhere else" forum lol, but that attitude certainly doesn't grow the sport.
Shooting a regional/club-level 1-day match costs about triple the average cost of a random USPSA match... and a legit PRS/NRL 2-day match within driving distance with a $250 entry fee is what? ~$600 for the weekend with hotel/gas/food/incidentals (not even counting ~200rds at $1.00-2.00 a trigger pull)...
It's dumb really. NRL markets NRL22 partially under the guise of being for new shooters and family/youth friendly, a "not-for-profit organization dedicated to the growth and education of long range precision"... then pros and YouTube gun guys show up from two states over and stretch out behind their $5k Vudoos or whatever trying to snag a win, while 11y/o Joey with his trusty 10/22 and Walmart scope gets his "education" ...
I think the main problem with the whole PRS/NRL thing is just how expensive it is. Unless one is good enough to where it's a pretty safe bet that they might be coming home with some prize money or will be picking up some cool gadgets off the prize table, there's almost no reason to bother.
I know this is a "go be poor somewhere else" forum lol, but that attitude certainly doesn't grow the sport.
Shooting a regional/club-level 1-day match costs about triple the average cost of a random USPSA match... and a legit PRS/NRL 2-day match within driving distance with a $250 entry fee is what? ~$600 for the weekend with hotel/gas/food/incidentals (not even counting ~200rds at $1.00-2.00 a trigger pull)...
It's dumb really. NRL markets NRL22 partially under the guise of being for new shooters and family/youth friendly, a "not-for-profit organization dedicated to the growth and education of long range precision"... then pros and YouTube gun guys show up from two states over and stretch out behind their $5k Vudoos or whatever trying to snag a win, while 11y/o Joey with his trusty 10/22 and Walmart scope gets his "education" ...
^^^ Man, your reading comprehension isn’t working too well this morning, why don’t you reread what I posted, because you missed the point on pretty much everything lol.
I’m not even going to bother going through it again, but I wasn’t talking about participation trophies, or going where you’re going with it, that’s for sure... smh
I understood your point. It's very clear. ^Unless one is good enough to where it's a pretty safe bet that they might be coming home with some prize money or will be picking up some cool gadgets off the prize table, there's almost no reason to bother.
I agree. However the industry has made amazing profits the last year(s). They should give back more to the people who buy all this $$$ gear. More contribution will create more buzz. More interest and more, well more. Someone above mentioned the golf industry. Well that’s super successful, even though that was poo pooed on a few posts later. The industry should sponsee more and growth will naturally happen. Media will follow the masses and the $$ and the growth will be there. Just my $0.02.My opinion matters less than most, if not all you guys in here. Just a broad observation, but as long as there's 10 guys to replace every one of me, why would the entities(prs, nrl) give two shits about changing what is, ultimately, working as far as they give a shit? Memberships still get sold, matches still sell out, merchandise still sells. Summing it up as supply vs demand.
Right on the spotI agree. However the industry has made amazing profits the last year(s). They should give back more to the people who buy all this $$$ gear. More contribution will create more buzz. More interest and more, well more. Someone above mentioned the golf industry. Well that’s super successful, even though that was poo pooed on a few posts later. The industry should sponsee more and growth will naturally happen. Media will follow the masses and the $$ and the growth will be there. Just my $0.02.
I'm in total agreement with your thought process on this. I hail from a small town in Eastern Kentucky. There is nothing special here. Well, the birthplace of KFC is a few miles away, but that's another story. Every year, in this small town, there are a record number of ASA shooters that roll into town to compete. I think there was something like 2,000 shooters last year, and there will be that many or more here in about a month when the shoot takes place again. It's been this way for the past 10 years and it gets bigger every single year and it continues to grow. The biggest thing I've seen over the past few years is the involvement and massive participation of kids from elementary all the way to high school and college. It's the biggest draw of ASA shooters anywhere in the country each and every year, both adults and kids. When registering, each competitor chooses which class they wish to shoot in. Classes go from Pro all the way down to Novice. The rules are clearly shown in black and white what you can and can't use during the competition by way of equipment. It's this way all over the country, no matter what ASA event you take part it, you are restricted to the same speeds, stabilizer lengths, sights etc.I do think Archery is the answer, at least a model
I have been looking at it, their numbers are incredible, it's a decent model to follow
It just really keeps people excited. Then you only pay out Pro Class, but also, pro class has to pay a higher fee and pay a "Pro" registration to the entity they are affiliated with. Again, I have seen this model work. I would have a Field and Unlimited class to start with 3 or four different ability divisions. It can build from there as needed.I'm in total agreement with your thought process on this. I hail from a small town in Eastern Kentucky. There is nothing special here. Well, the birthplace of KFC is a few miles away, but that's another story. Every year, in this small town, there are a record number of ASA shooters that roll into town to compete. I think there was something like 2,000 shooters last year, and there will be that many or more here in about a month when the shoot takes place again. It's been this way for the past 10 years and it gets bigger every single year and it continues to grow. The biggest thing I've seen over the past few years is the involvement and massive participation of kids from elementary all the way to high school and college. It's the biggest draw of ASA shooters anywhere in the country each and every year, both adults and kids. When registering, each competitor chooses which class they wish to shoot in. Classes go from Pro all the way down to Novice. The rules are clearly shown in black and white what you can and can't use during the competition by way of equipment. It's this way all over the country, no matter what ASA event you take part it, you are restricted to the same speeds, stabilizer lengths, sights etc.
With that being said, and a friend of mine and myself have discussed this. One thing I have always thought was a problem with PRS matches was the equipment part of PRS. Now before you say, "well, you can go buy all those gadgets and stuff to". Yeah, I could, but hear me out.
Like ASA, the PRS shoots are held all over the country. However, they are all not held to a standard like ASA or other archery events. Let's say two shooters are in a tight race for a top spot on the PRS leader board in the SE region. Shooter A may be able to travel to a venue that will allow him to use all kinds of equipment on stages. He can use tripods, gamer plates, front and rear bags and other items during his stage. Meanwhile, Shooter B is not able to travel that weekend, but needs to shoot a match to stay in contention. So he travels to a match closer to him, only to find out that the match is ONLY allowing shooters to use a bipod and one bag on every stage. There are matches like that because I shoot in one a few times a year. At the end of the day, Shooter A finishes the match 10-15 points better than Shooter B because Shooter B was restricted to gear, while Shooter A used a multitude of equipment allowing him an advantage. But at the same time, the same two shooters would go back and forth on who won by only a couple points when using the same gear. Don't know if that makes sense, but I've tried to explain it best I could. What I'm getting at is how is that uniform and on a level playing field?
Unlike competition archery, were shooters are restricted to a strict amount of gear from the Pro Class all the way to the Novice class, PRS shooters can use everything but the kitchen sink at one event, while another event, held on the same weekend in the same region is, at times, restricted to just a handful of shooting aids. That to me is what I don't agree with. There needs to be uniformity across the board on what can and can't be used at every match. If I'm not mistaken, NRL is like this, but I could be wrong. In the above scenario, if Shooter A and Shooter B was in the Shooter of the Year event like ASA has, their placement in the shoot would be who the better shot was on that day because they were both restricted to the same exact standards equipment wise in the class they shot. That is competition IMO!!!!
And reverting back to some people saying anyone can buy the gadgets and use them. Yes, they could, but not everyone has money falling out of their ass to be able to purchase all that stuff. Then there are others that say, "well, shooters will let you borrow the stuff". Yes, they will. There is a lot of very nice, generous folks I've met at PRS matches. But a person shouldn't have to borrow stuff to compete. Shooting competitions should be about shooting, with all shooters starting on a level playing field. It shouldn't be a damn gear race to see who has the most shooting aids.
I know I got long winded, but it's just a discussion a friend and I had the other day. I will continue to shoot the restricted gear matches, because I wanna improve my shooting, not my ability to use gadgets.
AG cup works pretty much like thisIt just really keeps people excited. Then you only pay out Pro Class, but also, pro class has to pay a higher fee and pay a "Pro" registration to the entity they are affiliated with. Again, I have seen this model work. I would have a Field and Unlimited class to start with 3 or four different ability divisions. It can build from there as needed.
That is something I could see. Open should be open to use whatever you want to use, than have other classes for the guys who wanna shoot with using only a set amount of allowed gear. For instance, bipod and rear bag. It makes for more classes and more to keep up with, yeah, but at the same time, I think it would get more people involved. But I've been wrong before.It just really keeps people excited. Then you only pay out Pro Class, but also, pro class has to pay a higher fee and pay a "Pro" registration to the entity they are affiliated with. Again, I have seen this model work. I would have a Field and Unlimited class to start with 3 or four different ability divisions. It can build from there as needed.
Yep. The creation of the AG set apart all the household names that people talked about earlier in this post and put them competing against each other on, what I think, the most even playing field of all the classes. I see no problem with those matches. To my knowledge, they are held at one specific location, and people who wanna try and make the big show can use what they wish or what the match allows. It's not like my other example when a match in Alabama, Georgia or somewhere else in a regional shoot will allow anything within reason while another regional match in another state, or the same state for that matter will only allow a certain things, when at the end of the day, all the shooters are vying for the same spots.AG cup works pretty much like this